Usefulness of contrast stress-echocardiography or exercise-electrocardiography to predict long-term acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting with chest pain without electrocardiographic abnormalities or 12-hour troponin elevation.

N. Gaibazzi,C. Reverberi,L. Badano

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.08.066

2011-01-15

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Occupational Segregation and Its Effect on Estimates of the Gender Wage Differential:Evidence from 2002 UHS Data

YAO Xian-guo,HUANG Zhi-ling

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-5831.2008.02.010

2008-01-01

Abstract:Using 2002 urban household surveys(UHS) data,we find male employees are paid approximately 31% more than their female counterparts.In this paper,we use the wage decomposition proposed by Brown which takes into account occupational differences.We find the unexplained component accounts for approximately 72% of the overall gender wage differential and most of which within intra-occupational,people always relates this unexplained potion to discrimination,on the other hand,28% is due to effects of difference in individual characteistics.This indicates in order to effectively reduce the gender wage difference,we should not only take action to imprave women's human capital stock,but also adopt a series of policies to eliminate the discrimination on the market,secure the employment status of women.
Salary, flexibility or career opportunity? A choice experiment on gender specific job preferences

Madlaina Jost,Sara Möser

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1154324

2023-04-17

Frontiers in Sociology

Abstract:Using the evaluation of hypothetical job offers in a discrete choice experiment, we analyse which characteristics of employment positions are relevant to men and women when deciding between job offers. Thereby, we investigate whether preferences for work arrangements are gender specific. The analysis shows that on average, women have a stronger preference for part-time work than men, and that the career prospect of a job is more important to men than to women. Furthermore, we use heterogeneity within genders to study whether gender specific preference patterns result from gendered considerations of family formation. We find that certain men and women, especially those who plan to have children and have traditional intentions about the division of labor in the household, evaluate work relationships more strongly according to gender roles than others. This analysis of hypothetical employment choices provides valuable insight into the preference structure of men and women, which proves to be heterogeneous within and between genders.
Gender Differences in Wage Expectations

Ana Fernandes,Martin Huber,Giannina Vaccaro

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250892

2020-03-26

Abstract:Using a survey on wage expectations among students at two Swiss institutions of higher education, we examine the wage expectations of our respondents along two main lines. First, we investigate the rationality of wage expectations by comparing average expected wages from our sample with those of similar graduates; we further examine how our respondents revise their expectations when provided information about actual wages. Second, using causal mediation analysis, we test whether the consideration of a rich set of personal and professional controls, namely concerning family formation and children in addition to professional preferences, accounts for the difference in wage expectations across genders. We find that males and females overestimate their wages compared to actual ones, and that males respond in an overconfident manner to information about outside wages. Despite the attenuation of the gender difference in wage expectations brought about by the comprehensive set of controls, gender generally retains a significant direct, unexplained effect on wage expectations.

General Economics
Women’s aversion to majors that (seemingly) require systemizing skills causes gendered field of study choice

Benita Combet

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcad021

2023-04-11

European Sociological Review

Abstract:Abstract This article examines whether gender differences in preferences for field of study characteristics can explain gendered major choice. Specifically, this study focuses on a broad range of subject characteristics that are often simultaneously present: systemizing skills required (math intensity, reasoning style, affinity for technical work tasks), future job characteristics corresponding with the male breadwinner model (materialism, work–family compatibility), and characteristics invoked by behavioural preferences (risky situations and a competitive environment). To disentangle these co-occurring characteristics and minimize the influence of other factors in the decision-making process (e.g. admission likelihood), this study uses a choice experiment incorporated in the Swiss panel study TREE. In it, a representative sample of high school students choose their preferred field of study from two artificial fields with varying characteristics. The results show the largest gender differences in preferences for characteristics related to reasoning style (abstract versus creative) and affinity for work tasks (technical versus social), and smaller differences for math intensity, competitive climate, and work–family compatibility, while there are no gender differences in preferences for materialistic characteristics (salary and prestige). Unexpectedly, the gender differences are primarily caused by female students’ preferences, while male students are neutral towards most characteristics.

