Tonsillectomy Versus Tonsillotomy in Pediatric Sleep‐Disordered Breathing: A Systematic Review and Multi‐subgroup Meta‐analysis

Jiahong Lao,Feitong Jian,Rongrong Ge,Shuo Wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.31776
IF: 2.97
2024-09-21
The Laryngoscope
Abstract:This study assesses tonsillotomy (TT) versus traditional tonsillectomy (TE) for treating children with obstructive sleep‐disordered breathing (oSDB), highlighting TT's benefits in reducing postoperative complications and enhancing recovery but noting the potential for recurrent infections due to residual tonsil tissue. Despite TT's advantages in improving children's postoperative recovery and quality of life, it necessitates a balanced consideration of its short‐term benefits against the possibility of long‐term risks, including the need for reoperation. The evaluation aims to determine the efficacy and safety of TT as a viable alternative to TE, taking into account both immediate postoperative outcomes and longer‐term health implications. Objectives To evaluate the potential of tonsillotomy (TT) as an alternative to tonsillectomy (TE) for treating children with obstructive sleep‐disordered breathing (oSDB). Data Sources Two independent reviewers searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and additional sources to identify controlled studies comparing TT versus TE in pediatric patients with oSDB. Review Methods We evaluated post‐surgery symptom relief, and short‐ and long‐term postoperative benefits for children. Fixed‐effect meta‐analysis, sensitivity analysis, and subgroup analysis were conducted. Results In our analysis of 32 studies with 9,430 children, the analysis revealed TT group had a similar therapeutic effect on improvement of OSA‐18 as TE group (MD = 5.20, 95% CI: −32.67 to 43.07, p = 0.96). In terms of short‐term outcome, the days to return to normal diet for TT group were shorter than that for TE group (MD = −2.49, 95%CI: −3.57 to −1.28; p
medicine, research & experimental,otorhinolaryngology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?