Study of the relationship between psychoactive substance use and pain in cancer patients and cancer survivors: A French nationwide cross‐sectional study

Charles Ragusa,Bruno Pereira,David Balayssac
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.35006
2024-05-17
International Journal of Cancer
Abstract:What's New? Cancer‐related pain is experienced by some 33%–40% of cancer patients. Its occurrence and severity are associated with various factors, including psychoactive substance use (PSU). In this study, to better understand relationships between PSU and cancer pain, the authors investigated the prevalence of both conditions in more than 1000 cancer patients in France. Analyses reveal associations between pain and PSU, specifically related to tobacco and cannabidiol use. In particular, chronic and neuropathic pains were strongly linked to cannabidiol use. The findings emphasize the importance of smoking cessation and close monitoring of cannabidiol use during and following cancer. Pain is a prevalent symptom among cancer patients and survivors. Psychoactive substance use (PSU) is associated with both the presence and severity of pain. However, little is known about this association in the context of cancer. The primary objective was to compare the prevalence of PSU and its relationship with pain during and after cancer. PSU was defined as the use of nonmedication substances (alcohol, tobacco, e‐cigarettes, cannabidiol, and cannabis), with frequency categorized as at least yearly, monthly, weekly, or daily. Secondary objectives aimed to explore the relationships between PSU and pain characteristics, health‐related quality of life, anxiety, depression, deprivation, and individual characteristics. Among the 1041 individuals included, pain prevalence was 44.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 41.6%–47.8%). The overall prevalence of PSU at least monthly was 67.0% (95% CI 64.0%–69.8%). The proportions of chronic and neuropathic pains were higher for at least monthly use of cannabidiol compared to nonuse (70.0% vs. 39.3% and 55.7% vs. 28.1%, p
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?