Abstract:Autism, Ahead of Print. Feasible and accurate assessment tools developed for non-specialists are needed to scale community-based models of autism evaluation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate use of the Screening Tool for Autism in Toddlers and Young Children (STAT) when used by primary care practitioners (n = 10) across a statewide system of early diagnosis set within seven United States primary care practices. Specifically, for 130, 14- to 48-month-old children, we examined (1) agreement between STAT classification and Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, Second Edition (ADOS-2) outcome and expert diagnosis of autism, (2) characteristics of children with inaccurate STAT classifications, (3) consistency between STAT classification and primary care practitioner diagnosis, and (4) the relationship between STAT/primary care practitioner classification and expert diagnosis. The STAT demonstrated good concurrent validity with the ADOS-2 (77% agreement). Concordance between specialty trained primary care practitioners with expert diagnosis was 80%–87% across three age-based subgroups of children. Children misclassified by the STAT were older, had higher developmental and adaptive skills, and lower autism symptoms. Primary care practitioner diagnosis aligned with STAT categorical risk classification in 86% of cases, and 73% of consistent classifications between STAT and primary care practitioner diagnosis matched expert diagnosis. Overall, the STAT demonstrates good accuracy when used by non-specialists as part of a diagnostic evaluation.Lay summarySpecialists conduct autism evaluations using tools that are expensive and difficult to get trained on. Families often wait a long time and travel far to get a diagnosis for their child. To help with this problem, primary care practitioners can be trained to provide evaluations in local communities. However, usable and accurate tools developed for non-specialists are needed. The Screening Tool for Autism in Toddlers and Young Children (STAT) was created for this purpose, but limited research has been done on accuracy of the tool in community primary care. This study tested the STAT when used by primary care practitioners as part of a diagnostic evaluation in 130, 14- to 48-month-old children. We tested (1) STAT agreement with the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, Second Edition (ADOS-2), and diagnosis based on an expert research evaluation, and (2) the relationship between STAT classification, primary care practitioner diagnosis, and expert diagnosis. STAT classification matched the ADOS-2 in 77% of cases and expert diagnosis in 78% of cases. Autistic children incorrectly classified by the STAT were older, had higher developmental and adaptive skills, and fewer autism symptoms. In 86% of cases, the STAT classification agreed with primary care practitioner diagnosis. STAT classification, primary care practitioner diagnosis, and expert diagnosis agreed in 73% of cases. Overall, the STAT shows good accuracy when used by primary care practitioners as part of a community primary care autism evaluation.

Toddler Screening for Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy

Screening and diagnostic tools for autism spectrum disorder: Systematic review and meta-analysis

A Direct Comparison of Three Screening Methods for Autism Spectrum Disorder in a High-Likelihood Sibling Population

A Randomized Trial of the Accuracy of Novel Telehealth Instruments for the Assessment of Autism in Toddlers

Primary Care Autism Screening and Later Autism Diagnosis

Autism screening and diagnostic outcomes among toddlers born preterm

Early Autism Screening: A Comprehensive Review

Effect of a Computer-Based Decision Support Intervention on Autism Spectrum Disorder Screening in Pediatric Primary Care Clinics

Accuracy of the Screening Tool for Autism in Toddlers and Young Children in the primary care setting

Development of a school-age extension of the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers through expert consensus and stakeholder input

The Value of Brain Imaging and Electrophysiological Testing for Early Screening of Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review.

Accuracy of Machine Learning Algorithms for the Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies

The Impact of Using Standardized Autism Screening on Referral to Specialist Evaluation for Young Children on the Autism Spectrum – A Cluster-randomized Controlled Trial

Effective And Efficient Visual Stimuli Design For Quantitative Autism Screening: An Exploratory Study

Longitudinal study for the early detection of autism in children with very preterm birth

Diagnostic Accuracy of the Social Attention and Communication Surveillance–Revised With Preschool Tool for Early Autism Detection in Very Young Children

Connecting the Dots: a cluster-randomized clinical trial integrating standardized autism spectrum disorders screening, high-quality treatment, and long-term outcomes

Comparison of the Clancy Autism Behavior Scale and Autism Behavior Checklist for Screening Autism Spectrum Disorder

Screening tools for autism in culturally and linguistically diverse paediatric populations: a systematic review

Developmental characteristics and accuracy of autism screening among two-year-old toddlers in the ECHO program

Clinical Analysis for Diagnosing Autism in Children Under Two: A Case Report