sociology
Gender differences in wage expectations and negotiation

Lukas Kiessling,Pia Pinger,Philipp Seegers,Jan Bergerhoff

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2024.102505

IF: 1.893

2024-04-01

Labour Economics

Abstract:This paper presents evidence from a large-scale study on gender differences in expected wages before labor market entry. Based on data for over 15,000 students, we document a significant and large gender gap in wage expectations that resembles actual wage differences, prevails across subgroups, and along the entire distribution. Over the life-cycle this gap amounts to roughly half a million Euros. Our findings further suggest that expected wages relate to expected asking and reservation wages and that a difference in plans about “boldness” during prospective wage negotiations pertains to gender difference in expected and actual wages. Given the importance of wage expectations for labor market decisions, household bargaining, and wage setting, our results provide an explanation for persistent gender inequalities.

economics
A Global Study of Pay Preferences and Employee Characteristics

Dow Scott,Michelle Brown,John Shields,Richard J. Long,Conny H. Antoni,Ewa J. Beck-Krala,Ana Maria Lucia-Casademunt,Stephen J. Perkins

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0886368715598197

2015-03-01

Abstract:Companies are managing more diverse work forces, and pay systems must be designed to attract, retain and motivate employees who may have very different pay preferences from employees of even a decade ago. This study examines how employee characteristics (i.e., gender, age, education, work experience, annual pay and number of dependents) are related to pay preferences. We found that older respondents with more education and more dependents had a stronger preference for variable pay than did respondents who were younger, less educated and had fewer dependents. Older respondents and those with higher pay preferred less pay transparency than did younger and lower paid respondents. Pay differences based on capability were preferred by better educated employees. When controlling for the other demographic characteristic, we found significant differences among nationalities for all four measures of pay preferences, that is, pay differences, pay variability, bonus plans and pay transparency.
GENDER DIFFERENCES IN THE VALUATION OF EMPLOYER-PROVIDED HEALTH INSURANCE

NASSER DANESHVARY,TERRENCE M. CLAURETIE

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2007.0057.x

2007-10-01

Economic Inquiry

Abstract:We present evidence that accurate estimates of the labor‐earning/employer‐provided health insurance trade‐off must account for two different effects: the heterogeneity of jobs and the endogeneity of health insurance. The size of the trade‐off depends on employees’ contribution to premiums, health‐care needs, and valuation of insurance. We use Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data and instrumental variables/two‐stage least squares. On average, workers accept about 16.5% to 20% lower earnings in return for insurance, and married women value insurance by about 3.5 percentage points more than married men, explaining about 3% of the gender‐earning differentials. Health insurance does not contribute to the unexplained portion of the gender‐pay gap. (JEL J3, J7, I1)

economics
Gender differences and similarities in work preferences: Results from a factorial survey experiment

Sara Seehuus

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00016993211060241

2021-11-29

Acta Sociologica

Abstract:Despite increased gender equality in many arenas in most of the Western world, women and men continue to choose different educational paths; this is one reason for the persistent gender segregation in the labour market. Cultural and economic explanations for occupational gender segregation both contend that gendered career choices reflect gendered preferences. By analysing data from a multifactorial survey experiment conducted in Norway, designed to isolate the preferences for occupations from preferences for job attributes with which occupation is often correlated: pay; type of position; and amount of work, this article examines whether and to what extent boys and girls who have not yet entered the labour market have different preferences for different work dimensions. The study shows some gender differences in occupational preferences, while also demonstrating similarities in boys’ and girls’ preferences for work dimensions, such as pay and working hours. This indicates that attributes tested by the experiment, which are typically associated with gendered occupations, cannot independently explain why boys and girls tend to have divergent occupational preferences. Importantly, however, the results suggest that boys’ reluctance to undertake some female-typed occupations might be reduced if they did not pay less than male-typed occupations requiring the same level of education.

