Abstract:Our knowledge of the anatomical organization of the human brain in health and disease draws heavily on the study of patients with focal brain lesions. Historically the first method of mapping brain function, it is still potentially the most powerful, establishing the necessity of any putative neural substrate for a given function or deficit. Great inferential power, however, carries a crucial vulnerability: without stronger alternatives any consistent error cannot be easily detected. A hitherto unexamined source of such error is the structure of the high-dimensional distribution of patterns of focal damage, especially in ischaemic injury-the commonest aetiology in lesion-deficit studies-where the anatomy is naturally shaped by the architecture of the vascular tree. This distribution is so complex that analysis of lesion data sets of conventional size cannot illuminate its structure, leaving us in the dark about the presence or absence of such error. To examine this crucial question we assembled the largest known set of focal brain lesions (n = 581), derived from unselected patients with acute ischaemic injury (mean age = 62.3 years, standard deviation = 17.8, male:female ratio = 0.547), visualized with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, and processed with validated automated lesion segmentation routines. High-dimensional analysis of this data revealed a hidden bias within the multivariate patterns of damage that will consistently distort lesion-deficit maps, displacing inferred critical regions from their true locations, in a manner opaque to replication. Quantifying the size of this mislocalization demonstrates that past lesion-deficit relationships estimated with conventional inferential methodology are likely to be significantly displaced, by a magnitude dependent on the unknown underlying lesion-deficit relationship itself. Past studies therefore cannot be retrospectively corrected, except by new knowledge that would render them redundant. Positively, we show that novel machine learning techniques employing high-dimensional inference can nonetheless accurately converge on the true locus. We conclude that current inferences about human brain function and deficits based on lesion mapping must be re-evaluated with methodology that adequately captures the high-dimensional structure of lesion data.

Computational limits to the legibility of the imaged human brain

Computational limits to the legibility of the imaged human brain

Unveiling universal aspects of the cellular anatomy of the brain

Computational imaging with the human brain

Benchmarking the human brain against computational architectures

Imitating and exploring the human brain's resting and task-performing states via brain computing: scaling and architecture

Gossamer: Scaling Image Processing and Reconstruction to Whole Brains

Linking Brain Structure, Activity, and Cognitive Function through Computation

Scanning the horizon: towards transparent and reproducible neuroimaging research

Microscopic computation in human brain evolution

Interpreting Brain Biomarkers: Challenges and solutions in interpreting machine learning-based predictive neuroimaging

A large-scale examination of inductive biases shaping high-level visual representation in brains and machines

Computational neuroscience: a frontier of the 21st century

Human brain lesion-deficit inference remapped

Persistence of information flow: A multiscale characterization of human brain

Fifty shades of The Virtual Brain: Converging optimal working points yield biologically plausible electrophysiological and imaging features

On testing for spatial correspondence between maps of human brain structure and function

Nonlinear functional mapping of the human brain

Program Comprehension Does Not Primarily Rely On the Language Centers of the Human Brain

Decoding face recognition abilities in the human brain