Abstract:Background: The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) is preparing a new set of regulations that will cover working and resting periods for crew members engaged in emergency medical services with helicopters (HEMS) and aeroplanes (AEMS). Such a shared European regulatory framework has already been introduced for the majority of commercial operations with aeroplanes, whereas national regulations are still in place for helicopter operations. A possible consequence of changing the regulations on working and resting periods for helicopter operations is that current abilities to provide 24-h, continuous emergency readiness with the same helicopter crew will be changed to a daily shift pattern with two, and even up to three, different crews to cover one 24-h period. Methods: A cost-benefit study is used to analyse whether changed working and resting periods, through the introduction of a shared European framework are socio-economically profitable for Norwegian helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS). For the study, relevant data is available for the total of nine HEMS helicopters of the three regions in Norway, for the period 2006-2013. The aim of the study is to document whether changed working and resting periods will be socio-economically beneficial for the Norwegian HEMS. Results: The expected present value of changing the current regulations on working and resting periods is estimated at negative 181 million NOK over a 40-year period. This includes the assumption that all missions that are not completed today due to limitation in crew availability will be completed upon introducing new working and resting periods. In the current regulatory regime for the Norwegian HEMS, there are on average seven missions per HEMS base annually that are not completed due to the limitations in crew availability with the current working and resting periods. Changing the regulations on working and resting periods is estimated to be cost-effective when a minimum of 14 missions per year are prevented from being cancelled due to crew availability. Discussion: The benefit and cost elements used in the socio-economic analysis contain an estimated benefit of the measure, based on the valuation of life years gained for a limited number of patients. The prerequisites for life years gained, with the associated monetary value for quality-adjusted life years, are important for the outcome of the cost-benefit analysis. In this study 6.95 life years gained is used as basis for the benefit of the measure. This number is based on the conclusion of two studies, which have studied the benefits of HEMS helicopters staffed with a doctor in Norway. In a cost-benefit analyses, a quantification shall as far as possible be made in monetary values of all the positive and negative effects the measure entails. In this analysis, one criticism may be that these effects are relatively few, the investment costs (the increased operating costs) are not provided a detailed description of, and other factors such as; effect on the environment, risk of simultaneous requirements of the HEMS helicopter with possible negative effect for the patient who most needs it, likelihood of accidents with associated negative effect are neither included in the cost-benefit analysis. Conclusion: Alternations to the working and resting periods for Norwegian HEMS operations that will result in a change from the current 24-h, continuous emergency readiness with the same crew, to a set-up with two, and up to three, different crews are not found to be socio-economically beneficial.

Search and Rescue and Remote Medical Evacuation in a Norwegian Setting: Comparison of Two Systems

Mortality rates in Norwegian HEMS—a retrospective analysis from Central Norway

Characteristics of patients treated by the Danish Helicopter Emergency Medical Service from 2014-2018: a nationwide population-based study

Air ambulance nurses as expert supplement to local emergency services

Compliance With a National Standard by Norwegian Helicopter Emergency Physicians

Characteristics of the most severely ill and injured patients in a Norwegian helicopter emergency medical service: a retrospective cohort study

Helicopter-Based Search and Rescue Operations in the Dutch Caribbean: A Retrospective Analysis

A socio-economic analysis of increased staffing in the Norwegian helicopter emergency medical service

A Qualitative Review of the Air Rescue One Rural Search and Rescue Program in British Columbia, Canada

Factors influencing on-scene time in a rural Norwegian helicopter emergency medical service: a retrospective observational study

Retrospective comparative analysis of two medical evacuation systems for Ukrainian patients affected by war

Interhospital transport of critically ill patients: experiences and challenges, a qualitative study

Evaluation of prehospital preparedness for major incidents on a national level, with focus on mass casualty incidents

Firefighters and police search dog handlers' experiences working closely with paramedics in urban search and rescue incidents: a qualitative focus group study from Oslo

Incidence and challenges of helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) rescue missions with helicopter hoist operations: analysis of 11,228 daytime and nighttime missions in Switzerland

Psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the hospital survey on patient safety culture in a prehospital environment

Air Medical Support for a Peripheral Hospital in Southern Israel: An Evolving Role for the Air Ambulance and Emergency Department Clinicians

HEMS inter-facility transfer: a case-mix analysis

Recent Outcomes Research in Helicopter Emergency Medical Services: A Scoping Review of Publication Year 2023 Additions to the Helicopter Outcomes Assessment Research Database

Comparison of kinetic changes during helicopter medical evacuations: civilian versus military flights

Republic of Singapore Air Force Helicopter Search-and-Rescue and Medical Evacuations: A 5-Year Review