Abstract:Objective To compare clinical anesthesia effects and safety of different ventilation modes for removal of airway foreign bodies in pediatric patients.Methods Eighty pediatric patients were randomly allocated to spontaneous breathing group(n =40) and controlled respiration group (n =40).The patients in spontaneous breathing group received dexmedetomidine at initial dose of 4 μg/kg and propofol at initial dose of 150 μg/(kg.min),followed by continuous infusion of 0.8-1.0 μg/(kg · h) 80-120 μg/(kg · min),respectively.The doses of dexmedetomidine and propfol were adjusted for reserving spontaneous breathing during the procedure.The patients in controlled respiration group received propofol at initial dose of 3-5 mg/kg,remifentanyl at initial dose of 2μg/kg and succinylcholine at initial dose of 2 mg/kg,followed by continuous infusion of 150-200 μg/(kg ·min),0.05 μg/(kg ·min) and intermittent infusion of 2 mg/kg,respectively.Mean arterial pressure (MAP),heart rate (HR),peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2),PET CO2,bispectral index(BIS) were recorded at baseline value before anaesthesia(T0),after induction(T1),after insertion of rigid bronchoscope (T2),at 10 min after insertion of rigid bronchoscope(T3),after the withdrawing of rigid bronchoscope(T4) and at the returning ward (T5).The success rate of first insertion of bronchoscope,the duration of the operation,the recovery time from anesthesia,the success rate of removal of foreign bodies and the condition for perioperative adverse events,such as laryngospasm,arhythmia,body movement,breathing hold,postoperative agitation,hypoxemia,pneumothorax were recorded.Results Compared with T0,HR showed no significant decrease at T1-T5 in controlled respiration group (P ＞ 0.05),while HR decreased significantly at T1-T5 in spontaneous breathing group(P ＜ 0.05).Compared with controlled respiration group,-HR was significantly decreased at T1-T5 in spontaneous breathing group (P ＜ 0.05).Compared with T0,MAP decreased significantly at T1-T5 in controlled respiration group,but MAP was significantly higber in T1-T4 in spontaneous breathing group than in controlled respiration group (P ＜ 0.05).SpO2was significantly higher at T3 in spontaneous breathing group than in controlled respiration group.PET C02 was significantly lower at T4 in spontaneous breathing group than in controlled respiration group.BIS value was significantly lower at T1-T4 in spontaneous breathing group than in controlled respiration group(P ＜0.05).The recovety time was significantly longer in spontaneous breathing group than in controlled respiration group (P ＜ 0.05),but the duration of operation,the incidences of postoperative agitation and hypoxemia were significantly lower in spontaneous breathing group than in controlled respiration group(P ＜ 0.05).The anesthesia effect was significantly better in spontaneous breathing group than in controlled respiration group (P ＜ 0.05).Conclusion Performing ventilation mode of reserving spontaneous breathing for removal of airway foreign bodies in pediatric patients could provide the adequate sedation and reduce the incidence of hypoxemia.But to enhance the perioperative monitoring,timely adjust the depth of anesthesia and prevent the respiratory and circulation depression are necessary.

Comparison of Intubated Versus Nonintubated Airway Management in Children Under General Anesthesia Provided by Dentist Anesthesiologists

Pediatric dentist accessibility and post-operative complications of laryngeal mask airway versus nasotracheal intubation in full mouth rehabilitation under general anaesthesia: a randomised controlled trial

Safety of propofol-assisted deep extubation in the dental treatment of children—a retrospective, observational study

[Comparison of the Children's Oral Health Habits and Oral-Health-related Quality of Life Following Treatment under Dental General Anesthesia and Passive Restraint].

A Retrospective Study of Paediatric Dental Patients Treated under General Anesthesia

Evaluation of General Anesthesia and Sedation and Follow-Up Compliance in Pediatric Dental Procedures: A Comprehensive Analysis of Long-Term Outcomes and Gender Differences

Comparison of long-term dental treatment effects of children treated under general anesthesia and passive restraint

[Postoperative Complications Following Dental Rehabilitation under General Anesthesia in Children].

[A Retrospective Study of 693 Children's Dental Treatment under General Anesthesia].

[Observational study of complications connected with the use of the laryngeal mask airway and sevoflurane anesthesia in children].

[Evaluation of Therapeutic Effect of Children's Dental Treatment under General Anesthesia: 111 Cases Report].

Parental Perspectives on Paediatric Dental Treatment under General Anaesthesia

Restorative and patient factors associated with repeat general anesthesia for dental treatments in young children: A case-control study

Dental Treatment Characteristics of Autistic Children and Differences in Dental Procedures under General Anesthesia Relative to Healthy Counterparts

Pre-school children single inhalation anesthetic exposure and neuro-psychological development: a prospective study and Mendelian randomization analysis

A comparative study of patient satisfaction about anesthesia with dexmedetomidine for ambulatory dental surgery

Laryngeal Mask Airway Versus Endotracheal Tubes for Airway Management During General Anesthesia in Children:A Meta-analysis

Comparison of a Nasal Mask and Traditional Nasal Cannula During Intravenous Anesthesia for Gastroscopy Procedures: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Assessment of the application of double-modified nasopharyngeal airways versus the use of low-flow nasal cannula during pediatric upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: A prospective, randomized, noninferiority, controlled trial

Comparison of clinical efficacy of different ventilation modes for removal of airway foreign bodies in pediatric patients

Comparative evaluation of intranasal dexmedetomidine, intranasal midazolam, and nitrous oxide for conscious sedation of anxious children undergoing dental treatment: A randomized cross-over trial