Abstract:This scoping review aims to identify and evaluate the landscape of Polygenic Risk Score (PRS)-based methods for genomic prediction from 2013 to 2023, highlighting their advancements, key concepts, and existing gaps in knowledge, research, and technology. Over the past decade, various PRS-based methods have emerged, each employing different statistical frameworks aimed at enhancing prediction accuracy, processing speed and memory efficiency. Despite notable advancements, challenges persist, including unrealistic assumptions regarding sample sizes and the polygenicity of traits necessary for accurate predictions, as well as limitations in exploring hyper-parameter spaces and considering environmental interactions. We included studies focusing on PRS-based methods for risk prediction that underwent methodological evaluations using valid approaches and released computational tools/software. Additionally, we restricted our selection to studies involving human participants that were published in English language. This review followed the standard protocol recommended by Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's Manual, systematically searching Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Scopus and Web of Science databases. Additionally, searches included grey literature sources like pre-print servers such as bioRxiv, and articles recommended by experts to ensure comprehensive and diverse coverage of relevant records. This study identified 34 studies detailing 37 genomic prediction methods, the majority of which rely on linkage disequilibrium (LD) information and necessitate hyper-parameter tuning. Nine methods integrate functional/gene annotation, while 12 are suitable for cross-ancestry genomic prediction, with only one considering gene-environment (GxE) interaction. While some methods require individual-level data, most leverage summary statistics, offering flexibility. Despite progress, challenges remain. These include computational complexity and the need for large sample sizes for high prediction accuracy. Furthermore, recent methods exhibit varying effectiveness across traits, with absolute accuracies often falling short of clinical utility. Transferability across ancestries varies, influenced by trait heritability and diversity of training data, while handling admixed populations remains challenging. Additionally, the absence of standard error measurements for individual PRSs, crucial in clinical settings, underscores a critical gap. Another issue is the lack of customizable graphical visualization tools among current software packages. While genomic prediction methods have advanced significantly, there is still room for improvement. Addressing current challenges and embracing future research directions will lead to the development of more universally applicable, robust, and clinically relevant genomic prediction tools.

Optimizing and benchmarking polygenic risk scores with GWAS summary statistics

Optimizing and benchmarking polygenic risk scores with GWAS summary statistics

One score to rule them all: regularized ensemble polygenic risk prediction with GWAS summary statistics

Tuning parameters for polygenic risk score methods using GWAS summary statistics from training data

Methodologies underpinning polygenic risk scores estimation: a comprehensive overview

A perspective on genetic and polygenic risk scores—advances and limitations and overview of associated tools

Quantifying Portable Genetic Effects and Improving Cross-Ancestry Genetic Prediction with GWAS Summary Statistics

Applying polygenic risk score methods to pharmacogenomics GWAS: challenges and opportunities

Leveraging Effect Size Distributions to Improve Polygenic Risk Scores Derived from Summary Statistics of Genome-Wide Association Studies.

Optimization of Multi-Ancestry Polygenic Risk Score Disease Prediction Models

Summaryauc: A Tool For Evaluating The Performance Of Polygenic Risk Prediction Models In Validation Datasets With Only Summary Level Statistics

Principles and methods for transferring polygenic risk scores across global populations

Advancements and limitations in polygenic risk score methods for genomic prediction: a scoping review

Improving polygenic prediction in ancestrally diverse populations

The expected polygenic risk score (ePRS) framework: an equitable metric for quantifying polygenetic risk via modeling of ancestral makeup

Winner's Curse Correction and Variable Thresholding Improve Performance of Polygenic Risk Modeling Based on Genome-Wide Association Study Summary-Level Data

Polygenic risk score comparator ( PRScomp ): Test population vs. worldwide populations

Polygenic Risk Scores in Alzheimer’s Disease Genetics: Methodology, Applications, Inclusion, and Diversity

Identifying and characterizing disease subpopulations that most benefit from polygenic risk scores

GRPa-PRS: A risk stratification method to identify genetically-regulated pathways in polygenic diseases

A comprehensive investigation of statistical and machine learning approaches for predicting complex human diseases on genomic variants