Abstract:It has been seen that among the management approaches encountered in the context of managerial processes in educational institutions, four types of leadership approaches are the most widely used. These are the structural framework of leadership approaches, the human resources framework, the political framework and the symbolic framework. These leadership approaches put forward by Bolman and Deal are basically explained as political, structuralist, symbolic and human resource frameworks. It is aimed to define the works to be done according to the structural framework well and to minimize the problems that may arise as a result of relationships. It is aimed to bring the performance of the staff to the highest level. The goals and objectives of the organization are clear. Managers do not act biased. Managers are always open to change. There is no chain of Decrees and commands between them and the employees. Managers and employees are aware of their responsibilities According to the human resources framework, organizations and people need each other. In the human resources approach, the relationship between a person and an organization is taken into account.Dec. Organizations need people for their needs, and people need the organization for the money, career, and security that organizations will give them. This mutual shopping does not always work healthily. When the relationship between an organization and a person experiences Decadence, one side begins to suffer. According to the political framework, there are political interests for institutions. These interests can be harmful for organizations, as well as useful. The policy followed by the manager determines the goals and objectives of the institution. When the leader starts a job, he decides on the potential gains that may arise from cooperation, short-term goals and whether the work to be done complies with the values of the institution. The leader should explain to the group what he wants and should be able to predict what might happen as a result. According to the symbolic framework, the leader and the employee basically focus on the same goal. In the business environment, the leader thinks that he should know how to deal with conflict. The leader's job is to get to know the partners of the institution, establish relationships with the managers of those institutions, avoid conflict as much as possible and know how to manage his institution in the most efficient way. Key Words: Educational Management, Manager, Leader, Behavioral Models

SITUATIONAL LEADERSHIP MODEL

An empirical taxonomy of leadership situations: Development, validation, and implications for the science and practice of leadership.

The Validity of Hersey and Blanchard's Theory of Leader Effectiveness

Matching leadership styles with employment modes: strategic human resource management perspective

On Leading and Managing: Synonyms or Separate (and Unequal)?

Character Based Leadership

Exploring the Matching Between Leadership Styles and Organizational Situations:Based on the Model of Fuzzy Expert System

Managerial Discretion and Constraints: A Bounded Leadership Model

The Application of Situational Leadership Theory in Situational Simulation Teaching of Personnel Quality Evaluation Course

Matching leadership to circumstances? A vignette study of leadership behavior adaptation in an ambiguous context

The Reflection and Transcend of Leadership Theory

Time-Space Theory of Leadership and Management:A Level-Dimension-Dynamic Comprehensive Analysis Model

Nailing the situational leadership theory by synthesizing the culture and nature of principals' leadership and roles in school

Switching gears: How teams co-construct adaptive leadership style transitions in dynamic contexts

Study shows how cognitive style and personality of leaders determine what they are good at

A Comprehensive Literature Review of Global Leadership Styles: Assessing Universality and Impact on Workforce Motivation

Eğitim Yönetiminde Lider Kişilerin Davranış Modellerinin İncelenmesi

How Do Leaders Cope with the Paradoxical Situations? the Development of Paradoxical Leadership

The Configuration Features of the Leadership Team and Its Countermeasures

Distinguishing Servant Leadership from Transactional and Transformational Leadership

Leadership as a determinant of need fulfillment: implications for meta-theory, methods, and practice