Mixed histiocytic neoplasms: A multicentre series revealing diverse somatic mutations and responses to targeted therapy
Joshua S. Friedman,Benjamin H. Durham,Anne S. Reiner,Mariko Yabe,Kseniya Petrova‐Drus,Ahmet Dogan,Melissa Pulitzer,Klaus J. Busam,Jasmine H. Francis,Raajit K. Rampal,Gary A. Ulaner,Ryan Reddy,Randy Yeh,Vaios Hatzoglou,Mario E. Lacouture,Veronica Rotemberg,Roei D. Mazor,Oshrat Hershkovitz‐Rokah,Ofer Shpilberg,Gaurav Goyal,Ronald S. Go,Jithma P. Abeykoon,Karen Rech,Diana Morlote,Shiraz Fidai,Vedavyas Gannamani,Maryam Zia,Omar Abdel‐Wahab,Katherine S. Panageas,Marc K. Rosenblum,Eli L. Diamond
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.19462
2024-04-13
British Journal of Haematology
Abstract:Novel somatic mutations were identified in mixed histiocytic neoplasms, including KRAS, MAP2K2, MAPK3, non‐V600‐BRAF, RAF1 and BICD2‐BRAF fusion. Targeted treatment was more likely to result in complete response and compared to other treatment modalities. Summary Histiocytic neoplasms are diverse clonal haematopoietic disorders, and clinical disease is mediated by tumorous infiltration as well as uncontrolled systemic inflammation. Individual subtypes include Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH), Rosai–Dorfman–Destombes disease (RDD) and Erdheim–Chester disease (ECD), and these have been characterized with respect to clinical phenotypes, driver mutations and treatment paradigms. Less is known about patients with mixed histiocytic neoplasms (MXH), that is two or more coexisting disorders. This international collaboration examined patients with biopsy‐proven MXH with respect to component disease subtypes, oncogenic driver mutations and responses to conventional (chemotherapeutic or immunosuppressive) versus targeted (BRAF or MEK inhibitor) therapies. Twenty‐seven patients were studied with ECD/LCH (19/27), ECD/RDD (6/27), RDD/LCH (1/27) and ECD/RDD/LCH (1/27). Mutations previously undescribed in MXH were identified, including KRAS, MAP2K2, MAPK3, non‐V600‐BRAF, RAF1 and a BICD2‐BRAF fusion. A repeated‐measure generalized estimating equation demonstrated that targeted treatment was statistically significantly (1) more likely to result in a complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) (odds ratio [OR]: 17.34, 95% CI: 2.19–137.00, p = 0.007), and (2) less likely to result in progression (OR: 0.08, 95% CI: 0.03–0.23, p
hematology