A History of Male Psychological Disorders in Britain, 1945–1980, by Alison Haggett. Mental Health in Historical Perspective. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan, 2015. 215 pp. ISBN 9781137448873 (hb) 9781137448880 (e-bk)
M. Farahani
2016-07-01
Abstract:A History of Male Psychological Disorders in Britain, 1945-1980, by Alison Haggett. Mental Health in Historical Perspective. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan, 2015. 215 pp. ISBN 9781137448873 (hb) 9781137448880 (e-bk). Open access via https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057/9781137448880.pdf"stiff upper lip". Clarified in the framework of socio-medical histories, this is the portrait of a well-informed critique on British psychological disorders, rooted in the cultural context of the 1950s through to the 1980s. Beyond addressing men's mental health, Alison Haggett is adept in reading diverse controversial aspects of British modern life in the aftermath of the First and Second World Wars while re-telling unequivocal consequences of the industrial revolution. In so doing, she has successfully pulled together philosophical, medical, and psychological theories alongside clinicians' objective summaries of certain case works-even after their retirement. Built upon this comprehensive array of cross-disciplinary approaches to men's mental health in Britain by touching on various archival material, Haggett is perhaps too impatient to inform us about the cultural forces that have kept the public (both patients and GPs) misreading the symptoms. Historically, the socio-cultural dimension of British manners has meant that we cannot fully explain why we know so little about men's psychological disorders. Engaging with this seminal argument, Haggett's evaluation of British masculinity attends to two oppositions of "deconstruction" and "disowning" of manliness, rectifying what many medical historians have already ignored. And, unsurprisingly, there is much discussion of embodied pain and somatisation towards the end of Haggett's consistent and coherent evaluation.With a current 75 percent of suicides in Britain occurring among men (Haggett, pp. 2, 50), our normative ideals of singular and hegemonic masculinity are severely threatened if not already wrecked. On the one hand, the merciless post-war competitiveness of industrial work remains to be one persisting factor that has never been fully questioned, particularly concerning its irretrievably destructive outcomes for public health. On the other, feminism- despite facilitating women's access to certain work-related privileges previously only granted to men-has not resolved women's and men's ever-increasing need for psychological support and medical intervention. While women have historically presented to GPs with mood and neurotic disorders, skin complaints, and have been unashamedly concerned about male family members, their medical narratives have been predominantly read in terms of feminine irrationality. Men, by contrast, present with physical symptoms for which Haggett allocates a major part of this refreshing take on male psychological disorders. While a clandestine portraiture of male mental issues is crammed in GPs' numerous records of peptic ulcers, epigastric pain, dyspepsia, and asthma, many medical students graduate by endorsing physically-oriented approaches which may be exacerbated not only by their medical training of professional emotional detachment, but also further reinforced by our cultural demand for concealing emotions in Britain.Haggett argues-more explicitly than I have ever encountered among historians-that there is a clear link connecting the British class system, social norms, medical theories, GP training and prescription patterns, prevalence of depression since the 1970s, and alcohol abuse among both male patients and male physicians. This unfortunate complex lineage of anxiety and concealment has rendered British men helpless in their dysthymic representation, so much so that today somatisation overrules any scientific furthering of Charcot's and Freud's developments in neurasthenia and male hysteria. However, Haggett's analysis stands short of reading the medicalization of emotions for men and women by way of statistical comparisons.At the turn of the century, the WHO Guide to Mental Health in Primary Care (WHO, 2000) showcased the extent to which women are more prescribed with SSRIs than men while women's alcohol intake remains relatively lower. …
History,Sociology,Psychology