Functional improvement in stunned myocardium.

J. Madias

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRC.88.1.8357419

IF: 37.8

1993-07-01

Circulation

Abstract:expected from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in coronary artery disease patients presenting exclusively with ven-tricular fibrillation? JAm Coil Cardiol. 1992;19-208A. Abstract. The report by Ito and colleagues' constitutes an advancement in our capabilities of assessing the progress of functional recovery of postischemic myocardium in patients with acute anterior infarc-tion, particularly because the monitoring of the degrees of residual mechanical impairment was done in the context of the extent of the initial ischemic area at risk. The authors should be commended for combining the information attained by myocardial contrast echocardiography2 and the data from quantitative echocardiographical assessment of regional contraction abnormal-ities3 in some patients who received thrombolysis and some others who were not given such therapy. Although the invasive component of their study (intracoronary injection of contrast solution) constitutes an impediment for routine implementation of this monitoring technique to patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction, further research in this field is needed to investigate the possibility that the segment length of abnormal contraction prior to thrombolysis can be regarded as an index of the ischemic area at risk and that the acquisition of myocardial contrast echocardiographical data may not offer additional information. If such proof becomes available, one can dispense with the intracoronary injection of contrast medium, rendering the method clinically applicable. I have only one criticism with this otherwise excellent study: Because, as the authors stated in "Results," "the value for AS/CD before coronary reflow was 1.00±0.02, suggesting that lengths of segments showing abnormal contraction coincide with those of the contrast defect segment," the essence of such important finding should have been included in the "message" of the article as part of the "clinical implications." Instead, the authors have included in the last paragraph that the "initial infarct size" is of importance for assessment of therapeutic interventions. If they imply that a measure of such variable is the initial endocardial length of abnormal contraction (dyskinesis/akinesis) segment (AS), serial routine echocardiography may suffice; if they mean that "initial infarct size" is only provided by the initial contrast defect segment (CD) (which requires the intracoronary injection of contrast medium), this contradicts their findings (AS/CD=1.00±0.02). Time course of functional improvement in stunned myocardium in risk area in patients with reperfused anterior infarction.trast echocardiography in acute myocardial ischemia, I: in vivo determination of total left ventricular "area at risk. between segmental abnormalities and global left ventricular function in coronary artery disease: validation of a theoretical …