Evidence‐based practice attitudes and nutrition support guideline knowledge between holders and nonholders of the Certified Nutrition Support Clinician credential

Lea Steiner,Joachim Sackey,Deborah Cohen,Rebecca Brody
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.11136
2024-02-19
Nutrition in Clinical Practice
Abstract:Background Clinical practice frequently changes, and professionals should stay abreast of evidence‐based practice (EBP) guidelines. Negative attitudes towards EBP are a barrier to guideline adoption. This study explored EBP attitudes and knowledge of a complex nutrition support clinical case scenario of individuals holding or not holding the Certified Nutrition Support Clinician (CNSC) credential. Methods This cross‐sectional study used an online survey sent to American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) members with and without the CNSC credential and all CNSC credential holders from the National Board of Nutrition Support Certification email list. The survey included the Evidence‐Based Practice Attitude Scale Score (EBPAS‐15) and eight knowledge questions using a nutrition support case scenario. An independent samples t test compared knowledge and EBPAS‐15 total scores and subscores between CNSC holders and nonholders. Pearson correlation determined the correlation between knowledge and EBPAS‐15 scores. Results The response rate was 7.8% (N = 706). CNSC holders (n = 536) had significantly higher mean knowledge scores (4.7 ± 1.6 out of 8) than nonholders (n = 159, 4.1 ± 1.7) (P
nutrition & dietetics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?