Abstract:Summary Background Prophylactic passive abdominal drainage is standard practice after distal pancreatectomy. This approach aims to mitigate the consequences of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) but its added value, especially in patients at low risk of POPF, is currently being debated. We aimed to assess the non-inferiority of a no-drain policy in patients after distal pancreatectomy. Methods In this international, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial, we recruited patients aged 18 years or older undergoing open or minimally invasive elective distal pancreatectomy for all indications in 12 centres in the Netherlands and Italy. We excluded patients with an American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status of 4–5 or WHO performance status of 3–4, added by amendment following the death of a patient with ASA 4 due to a pre-existing cardiac condition. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) intraoperatively by permuted blocks (size four to eight) to either no drain or prophylactic passive drain placement, stratified by annual centre volume (<40 or ≥40 distal pancreatectomies) and low risk or high risk of grade B or C POPF. High-risk was defined as a pancreatic duct of more than 3 mm in diameter, a pancreatic thickness at the neck of more than 19 mm, or both, based on the Distal Pancreatectomy Fistula Risk Score. Other patients were considered low-risk. The primary outcome was the rate of major morbidity (Clavien–Dindo score ≥III), and the most relevant secondary outcome was grade B or C POPF, grading per the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery. Outcomes were assessed up to 90 days postoperatively and analysed in the intention-to-treat population and per-protocol population, which only included patients who received the allocated treatment. A prespecified non-inferiority margin of 8% was compared with the upper limit of the two-sided 95% CI (Wald) of unadjusted risk difference to assess non-inferiority. This trial is closed and registered in the Netherlands Trial Registry, NL9116. Findings Between Oct 3, 2020, and April 28, 2023, 376 patients were screened for eligibility and 282 patients were randomly assigned to the no-drain group (n=138; 75 [54%] women and 63 [46%] men) or the drain group (n=144; 73 [51%] women and 71 [49%] men). Seven patients in the no-drain group received a drain intraoperatively; consequently, the per-protocol population included 131 patients in the no-drain group and 144 patients in the drain group. The rate of major morbidity was non-inferior in the no-drain group compared with the drain group in the intention-to-treat analysis (21 [15%] vs 29 [20%]; risk difference –4·9 percentage points [95% CI –13·8 to 4·0]; p non-inferiority =0·0022) and the per-protocol analysis (21 [16%] vs 29 [20%]; risk difference –4·1 percentage points [–13·2 to 5·0]; p non-inferiority =0·0045). Grade B or C POPF was observed in 16 (12%) patients in the no-drain group and in 39 (27%) patients in the drain group (risk difference –15·5 percentage points [95% CI –24·5 to –6·5]; p non-inferiority <0·0001) in the intention-to-treat analysis. Three patients in the no-drain group died within 90 days; the cause of death in two was not considered related to the trial. The third death was a patient with an ASA score of 4 who died after sepsis and a watershed cerebral infarction at second admission, leading to multiple organ failure. No patients in the drain group died within 90 days. Interpretation A no-drain policy is safe in terms of major morbidity and reduced the detection of grade B or C POPF, and should be the new standard approach in eligible patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy. Funding Ethicon UK (Johnson & Johnson Medical, Edinburgh, UK).

Incidence and outcomes of postoperative fluid collections after minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy without placement of surgical drain. A prospective observational cohort study

Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease: a comprehensive review of literature and meta-analysis of outcomes compared with open surgery

Incidence of Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula after Using a Defined Pancreaticojejunostomy Technique for Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Prospective Multicenter Study on 1033 Patients.

The Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Combining with Different Type of Mesentericoportal Vein Resection and Reconstruction for Pancreatic Head Adenocarcinoma: a Chinese Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

Evolution Of Laparoscopic Pancreatic Resections For Pancreatic And Periampullary Diseases: Perioperative Outcomes Of 605 Patients At A High-Volume Center

Safety of Selective Operative Drainage After Pancreatic Resection

Peripancreatic fluid collections following distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy-when is intervention warranted?

Successful Interventional Radiological Management of Postoperative Complications of Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy.

Prospective cohort study on short-term outcomes of 3D-laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy with stented pancreaticogastrostomy

Prophylactic Intra-Peritoneal Drainage After Pancreatic Resection: An Updated Meta-Analysis

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of abdominal fluid collections after pancreatic surgery: Efficacy and long-term follow-up

Drain or No Drain Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: The Unsolved Dilemma

Prophylactic abdominal drainage after distal pancreatectomy (PANDORINA): an international, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial

Natural resolution or intervention for fluid collections in acute severe pancreatitis

Prophylactic intra-peritoneal drain placement following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

[Experience on Postoperative Complications of Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy].

Outcomes after Peripancreatic Fluid Drainage in Patients with Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation

No Need for Routine Drainage After Pancreatic Head Resection: The Dual-Center, Randomized, Controlled PANDRA Trial (ISRCTN04937707)

Intraperitoneal prophylactic drain after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an Italian survey

Perioperative textbook outcomes of minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy: a multicenter retrospective cohort analysis in a Korean minimally invasive pancreatic surgery registry

Application of an Innovative Pancreaticojejunostomy Technique with a Modified Set of Perioperative Management in Pancreatoduodenectomy: a Retrospective Cohort Study.