Abstract:Background: The application of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) has been shown to have some benefits in the treatment of preterm infants with respiratory distress. CPAP has the potential to reduce lung damage, particularly if applied early before atelectasis has occurred. Early application may better conserve an infant's own surfactant stores and consequently may be more effective than later application. Objectives: • To determine if early compared with delayed initiation of CPAP results in lower mortality and reduced need for intermittent positive-pressure ventilation in preterm infants in respiratory distress ○ Subgroup analyses were planned a priori on the basis of weight (with subdivisions at 1000 grams and 1500 grams), gestation (with subdivisions at 28 and 32 weeks), and according to whether surfactant was used ▫ Sensitivity analyses based on trial quality were also planned ○ For this update, we have excluded trials using continuous negative pressure SEARCH METHODS: We used the standard search strategy of Cochrane Neonatal to search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2020, Issue 6), in the Cochrane Library; Ovid MEDLINE(R) and Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations Daily and Versions(R); and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literatue (CINAHL), on 30 June 2020. We also searched clinical trials databases and the reference lists of retrieved articles for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs. Selection criteria: We included trials that used random or quasi-random allocation to either early or delayed CPAP for spontaneously breathing preterm infants in respiratory distress. Data collection and analysis: We used the standard methods of Cochrane and Cochrane Neonatal, including independent assessment of trial quality and extraction of data by two review authors. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence. Main results: We found four studies that recruited a total of 119 infants. Two were quasi-randomised, and the other two did not provide details on the method of randomisation or allocation used. None of these studies used blinding of the intervention or the outcome assessor. Evidence showed uncertainty about whether early CPAP has an effect on subsequent use of intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (IPPV) (typical risk ratio (RR) 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43 to 1.38; typical risk difference (RD) -0.08, 95% CI -0.23 to 0.08; I² = 0%, 4 studies, 119 infants; very low-certainty evidence) or mortality (typical RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.43 to 2.03; typical RD -0.02, 95% CI -0.15 to 0.12; I² = 33%, 4 studies, 119 infants; very low-certainty evidence). The outcome 'failed treatment' was not reported in any of these studies. There was an uncertain effect on air leak (pneumothorax) (typical RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.39 to 3.04, I² = 0%, 3 studies, 98 infants; very low-certainty evidence). No trials reported intraventricular haemorrhage or necrotising enterocolitis. No cases of retinopathy of prematurity were reported in one study (21 infants). One case of bronchopulmonary dysplasia was reported in each group in one study involving 29 infants. Long-term outcomes were not reported. Authors' conclusions: All four small trials included in this review were performed in the 1970s or the early 1980s, and we are very uncertain whether early application of CPAP confers clinical benefit in the treatment of respiratory distress, or whether it is associated with any adverse effects. Further trials should be directed towards establishing the appropriate level of CPAP and the timing and method of administration of surfactant when used along with CPAP.

The premature infant's respiratory response to mechanical ventilation

[Application of Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome].

[Lung protective strategies of ventilation in respiratory distress syndrome of neonates].

Premature Infants Show Consistently Good Lung Compliance During Conventional Mechanical Ventilation

Positive Pressure Ventilation in Preterm Infants in the Delivery Room: A Review of Current Practices, Challenges, and Emerging Technologies

Hemodynamic consequences of respiratory interventions in preterm infants

Non-invasive versus invasive respiratory support in preterm infants

Pathophysiologic basis of acute respiratory distress in patients who fail a trial of weaning from mechanical ventilation

Artificial ventilation in severe IRDS using inspiratory plateau, prolonged expiratory time and low frequency

Perioperative Risk Factors for Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation Following Cardiac Surgery in Neonates and Young Infants.

The Predictive Value of Serial Changes in Diaphragm Function During the Spontaneous Breathing Trial for Weaning Outcome: a Study Protocol

Comparison of Efficacy of Pressure Controlled vs. Traditional Manual Mask Ventilation for Newborn Resuscitation - A Simulation-Based Pilot Randomized Control Trial

Lung protective ventilation does not impact left ventricular function in a preterm lamb model

Comparison of noninvasive and intermittent positive pressure ventilation in treating extremely premature and extremely low birth weight infants

Early versus delayed continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for respiratory distress in preterm infants

Cardiorespiratory Monitoring Data to Predict Respiratory Outcomes in Extremely Preterm Infants

Theoretical open-loop model of respiratory mechanics in the extremely preterm infant

Weaning from mechanical ventilation and assessment of extubation readiness

Changes of respiratory system mechanics in ventilated lungs of preterm infants with two different schedules of surfactant treatment

[Application of three kinds of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation as a primary mode of ventilation in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial]

Negative extrathoracic pressure in treatment of respiratory failure in infants and young children