Abstract:Technological advances from Industry 1.0 to 4.0, have exercised an increasing influence on prosthetic technology and practices. This paper explores the historical development of the sector within the greater context of industrial revolution. Over the course of the first and up the midpoint of the second industrial revolutions, Industry 1.0 and 2.0, the production and provision of prosthetic devices was an ad hoc process performed by a range of craftspeople. Historical events and technological innovation in the mid-part of Industry 2.0 created an inflection point resulting in the emergence of prosthetists who concentrated solely on hand crafting and fitting artificial limbs as a professional specialty. The third industrial revolution, Industry 3.0, began transforming prosthetic devices themselves. Static or body powered devices began to incorporate digital technology and myoelectric control options and hand carved wood sockets transitioned to laminated designs. Industry 4.0 continued digital advancements and augmenting them with data bases which to which machine learning (M/L) could be applied. This made it possible to use modeling software to better design various elements of prosthetic componentry in conjunction with new materials, additive manufacturing processes and mass customization capabilities. Digitization also began supporting clinical practices, allowing the development of clinical evaluation tools which were becoming a necessity as those paying for devices began requiring objective evidence that the prosthetic technology being paid for was clinically and functionally appropriate and cost effective. Two additional disruptive dynamics emerged. The first was the use of social media tools, allowing amputees to connect directly with engineers and tech developers and become participants in the prosthetic design process. The second was innovation in medical treatments, from diabetes treatments having the potential to reduce the number of lower limb amputations to Osseointegration techniques, which allow for the direct attachment of a prosthesis to a bone anchored implant. Both have the potential to impact prosthetic clinical and business models. Questions remains as to how current prosthetic clinical practitioners will respond and adapt as Industry 4.0 as it continues to shape the sector.

The Locksmith, the Surgeon, and the Mechanical Hand: Communicating Technical Knowledge in Early Modern Europe

Paré and prosthetics: the early history of artificial limbs

Learning medicine by the book: reading and writing surgical manuals in early modern London

Prosthesis and the engineered imagination: reading augmentation and disability across cultural theory, representation and product design

Producers and Consumers Negotiating Scale: Micro-Inventions in Eighteenth-century France and Britain

3D Printing and The Evolution Of Partial Hand Prostheses: My Journey from Theory To Practice

Development of a Prosthetic Hand with Adaptive Grip

[Digital technologies and strategies in amputation medicine]

Limb Prostheses: Industry 1.0 to 4.0: Perspectives on Technological Advances in Prosthetic Care

Medieval orthopaedic history in Germany: Hieronymus Brunschwig and Hans von Gersdorff

Remarkable things: Visual evidence and excess at Charcot's Salpêtrière

Media as modern magic: Early x‐ray imaging and cinematography in Sweden

A scoping review of digital fabrication techniques applied to prosthetics and orthotics: Part 1 of 2—Prosthetics

The Living Machine: A Computational Approach to the Nineteenth-Century Language of Technology

Embodied Manipulation with Past and Future Morphologies through an Open Parametric Hand Design

Drawing Damaged Bodies: British Medical Art in the Early Twentieth Century

Human Hand Anatomy-Based Prosthetic Hand

New developments in prosthetic arm systems

Visible Labour? Productive Forces and Imaginaries of Participation in European Insect Studies, ca. 1680–1810**

Design of the Anatomically Correct, Biomechatronic Hand

The 'scientific artworks' of Doctor Paul Richer