Abstract:The basic arguments for a mental image model of thought are based on neuropsychological evidence. Farah found that the same brain regions are activated during both mental representation and actual perception, while Bishiah found that brain traumas that affected perception, also affected the ability to create mental images. Pylyshyn on the other hand, argues that all mental images are guided by ‘’cognitive penetrability’’, thus on their very basis, are manipulated by certain propositional elements. Given this difficulty, Kargopoulos hinted towards further research, featuring shapes and solid objects, for which subjects have no prior extensive knowledge. This would force subjects to use non-semantic strategies of representation, meaning mental imagery. Hinton’s cube problem conforms to these requirements. Hinton’s problem aligns with the idea that spatial tasks (especially tasks with cubes that change layout) are guided by propositional cues (our knowledge about squares) and supports Pylyshyn’s position. Using one of the simplest objects, a cube, Hinton showed that as soon as this shape changes its mental arrangement in space, even suspicious -as to the nature of the experiment- participants will make mistakes that are not present when they manipulate a mental image of the cube sitting on its typical array [1-5]. Aim: Our goal was to investigate the relationship between spatio-visual skill and the ability for mental partitioning in healthy subjects. Methodology: We used 2 groups (344 participants) a control and an experimental one. In the control group, we presented a Moebius’ strip, in the experimental group, we presented the same Moebius’ strip and asked them to mentally represent it. All participants asked to mentally partition the strip. Results: Of the 344 participants, only 31 managed to give the correct number of vertices in space. Though people had a hard time manipulating the cube’s mental image, their success rates were much higher for the Hinton 1 task in which propositional representation was more accessible. Only 9 of the 344 participants could find the correct answer for the Moebius strip task in which mental manipulation of the strip image was impossible. Conclusions: We come to the conclusion that the relationship between ‘’seeing’’ and ‘’knowing’’ is more complex, not just on the level of the mental image level but also on the level of perception. Our findings bring back to the scientific background the idea that the mind’s selective attention to previous experience and cognitive schemas will decidedly affect human thought

Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach

Representation,Qualia and Verbal Thinking

Perceptual Experience As a Bridge Between the Retina and a Bicoded Cognitive Map.

Dual coding theory, word abstractness, and emotion: A critical review of Kousta et al. (2011).

Dual Representation and the Linking of Concrete and Symbolic Representations

Microscopic and macroscopic approaches to the mental representations of second languages.

Spatiotemporal dynamics of abstract and concrete semantic representations

The Neurobiology Of Thinking, Identity, And Geniality

A Philosophical Understanding of Representation for Neuroscience

Modal and amodal cognition: an overarching principle in various domains of psychology

Arguments about the nature of concepts: Symbols, embodiment, and beyond

Representing the World in Language and Thought

Representational Systems Theory: A Unified Approach to Encoding, Analysing and Transforming Representations

Cognitive Semiotics

Beyond the episodic–semantic continuum: the multidimensional model of mental representations

Representation and identity - convergence of brain research and mind-brain philosophy

Mind’s Selective Attention to Previous Experience

The Metaphysics of Representation

Dual Population Coding in the Neocortex: A Model of Interaction between Representation and Attention in the Visual Cortex

Representation and computation in visual working memory

Conscious Representations: An Intractable Problem for the Computational Theory of Mind