Abstract:Over 1.3 million people die each year as a result of traffic collisions and hundreds of thousands of others are permanently and seriously injured. Most of these deaths occur in low‐ and middle‐income countries, where mortality rates can be up to 10 times higher than those of some high‐income countries. Seat belts are designed to accomplish two key functions – to prevent the occupant from being ejected from the vehicle by the force of impact, and to extend the time that the decelerating force is applied to a person. Seat belts also spread the area of impact both to larger and less vulnerable parts of the body. Since the 1950s, seat belts have been factory‐fitted to most vehicles, and today around 90% of high‐income countries have adopted seat belt legislation that makes it mandatory for some, if not all, vehicle occupants to wear seat belts. However, the simple passing of laws is not sufficient to ensure seat belt use, and, while the enforcement of seat belt laws does increase seat belt use, other interventions have been developed to encourage voluntary – and hence sustainable – behaviour change. To evaluate the benefits of behavioural‐change interventions (educational‐based, incentive‐based, engineering‐based, or a combination, but not enforcement‐based) that promote the use of seat belts, and to determine which types of interventions are most effective. On 9 August 2022, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), OvidSP Embase, OvidSP MEDLINE, 14 other databases, and clinical trials registers. We also screened reference lists and conference proceedings, searched websites of relevant organisations, and contacted road safety experts. The search was performed with no restrictions in terms of language and date of publication. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), both individually randomised and cluster‐randomised, that evaluated education, engineering, incentive‐based interventions (or combinations) that promoted seat belt use. Two review authors independently assessed the eligibility of RCTs, evaluated the risk of bias, and extracted data. We performed a narrative synthesis based on effect direction due to the heterogeneity observed between RCTs and reported the synthesis in accordance with reporting guidelines for systematic reviews without meta‐analysis, as appropriate. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. We analysed data on the primary outcome, frequency of wearing a seat belt. None of the included RCTs reported the other primary outcome, crash‐related injury rate or the secondary outcome, crash‐related mortality rates of interest in this review. We included 15 completed RCTs (12 individual, parallel‐group, and three cluster) that enroled 12,081 participants, published between 1990 and 2022. Four trials were published between 2019 and 2022, and the remaining trials were published 10 or more years ago. We also identified four ongoing RCTs. Thirteen RCTs were conducted in the USA. Trials recruited participants from various sites (worksites, schools, emergency departments, a residential retirement community, and primary care settings) and different age groups (adults, late adolescents, early adolescents, and dyads). Thirteen trials investigated educational interventions, one of which used education in addition to incentives (one of the intervention arms) measured through participant self‐reports (12) and observation (one), and two trials investigated engineering‐based interventions measured through in‐vehicle data monitor systems at various follow‐up periods (six weeks to 36 months). We grouped RCTs according to types of education‐based interventions: behavioural education‐based, health risk appraisal (HRA), and other education‐based interventions. The evidence suggests that behavioural education‐based (four trials) interventions may promote seat belt use and HRA interventions (one trial) likely promote seat belt use in the short term (six weeks to nine months). Four of the six trials that investigated behavioural education‐based interventions found that the intervention compared to no or another intervention may promote seat belt use. These effects were measured through participant self‐report and at various time points (six‐week to 12‐month follow‐up) (low‐certainty evidence). One of the three trials investigating HRA only or with additional intervention versus no or another intervention showed observed effects likely to promote seat belt use (moderate‐certainty evidence). The evidence suggests that engineering‐based interventions using vehicle monitoring systems (with in‐vehicle alerts and with or without notifications/feedback) may promote the use of seat belts. One trial showed that engineering interventions (in‐vehicle alerts and feedback) may promote seat belt use while the other showed unclear effects in two of the three intervention groups (low‐certainty evidence). Both -Abstract Truncated-

Observations on the Aetiology and Treatment of Anaemia in Kwashiorkor*

Interventions for control of road traffic injuries: review of effectiveness literature

Cost-Effectiveness of Population Level and Individual Level Interventions to Combat Non-communicable Disease in Eastern Sub-Saharan Africa and South East Asia: A WHO-CHOICE Analysis

Road Safety in Low-Income Countries: State of Knowledge and Future Directions

Cost-utility analysis of an alcohol policy in Thailand: a case study of a random breath testing intervention

What makes a good anti-inflammatory drug target?

Effectiveness of road safety interventions: An evidence and gap map

Environmental measures to improve pedestrian safety in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review

[Original contributions of Latin Americans to anesthesiology].

Comparative Power Analysis of an Adaptive Bus Encoding Method on the MBUS Structure

Assessing the effect of automated speed enforcement and comprehensive measures on road safety in Rwanda

Safer spaces: The impact of a reduction in road fatalities on the life expectancy of South Africans

Cost-effectiveness analysis of population-based tobacco control strategies in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases in Tanzania

Appraising road safety attainment by CRITIC-ELECTRE-FCM: A policymaking support for Southeast Asia

Possible methodological reason for the finding that "Neither tax increase nor reimbursement reduced health disparities": comment on the article by by Over et al. (2014).

Education, incentive, and engineering-based interventions to promote the use of seat belts

High road utilizers surveys compared to police data for road traffic crash hotspot localization in Rwanda and Sri Lanka.

Methods of strategic road safety management: a systematic review

Liquid scintillation spectrometry of tritium-labeled proteins separated by disc electrophoresis.

Techno-economic evaluation of corrective actions for efficient attainment of (N−1)-security in operation and planning

Statistical estimation of fatal and serious injuries saved by iRAP protocols in 74 countries