Chronic Bronchitis and Occupation

A. Cochrane

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.5491.858-b

1966-04-02

British Medical Journal

Abstract:SIR,-In a recent leading article (12 February, p. 375) the following two sentences appear: "The days of major discoveries in medicine by a few talented men using simple equipment are now largely over. Today's elaborate techniques and equipment need large staffs and laboratories." In the opinion ,of the writer, the first of these sentences might be challenged and the second might be qualified. It seems probable that, despite the monumental increase in medical knowledge and, indeed, in all of science in the past five decades, the ratio of the unknown to the known is still approximately infinity. Furthermore, the seeds of most significant advances have been germinated in the minds of individuals and not as a result of group thinking. On the other hand, the exploitation of ideas has unquestionably been enormously implemented by the "elaborate techniques and equipment" which demand interaction between groups of individuals trained in a variety of disciplines. It is the writer's conviction that original concepts of great importance will continue to be the product of the ideas and observations of individuals and that in many instances simple experimental methods will continue to furnish proof of validity. If individual investigators become progressively more dependent upon group endeavour, with everincreasing reliance upon advanced technology, it is conceivable that this kind of mass endeavour may result in the " atrophy through disuse " of those inimitable habits of thought and observation which characterize the gifted individual and which have been the well-spring of the advance of science.-I am, etc.,