sociology
What men and women value at work: implications for workplace health

Michael Peterson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s1550-8579(04)80016-0

Abstract:Background: Current research suggests that workplace culture can influence health outcomes. Objective: This study was conducted to determine what men and women value at work, how each defines a healthy workplace, and what work factors best predict their health outcomes and stress. Methods: A national study was conducted by LLuminari, Inc., a health education company, via a Harris Interactive Inc. online panel that screened for US participants who were employed full-time in organizations with >1000 employees. The online questionnaire used stimulus words/phrases to which respondents verbally free-associated. Each verbatim response was given a weighted score based on the order in which it was written, then thermatically clustered with similar responses to form categories for each stimulus item. Results: A total of 1123 individuals participated in the study (608 males, 515 females). Results indicated that men and women value the same aspects of work but ranked them differently. Men valued pay, money, and benefits, as well as power, authority, and status significantly more than women did (P < 0.001). Women valued the following significantly more than men did: friends and relationships (P < 0.05); recognition and respect (P < 0.001); communication (P < 0.001); fairness and equity (P < 0.001); teams and collaboration (P < 0.001); family and home (P < 0.001). The results also indicated that men underestimate and are generally unaware of women's work-related values (P < 0.05). In comparison, women overestimate how men value pay, money, and benefits, and power, authority, and status (P < 0.05). Although little difference was observed in health status between the sexes, women did report being slightly more distressed at work. Findings also suggested that the cultural and environmental aspects of work best predicted women's health outcomes; for men, health outcomes were related to supervision and management factors. The health of both sexes was significantly predicted by their perceived home life (P < 0.001). Men and women also defined a healthy workplace differently, with women more than men emphasizing understanding, support, communication (P < 0.05), relationships, and ethics (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Knowing and managing gender differences may help to effectively motivate employees, increase productivity, foster loyalty, and improve physical and mental well-being.
Heterogeneous Major Preferences for Extrinsic Incentives: The Effects of Wage Information on the Gender Gap in STEM Major Choice

Yanqing Ding,Wei Li,Xin Li,Yinduo Wu,Jin Yang,Xiaoyang Ye

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-021-09636-w

2021-01-01

Research in Higher Education

Abstract:Despite the growing evidence of informational interventions on college and major choices, we know little about how such light-touch interventions affect the gender gap in STEM majors. Linking survey data to administrative records of Chinese college applicants, we conducted a large-scale randomized experiment to examine the STEM gender gap in the major preference beliefs, application behaviors, and admissions outcomes. We find that female students are less likely to prefer, apply to, and enroll in STEM majors, particularly Engineering majors. In a school-level cluster randomized controlled trial, we provided treated students with major-specific wage information. Students’ major preferences are easily malleable that 39% of treated students updated their preferences after receiving the wage informational intervention. The wage informational intervention has no statistically significant impacts on female students’ STEM-related major applications and admissions. In contrast, those male students in rural areas who likely lack such information are largely shifted into STEM majors as a result of the intervention. We provide supporting evidence of heterogeneous major preferences for extrinsic incentives: even among those students who are most likely to be affected by the wage information (prefer high paying majors and lack the wage information), female students are less responsive to the informational intervention.
Do Women Choose Different Jobs from Men? Mechanisms of Application Segregation in the Market for Managerial Workers

