User perspective on receiving adaptive equipment after stroke: A mixed-methods study

Pauline Boland,William M M Levack,Fiona P Graham,Meredith A Perry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0008417418800834
Abstract:Background.: Adaptive equipment (AE) is frequently provided during stroke rehabilitation by occupational therapists. Purpose.: This study aimed to identify the AE that people typically use after a stroke and the outcomes achieved as a result, and to explore people's experiences obtaining and using AE, to inform both practice and policy in this field. Method.: A mixed-methods study, involving a postal questionnaire and interviews, used descriptive statistics and grounded theory to analyze the quantitative and qualitative data, respectively. Findings.: Questionnaire data ( n = 258) revealed mobility AE was issued most frequently, with increased safety as the primary reported outcome. Interview data ( n = 15) indicated relationships with health professionals and the hospital environment shaped early AE selection and use. Once home, making sense of AE and community participation were more influential. Implications.: Therapeutic relationships and reflection time are critical to maximize AE use after stroke. Policy and related funding for AE need to prioritize community participation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?