Pronobesh Banerjee,William M. Hayes,Promothesh Chatterjee,Tamara Masters,Sanjay Mishra,Douglas H. Wedell
Abstract:Abstract Inclusion of a decoy alternative dominated by a target option, but not its competitor, typically leads to increased choice for the target over the competitor, known as the attraction effect. However, the reverse sometimes occurs, known as the repulsion effect. This research tested factors that moderate the repulsion effect in preferential choice scenarios with numerical attributes. Experiment 1 used a between-subjects design with a small set of consumer products and demonstrated robust repulsion effects that did not depend on the relative similarity of the decoy and target. Experiments 2 and 4 used a more powerful within-subjects design along with an expanded set of products and showed that repulsion effects were generally enhanced when the decoy and target had more similar attributes; however, the moderating effect of decoy–target similarity appeared to be fragile and sensitive to stimulus presentation factors. These findings provided mixed support for the hypothesis that the target is tainted by its proximity to the decoy. Experiments 3 and 5 tested whether the extremity of values on the attribute favoring the target moderates the repulsion effect. The results demonstrated that repulsion is more likely when all the alternatives have extremely high values on the target’s better attribute. Extremity of attribute values on the dimension favoring the target may result in a categorical assessment along that dimension and shift focus to the attribute favoring the competitor as one way to foster the repulsion effect.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the paper attempts to solve
This paper attempts to explore the factors that cause the Repulsion Effect (RE) in preference selection. Specifically, the researchers focus on the following two main aspects:
1. **Influence of the similarity between the target and the decoy**:
- **Hypothesis**: According to the "Tainting Hypothesis", when the target option (Target) and the decoy option (Decoy) are more similar in the attribute space, the Repulsion Effect will be stronger. This is because the target option may be "tainted" due to its proximity to the decoy, thus reducing its attractiveness.
2. **Influence of extreme values**:
- **Hypothesis**: When all options have extremely high values on the dominant attribute of the target option, the Repulsion Effect is more likely to occur. This is because decision - makers may ignore these high - value attributes and instead focus on other attributes, resulting in an increased preference for competitors.
### Research background
- **Attraction Effect**: When the target option is superior to the decoy option in some attributes, but the decoy option is inferior to the competitors in these attributes, the probability of choosing the target option will increase.
- **Repulsion Effect**: Contrary to the Attraction Effect, sometimes the introduction of a decoy option will lead to an increased preference for competitors, a phenomenon known as the Repulsion Effect.
### Experimental design
1. **Experiment 1**:
- **Design**: A completely between - groups design was adopted. Participants were faced with a choice task for one of three products: backpacks, grills, or MP3 players. Each option was described by two numerical attributes, and the value on one dimension was always an extreme value (100).
- **Result**: The results showed that regardless of the similarity between the target and the decoy, when all options had extremely high values on the target's dominant attribute, the Repulsion Effect was relatively significant.
2. **Experiment 2**:
- **Design**: A more powerful within - groups design was adopted. Participants were faced with a choice task for 12 different product categories. By manipulating the similarity between the target and the decoy on the low - value dimension (30 - 40 - 10 vs. 70 - 80 - 10), the change in the Repulsion Effect was tested.
- **Result**: The results showed that when the target and the decoy were more similar on the low - value dimension (in the 30 - 40 - 10 condition), the Repulsion Effect was more significant.
### Conclusions
- **Influence of similarity**: The results of Experiment 2 support the "Tainting Hypothesis", that is, the higher the similarity between the target and the decoy in the attribute space, the stronger the Repulsion Effect.
- **Influence of extreme values**: The results of Experiment 1 support the "Extreme - value Hypothesis", that is, when all options have extremely high values on the target's dominant attribute, the Repulsion Effect is more likely to occur.
### Formula representation
- **Logistic regression model**:
\[
\text{logit}(P(\text{selecting competitors}))=\beta_0+\beta_1\text{Decoy}+\beta_2\text{Low Dimension}+\beta_3(\text{Decoy}\times\text{Low Dimension})
\]
where:
- \(P(\text{selecting competitors})\) is the probability of selecting competitors.
- \(\beta_0\) is the intercept.
- \(\beta_1\) is the coefficient of the existence of the decoy.
- \(\beta_2\) is the coefficient of the low - value dimension.
- \(\beta_3\) is the coefficient of the interaction between the existence of the decoy and the low - value dimension.
Through these experiments, the researchers provide a new perspective for understanding the Repulsion Effect and a theoretical basis for future research.