Unionization, licensure and workplace variation in pay inequality between immigrants and natives

Ida Drange,Håvard Helland,Are Skeie Hermansen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwad075
IF: 4.058
2024-01-30
Socio-Economic Review
Abstract:Abstract Organizational research has revealed considerable variation in immigrant–native pay inequalities across workplace contexts. However, less is known about how broader labor market institutions intersect in the local dynamics of wage setting between employees of immigrant and native backgrounds. We argue that union density and higher shares of employees in licensed occupations in workplaces constrain organizational opportunity structures for unequal pay according to immigrant backgrounds. Our analysis of longitudinal linked employer–employee administrative data for the Norwegian labor market shows that the wage gap between immigrants and natives decreases with increasing workplace unionization, but almost exclusively for immigrants who are union members. Next, licensure raises pay at the individual and workplace levels, although any reduction in immigrant–native pay gaps is contingent on immigrants’ access to licensed jobs. Our findings support the claim that institutional regulation in the workplace reduces the organizational scope of unequal pay based on immigrant status.
economics,political science,sociology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper primarily explores how union density and occupational licensing systems influence wage inequality between immigrants and natives in the workplace. Specifically, the study focuses on the following core issues: 1. **The Role of Unions**: The paper hypothesizes that in workplaces with higher union density, the wage gap between immigrants and natives will be smaller. This is because unions can reduce this gap through collective bargaining agreements, increased job stability, and other means. 2. **Impact of Occupational Licensing**: The authors believe that in workplaces with a higher proportion of employees holding occupational licenses, the wage gap between immigrants and natives will also be smaller. This is because obtaining a license often signifies meeting certain skill standards, which helps alleviate employers' concerns about the capabilities of employees with immigrant backgrounds and may promote fairer wage distribution. 3. **Importance of Individual Membership**: The study further suggests that for immigrant workers who join unions, the wage gap between them and natives will be smaller compared to immigrant workers who do not join unions. This indicates that even in high union density workplaces, individual union membership can bring additional benefits. 4. **Advantages of Licensed Immigrants**: The paper also examines the changes in wage gaps between licensed and unlicensed immigrants in workplaces with a large number of employees holding occupational licenses. It is expected that the wage gap between licensed immigrants and natives will be smaller than the gap between unlicensed immigrants and natives. 5. **Differences Among Generational Immigrants**: Finally, the study considers the different performances of first-generation immigrants and second-generation immigrants (i.e., children of immigrants) under the aforementioned mechanisms. It is expected that union systems and occupational licensing will provide stronger protection for first-generation immigrants, as these measures can better compensate for their deficiencies in language, cultural adaptation, and other areas. In summary, this paper aims to validate the above hypotheses by analyzing longitudinal employer-employee administrative data from the Norwegian labor market, in order to understand how broader labor market institutions influence wage inequality based on immigrant status within the workplace.