Abstract:"Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality" is one of the important tasks of China's current and future economic construction and development, but the carbon emission reduction effect of High-speed rail (HSR) has not yet been fully studied. In this paper, based on the panel data of 274 cities in China from 2003 to 2016, we take the opening of HSR in the cities as a "Quasi-natural Experiment", and construct the Multi-period Difference-in-Difference Model to explore whether the opening of HSR can reduce carbon emissions of cities along the route, and use the mediating effect model and moderating effect model to further analyze its internal mechanisms. We find that:①The opening of HSR can significantly reduce the carbon emissions of cities along the route, and the opening of HSR in a city will reduce the carbon emissions of the city by about 2.4% on average, and this carbon emission reduction effect usually manifests significantly in the first year after the opening of HSR, and increases year by year thereafter.②The mechanism test shows that the traffic substitution effect, the optimization of the industrial structure and the promotion of economic agglomeration have partial mediating effect on the influence between the opening of HSR and urban carbon emissions. In addition, the increase in the intensity of government environmental regulations can strengthen the effect of the opening of HSR on reducing urban carbon emissions.③The regional heterogeneity research shows that the opening of HSR has a more significant impact on the carbon emissions of cities in the eastern coastal region and western region of China. Moreover, in the western region, the reduction effect of the opening of HSR on carbon emissions is only reflected in the key cities rather than ordinary prefecture-level cities. This paper provides certain reference significance for promoting low-carbon and green economy and helping China to achieve the "Carbon Neutrality" climate action goal.

The impact of high-speed rail on SO2 emissions—based on spatial difference-in-differences analysis

Impacts of High-Speed Railways on Economic Growth and Disparity in China

Spatio-temporal distribution of Chinese cities' air quality and the impact of high-speed rail

High-speed rail and CO2 emissions in urban China: A spatial difference-in-differences approach

Revealing the transmission mechanism and spatial spillover of carbon emission reduction caused by high-speed rail opening.

Exploring spatial heterogeneity in the high-speed rail impact on air quality

Impact of the opening of high-speed rail on environmental pollution in the Yangtze River Economic Belt: Promoting or inhibiting?

Can the opening of high-speed rail reduce environmental pollution? An empirical research based on difference-in-differences model

Can the opening of high-speed rail boost the reduction of air pollution and carbon emissions? Quasi-experimental evidence from China

Reducing carbon emissions: Can high-speed railway contribute?

Impact of high-speed rail on green space coverage in China: From the spatial spillover effect and regional disparity perspectives

The impact of high-speed rail on urban carbon emissions: Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta

How do high-speed rails influence city carbon emissions?

Has the opening of high-speed railway in China promoted urban low-carbon transformation along the route: re-estimation based on staggered DID robust estimators

Impact and mechanisms of high-speed rail construction on carbon emissions: A quasi-natural experiment in China

Impact of high-speed rail on urban residents’ consumption in China—from a spatial perspective

How does high-speed rail construction affect air pollutant emissions? Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration in China

How does the location of high-speed railway stations affect the emission reduction effect of industrial structure upgrading?

How does the opening of China’s high-speed rail affect the spatial mismatch of haze pollution and economic growth?

Does high-speed rail improve China’s urban environmental efficiency? Empirical evidence from a quasi-natural experiment

Has the opening of high-speed rail reduced urban carbon emissions? Empirical analysis based on panel data of cities in China