Amniotic Membrane Transplantation in Strabismus Surgery

Rehab Rashad Kassem,Randa Mohamed Abdel-Moneim El-Mofty
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2018.1562555
Abstract:Purpose: Adhesions between the extraocular muscles and surrounding tissues pose a main cause of failure of strabismus reoperations. Amniotic membrane (AM) transplantation during extraocular muscle surgery, to prevent the formation of adhesions, has been a subject of research during the past decade. This review aims to determine the value, indications, and tips on usage of AM transplantation during strabismus surgery. Materials and methods: All references cited in PubMed in English were searched using the key words: amniotic membrane strabismus or amniotic membrane extraocular muscles, and a brief summary of these was described. In addition, certain articles were chosen to provide introductory information on wound healing and fibrosis, AM properties and how it works after transplantation, and AM processing and preservation. Results: AM used for transplantation during extraocular muscle surgery may be cryopreserved, dried, or fresh. It may be oriented with its stroma or epithelium towards the muscle. It may or may not be fixed with sutures. What were the best choices? Various studies attempted to answer these questions. Many of the studies reviewed, however, were inconclusive or contradictory. Fresh AM seemed effective, but carried a risk of transmission of communicable diseases. Dried membrane was not of value in preventing adhesions. Histopathologically, cryopreserved membrane prevented the development of adhesions in the region of its presence, regardless of its orientation, and without the need for suture fixation. To accentuate this histopathological effect during clinical practice, it was recommended to utilize the largest segment possible of cryopreserved membrane and limit its usage to cases where adhesions are expected to be the main cause of failure of strabismus surgery. Conclusion: Cryopreserved AM transplantation was safe and histopathologically effective in preventing adhesions. This effect was, however, less pronounced clinically. Its use during strabismus reoperations is merited if previous recommendations and precautions are considered.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?