Abstract:Introduction The use of free‐style and propeller perforator‐based flaps has been popularized for the reconstruction of moderate size defects in the trunk and extremities, while their application in the field of abdominal reconstruction is seldom reported. The purpose of this report is to describe the authors experience with the use of pedicled perforator‐based flaps in abdominal wall reconstruction, presenting the innovative concept of transition from angiosomal to bi‐angiosomal and extra‐angiosomal perforator flaps and showing applications of the different flap designs according to the multiple clinical scenarios. Patients and Methods A total of 15 patients underwent abdominal wall reconstruction with angiosomal, bi‐angiosomal, and extra‐angiosomal pedicled perforator‐based flaps harvested from the surrounding abdominal subunits for superficial or full thickness defects of the abdominal wall of moderate and large dimensions. The defects were consequent to soft‐tissue sarcomas (STS) and non‐melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) resection in 11 and 4 cases, respectively. Operative data, post‐operative course, and complications were recorded. Moreover, at 12 months follow‐up, patients were asked to rate the esthetic and functional outcomes of the reconstructive procedure on a 5‐point Likert scale. Results Ten angiosomal perforator flaps (4 DIEP, 4 SCIP, 1 SEAP, and 1 LICAP flaps) and 5 bi‐angiosomal and extra‐angiosomal conjoined perforator flaps including different vascular territories (3 bilateral DIEP, 1 bilateral SEAP, and 1 ipsilateral DIEP‐SEAP flap) were successfully transferred in 15 patients. In two patients, microsurgical anastomoses were performed to guarantee proper vascularization of the additional cutaneous territory. Mean age was 59.3 years. Defect sizes ranged from 98 to 408 cm2 (mean size was 194.7 cm2). Mean operative time was 280 min. Flap surface ranged from 108 to 336 cm2 (mean surface was 209.3 cm2). No major complications were registered. One bi‐angiosomal bilateral DIEP flap suffered from partial necrosis and required an additional flap reconstruction. All patients underwent a 12‐month follow‐up except one, who did not show for clinical follow‐up but responded at the Likert scale at clinical follow‐up at 9 months. Overall patients' satisfaction was high, with mean esthetic and functional ratings of 4.27 and 3.87. Conclusion The use of local tissues is an under‐utilized solution in the field of abdominal wall reconstruction. Angiosomal, bi‐angiosomal, and extra‐angiosomal perforator flaps proved to be a reliable option to provide the transfer of a significant amount of tissue and offer like with like reconstruction while maximizing flap survival.

Innovative Reuse of Breast Expander Capsules for Parietal Pleura Repair in DIEP Flap Surgeries

Purse-String DIEPplasty: A Technique to Improve Aesthetic Outcome of Autologous Breast Reconstruction

Modern approaches to alternative flap-based breast reconstruction: stacked deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps

Alternatives to the Gold Standard: A Systematic Review of Profunda Artery Perforator and Lumbar Artery Perforator Flaps for Breast Reconstruction

Observation on the therapeutic effects of breast reconstruction using deep inferior epigastric perforator flap after resection of breast cancer

Asymmetric Four-Flap Breast Reconstruction with DIEP Flaps and PAP Flaps

The first 150 consecutive DIEP free flaps: Lessons learnt and a guide to efficiency for the junior plastic surgeon

Transabdominal Robotic Harvest of Bilateral DIEP Pedicles in Breast Reconstruction: Technique and Interdisciplinary Approach

Isolated post laparoscopic DIEA injury in bilateral DIEP breast reconstruction

New Applications of the Anterior Intercostal Artery Perforator Flap for Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction in the Setting of Postoperative Radiotherapy

Patient-reported and surgical outcomes of Profunda Artery Perforator (PAP) Flap Breast Reconstructions compared to Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) using BREAST-Q

Optimizing Intraflap Anastomosis of Conjoined Bilateral DIEP Flap for Breast Reconstruction: Planning, Execution and Outcomes in 201 patients

Pre-expanded thin DIEP free flap in pediatric upper extremity reconstruction for burn sequelae: A case report

Robotic Repair: An Alternative Technique for Rectus Diastasis and Abdominal Bulge Following DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction

Interdisciplinary Treatment of Breast Cancer After Mastectomy With Autologous Breast Reconstruction Using Abdominal Free Flaps in a University Teaching Hospital—A Standardized and Safe Procedure

Volumetric Planning Using Computed Tomographic Angiography Improves Clinical Outcomes in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction

Preoperative computed tomography assessment for a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap: a new easy technique from the Bologna experience

Hug Flap and Hamdi Hammock: Two Innovative Techniques for Enhancing Aesthetic Outcomes in Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Breast Reconstruction

Strategically shifting paradigms: the new era of DIEP flaps with minimally invasive mastectomy: a retrospective cross-sectional study

Optimizing perioperative strategies to maximize success with prepectoral breast reconstruction

From Angiosomal to Bi‐Angiosomal and Extra‐Angiosomal Pedicled Perforator Flaps: Optimizing the Use of Local Tissues in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction