Factors associated with differential seropositivity to Leptospira interrogans and Leptospira kirschneri in a high transmission urban setting for leptospirosis in Brazil

Daiana de Oliveira,Hussein Khalil,Fabiana Almerinda G. Palma,Roberta Santana,Nivison Nery,Juan C. Quintero-Vélez,Caio Graco Zeppelini,Gielson Almeida do Sacramento,Jaqueline S. Cruz,Ricardo Lustosa,Igor Santana Ferreira,Ticiana Carvalho-Pereira,Peter J. Diggle,Elsio A. Wunder,Albert I. Ko,Yeimi Alzate Lopez,Mike Begon,Mitermayer G. Reis,Federico Costa
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011292
2024-05-19
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Abstract:Leptospirosis is a zoonosis caused by pathogenic species of bacteria belonging to the genus Leptospira . Most studies infer the epidemiological patterns of a single serogroup or aggregate all serogroups to estimate overall seropositivity, thus not exploring the risks of exposure to distinct serogroups. The present study aims to delineate the demographic, socioeconomic and environmental factors associated with seropositivity of Leptospira serogroup Icterohaemorraghiae and serogroup Cynopteri in an urban high transmission setting for leptospirosis in Brazil. We performed a cross-sectional serological study in five informal urban communities in the city of Salvador, Brazil. During the years 2018, 2020 2021, we recruited 2.808 residents and collected blood samples for serological analysis using microagglutination assays. We used a fixed-effect multinomial logistic regression model to identify risk factors associated with seropositivity for each serogroup. Seropositivity to Cynopteri increased with each year of age (OR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01–1.06) and was higher in those living in houses with unplastered walls (exposed brick) (OR 1.68; 95% CI 1.09–2.59) and where cats were present near the household (OR 2.00; 95% CI 1.03–3.88). Seropositivity to Icterohaemorrhagiae also increased with each year of age (OR 1.02; 95% CI 1.01–1.03) and was higher in males (OR 1.51; 95% CI 1.09–2.10), in those with work-related exposures (OR 1.71; 95% CI 1.10–2.66) or who had contact with sewage (OR 1.42; 95% CI 1.00–2.03). Spatial analysis showed differences in distribution of seropositivity to serogroups Icterohaemorrhagiae and Cynopteri within the five districts where study communities were situated. Our data suggest distinct epidemiological patterns associated with the Icterohaemorrhagiae and Cynopteri serogroups in the urban environment at high risk for leptospirosis and with differences in spatial niches. We emphasize the need for studies that accurately identify the different pathogenic serogroups that circulate and infect residents of low-income areas. In this study, we investigated specific epidemiological patterns related to the Icterohaemorrhagiae and Cynopteri serogroups in urban environments at high risk for leptospirosis. Our results indicate that seropositivity for the Cynopteri serogroup increases with age. Seropositivity is also higher in places where houses have unplastered walls and where there are cats in the vicinity of the residences. Seropositivity for the Icterohaemorrhagiae serogroup also increases with age, and is more prevalent in men and in individuals exposed to work or who have contact with sewage. Spatial analysis reveals variations in the distribution of seropositivity for these serogroups within the five urban areas studied. We emphasize the importance of evaluating the epidemiological pattern for the different Leptospira serogroups, since each serogroup may be associated with different animal reservoirs. Our data suggest that the Icterohaemorrhagiae and Cynopteri serogroups present different epidemiological pattern, thus highlighting the need to understand the complex interactions between serogroups and reservoirs. These findings not only contribute to our understanding of the epidemiology of leptospirosis, but also have practical public health implications by helping to identify risk factors and thereby develop more effective preventive measures.
tropical medicine,parasitology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?