Efficacy and Safety of Holmium Laser Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review
LIU Jian-jun,WU Tai-xiang,YANG Yu-ru,WEI Qiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-2531.2005.05.005
2005-01-01
Abstract:Objective To access the efficacy and safety of Holmium laser prostatectomy technique compared to TURP. Methods We searched MEDLINE (19962004), EMBASE (19842004), The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2004), CNKI, VIP, CMCC and CBMdisc; and handsearched the relevant Chinese journals. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) were included. The quality of trials was evaluated and meta-analysis was performed. Non-randomized controlled trials were also included to evaluate the safety and efficacy. Results We found 4 randomized controlled trials. A total of 480 participants were in the trials ranging from 60 to 200. There was no statistical difference between the two techniques at 12 or 48 months follow-up in terms of quality of life (QOL) improvement(WMD=-0.19, 95%CI-0.81 to 0.44, Z=0.59,P=0.56; WMD=-0.30, 95%CI-0.90 to 0.30, Z=0.98, P=0.33); Q_~max improvement(WMD=1.63 ml/s, 95%CI-0.32 to 3.59, Z=1.64, P=0.10; WMD=3.80 ml/s, 95%CI-1.36 to 8.96,Z=1.44, P=0.15); I-PSS or AUA (WMD=-0.06, 95%CI-1.01 to 0.89, Z=0.12, P=0.91; WMD=-1.40, 95%CI-3.91 to 1.11, Z=1.09, P=0.27) and the urethral stricture complication rate (RR=0.75, 95%CI 0.35 to 1.60, Z=0.74, P=0.46). However hospital stay was significantly shorter in the Holmium laser prostatectomy groups (total WMD=-24.89, 95%CI-28.56 to-21.21, Z=13.27, P0.000 01). We can not draw consistent conclusions in terms of blood loss according to the present data. One study indicated Holmium laser prostatectomy technique was more cost-effective than TURP. Conclusions In short period Holmium laser prostatectomy is as safe as TURP in terms of hospital stay, urethral stricture and blood loss complication. This new technique is as effiective as TURP in terms of I-PSS (AUA), Q_~max and QOL. More RCTs and more long term follow-up is necessary.