Abstract:Objective: Prediction of outcomes following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) remains challenging, with a lack of standardized tools to guide perioperative management. We used machine learning (ML) to develop automated algorithms that predict outcomes following CEA. Methods: The Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) database was used to identify patients who underwent CEA between 2003 and 2022. We identified 71 potential predictor variables (features) from the index hospitalization (43 preoperative [demographic/clinical], 21 intraoperative [procedural], and 7 postoperative [in-hospital complications]). The primary outcome was stroke or death at 1 year following CEA. Our data were split into training (70%) and test (30%) sets. Using 10-fold cross-validation, we trained six ML models using preoperative features (Extreme Gradient Boosting [XGBoost], random forest, Naïve Bayes classifier, support vector machine, artificial neural network, and logistic regression). The primary model evaluation metric was area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). After selecting the best performing algorithm, additional models were built using intra- and postoperative data. Model robustness was evaluated using calibration plots and Brier scores. Performance was assessed on subgroups based on age, sex, race, ethnicity, insurance status, symptom status, and urgency of surgery. Results: Overall, 166,369 patients underwent CEA during the study period. In total, 7749 patients (4.7%) had the primary outcome of stroke or death at 1 year. Patients with an outcome were older with more comorbidities, had poorer functional status, and demonstrated higher risk anatomic features. They were also more likely to undergo intraoperative surgical re-exploration and have in-hospital complications. Our best performing prediction model at the preoperative stage was XGBoost, achieving an AUROC of 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89-0.91). In comparison, logistic regression had an AUROC of 0.65 (95% CI, 0.63-0.67), and existing tools in the literature demonstrate AUROCs ranging from 0.58 to 0.74. Our XGBoost models maintained excellent performance at the intra- and postoperative stages, with AUROCs of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.89-0.91) and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.93-0.95), respectively. Calibration plots showed good agreement between predicted and observed event probabilities with Brier scores of 0.15 (preoperative), 0.14 (intraoperative), and 0.11 (postoperative). Of the top 10 predictors, eight were preoperative features, including comorbidities, functional status, and previous procedures. Model performance remained robust on all subgroup analyses. Conclusions: We developed ML models that accurately predict outcomes following CEA. Our algorithms perform better than logistic regression and existing tools, and therefore, have potential for important utility in guiding perioperative risk mitigation strategies to prevent adverse outcomes.

Machine Learning to Predict Prostate Artery Embolization Outcomes

A machine learning-based approach for the prediction of periprocedural myocardial infarction by using routine data

Machine Learning to Predict Outcomes of Endovascular Intervention to Treat PAD

Using machine learning to predict outcomes following carotid endarterectomy

Predicting Outcomes Following Lower Extremity Endovascular Revascularization Using Machine Learning

Using Machine Learning to Predict Outcomes Following Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting

Machine learning to predict in-stent stenosis after Pipeline embolization device placement

Predicting Pulmonary Embolism among Hospitalized Patients with Machine Learning Algorithms

Prognostic prediction of cardiovascular adverse events in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention using machine learning

Predicting Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Following Carotid Endarterectomy Using Machine Learning

Prediction of early neurologic deterioration in patients with perforating artery territory infarction using machine learning: a retrospective study

Using machine learning to predict venous thromboembolism and major bleeding events following total joint arthroplasty

Predicting Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Outcomes: A Machine Learning Approach Leveraging a Large Administrative Claims Database

Deep learning and machine learning predictive models for neurological function after interventional embolization of intracranial aneurysms

Prediction of 2-Year Major Adverse Limb Event-Free Survival After Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty and Stenting for Lower Limb Atherosclerosis Obliterans: A Machine Learning-Based Study

Using Machine Learning to Predict Outcomes of Patients with Blunt Traumatic Aortic Injuries

Machine Learning for Outcome Prediction of Acute Ischemic Stroke Post Intra-Arterial Therapy

Identifying racial disparities in adverse dispositions following major surgery for prostate cancer using machine learning.

A machine learning algorithm for peripheral artery disease prognosis using biomarker data

Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Undergoing Endovascular Thrombectomy with Machine Learning

Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Clinical Outcomes in Microsurgical Clipping Treatments of Cerebral Aneurysms