Abstract:Background The usage of drug coated ballons (DCB) in percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) is rising. Initially applied in in-stent restenosis (ISR), wider clinical applications especially in de novo lesions (DNL) are discussed. Here we aim to assess the pattern of usage as well as the clinical and angiographic outcomes associated with DCB. Methods For this analysis we included all patients treated with DCB during PCI, at a tertiary care centre between 01/2015 and 12/2021. Cath lab results of all patients were screened to assess the DCB indication. Patients were followed up until 09/2022 to assess clinical as well as angiographic complications. Results A total of 7608 interventions were carried out between 2015 and 2021, in 462 (6.1%) a DCB was used. The median follow-up time were 3.1 years (IQR 1.6 to 4.4 years), the median age of our patient population was 66 (IQR 58-75) and 24.7% (n=114) were female. There were 92 of 462 (19.9%) cases including a DNL preparation, 335 (72.5%) cases treating an ISR, in 6 (1.3%) cases both, DNL and ISR were treated, and in 29 (6.3%) cases DCB were used for other reasons (e.g. pre-/ postdilatation in coronary stenting). The mean DCB inflation diameter was significantly higher in ISR with 3.50mm (IQR 3.0-3.5mm) compared to DNL with 2.50mm (2.00-2.50mm, p-value <0.001 ) While the number of DCBs used is rising over time (179 cases [38.7%] in 2015-2018, 283 cases [61.3%] in 2019-2021), the proportion of de novo lesions showed no significant difference (37/179 [20.7%] in 2015-2018, 61/282 [21.6%] in 2019-2021, p-value 0.806, Figure 1). Patients with DCB for ISR had significantly higher rates of arterial hypertension (ISR: 255 [76.1%], DNL: 57 [62.0%], both: 3 [50.0%], other: 20 [69.0%] p value 0.029), hyperlipidaemia (ISR: 228 [68.1%], DNL: 56 [60.9%], both: 2 [33.3%], other: 14 [48.3%], p value 0.041) and previous myocardial infarction (ISR: 231 [69.0%], DNL: 33 [35.9%], both: 2 [33.3%], other: 8 [27.6%], p-value <0.001). When analysing the outcomes, patients with DNL showed lower rates of acute myocardial infarction (8 [8.2%] vs 51 [15.0%]) as well as target lesion (6 [6.1%] vs 56 [16.5%]) and any revascularization (27 [27.6%] vs 122 [35.9%])%]), yet a higher rate of cardiovascular mortality (19 [5.6] vs 9 [9.2%]) during the follow up period compared to patients treated for ISR (Figure 2). Both groups showed a very low rate of target lesion thrombosis within 30 days after PCI (1 [1.0%] vs 1 [0.3%], p-value 0.745). Conclusions The use of DCB in PCIs is increasing, yet as we were able to emphasize with our data, they are primarily used in ISR as well as lesions with a small vessel diameter with favourable outcomes indicated by low event rates. Research should expand beyond small-vessel disease and ISR to assess safety and outcomes of DCB in DNL, larger vessels and bifurcation interventions with one stent to further assess its potential benefits in a wider field of indications.

Prospective, large-scale multicenter trial for the use of drug-coated balloons in coronary lesions: The DCB-only All-Comers Registry

Clinical Observation of Simple Drug Coated Balloon Angioplasty in the Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions

Biolimus-coated Versus Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons for Coronary In-Stent Restenosis (BIO ASCEND ISR): a Randomised, Non-Inferiority Trial.

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Drug-Coated Balloon-Only Strategy in de novo Lesions of Large Coronary Arteries

Drug‐coated Balloon for the Treatment of Small Vessel Disease: 9 Months of Angiographic Results and 12 Months of Clinical Outcomes of the PEPCAD China SVD Study

Efficacy of Drug-Coated Balloon Approaches for de novo Coronary Artery Diseases: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis

Usage patterns and outcomes of drug coated ballons at a tertiary care center - a cohort analysis in 462 patients

Drug-coated balloons for coronary artery disease: An updated review with future perspectives

Drug-Coated Balloons for Coronary Artery Disease: Third Report of the International DCB Consensus Group

Drug-Coated balloons vs drug-eluting stents for the treatment of small coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of randomized trials

Clinical Impact of Drug-Coated Balloon–Based Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease

Impact of Drug-Coated Balloon-Based Revascularization in Patients with Chronic Total Occlusions

A Non-inferiority, Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Versus New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents on Angiographic Outcomes for Coronary De Novo Lesions

Drug-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent revascularization in the treatment of de novo acute myocardial infarction

Drug-Coated Balloons in the Management of Coronary Artery Disease

A Meta-Analysis of 3-Year Outcomes of Drug-Coated Balloons Versus Drug-Eluting Stents for Small-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease

Procedural characteristics and cardiovascular outcomes in patients undergoing drug-coated balloon angioplasty for de novo lesions in large coronary arteries: an observational study

Drug-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent for de novo culprit lesion in acute coronary syndromes: a report from nationwide registry in japan

One-Year Outcome of Drug-Coated Balloon vs. Drug-Eluting Stent in Patients Undergoing Initial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) for De Novo Lesion

Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty vs Plain Balloon Angioplasty in patients with coronary In-Stent Restenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Comprehensive clinical outcomes of drug‐coated balloon treatment for coronary artery disease. Insights from a single‐center experience