UAV and Satellite Synergies for Mapping Grassland Aboveground Biomass in Hulunbuir Meadow Steppe

Xiaohua Zhu,Xinyu Chen,Lingling Ma,Wei Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13071006
2024-04-01
Plants
Abstract:Aboveground biomass (AGB) is an important indicator of the grassland ecosystem. It can be used to evaluate the grassland productivity and carbon stock. Satellite remote sensing technology is useful for monitoring the dynamic changes in AGB across a wide range of grasslands. However, due to the scale mismatch between satellite observations and ground surveys, significant uncertainties and biases exist in mapping grassland AGB from satellite data. This is also a common problem in low- and medium-resolution satellite remote sensing modeling that has not been effectively solved. The rapid development of uncrewed aerial vehicle (UAV) technology offers a way to solve this problem. In this study, we developed a method with UAV and satellite synergies for estimating grassland AGB that filled the gap between satellite observation and ground surveys and successfully mapped the grassland AGB in the Hulunbuir meadow steppe in the northeast of Inner Mongolia, China. First, based on the UAV hyperspectral data and ground survey data, the UAV-based AGB was estimated using a combination of typical vegetation indices (VIs) and the leaf area index (LAI), a structural parameter. Then, the UAV-based AGB was aggregated as a satellite-scale sample set and used to model satellite-based AGB estimation. At the same time, spatial information was incorporated into the LAI inversion process to minimize the scale bias between UAV and satellite data. Finally, the grassland AGB of the entire experimental area was mapped and analyzed. The results show the following: (1) random forest (RF) had the best performance compared with simple regression (SR), partial least squares regression (PLSR) and back-propagation neural network (BPNN) for UAV-based AGB estimation, with an R2 of 0.80 and an RMSE of 76.03 g/m2. (2) Grassland AGB estimation through introducing LAI achieved higher accuracy. For UAV-based AGB estimation, the R2 was improved by an average of 10% and the RMSE was reduced by an average of 9%. For satellite-based AGB estimation, the R2 was increased from 0.70 to 0.75 and the RMSE was decreased from 78.24 g/m2 to 72.36 g/m2. (3) Based on sample aggregated UAV-based AGB and an LAI map, the accuracy of satellite-based AGB estimation was significantly improved. The R2 was increased from 0.57 to 0.75, and the RMSE was decreased from 99.38 g/m2 to 72.36 g/m2. This suggests that UAVs can bridge the gap between satellite observations and field measurements by providing a sufficient training dataset for model development and AGB estimation from satellite data.
plant sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the estimation of above - ground biomass (AGB) of grasslands in large - scale monitoring. Specifically, due to the scale mismatch between satellite observations and ground surveys, there are significant uncertainties and biases when using satellite data to map grassland AGB. This is a common problem in low - and medium - resolution satellite remote - sensing modeling and has not been effectively resolved yet. The rapid development of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) technology makes it possible to solve this problem. The paper proposes a method that combines UAV and satellite data to estimate grassland AGB, aiming to bridge the gap between satellite observations and ground surveys, and has successfully mapped AGB in the Hulunbuir grassland in the northeast of Inner Mongolia. The main research questions of the paper include: 1. How applicable are common regression models (simple regression, partial least - squares regression, back - propagation neural network, and random forest) in grassland AGB estimation? 2. How much can the accuracy of grassland AGB estimation be improved after introducing the structural parameter leaf area index (LAI)? 3. How can the scale effect be reduced when mapping grassland AGB by integrating UAV and satellite data? 4. What are the effects of grassland restoration measures such as fertilization and mowing on grassland AGB?