Roxana Barbulescu,Matthew Bidwell

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0757

2013-06-01

Organization Science

Abstract:This paper examines differences in the jobs for which men and women apply in order to better understand gender segregation in managerial jobs. We develop and test an integrative theory of why women might apply to different jobs than men. We note that constraints based on gender role socialization may affect three determinants of job applications: how individuals evaluate the rewards provided by different jobs, whether they identify with those jobs, and whether they believe that their applications will be successful. We then develop hypotheses about the role of each of these decision factors in mediating gender differences in job applications. We test these hypotheses using the first direct comparison of how similarly qualified men and women apply to jobs, based on data on the job searches of MBA students. Our findings indicate that women are less likely than men to apply to finance and consulting jobs and are more likely to apply to general management positions. These differences are partly explained by women’s preference for jobs with better anticipated work–life balance, their lower identification with stereotypically masculine jobs, and their lower expectations of job offer success in such stereotypically masculine jobs. We find no evidence that women are less likely to receive job offers in any of the fields studied. These results point to some of the ways in which gender differences can become entrenched through the long-term expectations and assumptions that job candidates carry with them into the application process.
Gender differences in the work commitment of Chinese workers: An investigation of two alternative explanations

Kelly Z. Peng,Hang-Yue Ngo,Junqi Shi,Chi-Sum Wong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2008.08.003

IF: 8.635

2009-01-01

Journal of World Business

Abstract:This study explores the differences in work commitment between Chinese male and female employees. We develop a model that specifies the major antecedents of job and organizational commitment in the Chinese workplace. We then examine whether the gender differences can be attributed to factors related to gender role ideology or unfavorable work conditions encountered by women. Several hypotheses are formulated and tested with a data set collected from 582 employees in Beijing. The findings reveal that employee work commitment is related to organizational support, job characteristics, and perceptions of gender discrimination. Further, it is found that the level of job commitment of women is lower than that of men, whereas the level of organizational commitment is the same for both sexes. The lower level of job commitment of women is due largely to their stronger perception of gender discrimination, receiving less challenging job assignments, and engaging in a low level of leader–member exchange. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.
Educational choice, initial wage and wage growth

Hans van Ophem,Jacopo Mazza

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-024-02580-5

IF: 3.2

2024-03-22

Empirical Economics

Abstract:We study the effects of expected initial wages, expected wage growth, and observed and unobserved heterogeneity in the choice of college major in a sample of American college graduates. We propose a three-stage empirical model that relates future earnings to individual choices. In the first stage, starting from revealed choices, observed wages, and life-cycle wage profiles, we estimate the expectation on initial wages and wage growth from the individual point of view, where the panel structure of the data allows us to produce estimates corrected for self-selection bias. We find substantial differences in expected real wages and expected real wage growth between majors and that both characteristics of life cycle earnings influence major choice. Our parametric models show a strong correlation between salary trends and major choice, whereas semiparametric models yield less reliable results. We interpret our results as being consistent with agents being rational and as a validation for our estimation strategy based on counterfactual imputation.

economics,social sciences, mathematical methods
A meta-analysis of gender stereotypes and bias in experimental simulations of employment decision making.

Amanda J. Koch,Susan D. D’Mello,Paul R. Sackett,Susan D. D'Mello

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036734

IF: 11.8025

2015-01-01

Journal of Applied Psychology

Abstract:Gender bias continues to be a concern in many work settings, leading researchers to identify factors that influence workplace decisions. In this study we examine several of these factors, using an organizing framework of sex distribution within jobs (including male- and female-dominated jobs as well as sex-balanced, or integrated, jobs). We conducted random effects meta-analyses including 136 independent effect sizes from experimental studies (N = 22,348) and examined the effects of decision-maker gender, amount and content of information available to the decision maker, type of evaluation, and motivation to make careful decisions on gender bias in organizational decisions. We also examined study characteristics such as type of participant, publication year, and study design. Our findings revealed that men were preferred for male-dominated jobs (i.e., gender-role congruity bias), whereas no strong preference for either gender was found for female-dominated or integrated jobs. Second, male raters exhibited greater gender-role congruity bias than did female raters for male-dominated jobs. Third, gender-role congruity bias did not consistently decrease when decision makers were provided with additional information about those they were rating, but gender-role congruity bias was reduced when information clearly indicated high competence of those being evaluated. Fourth, gender-role congruity bias did not differ between decisions that required comparisons among ratees and decisions made about individual ratees. Fifth, decision makers who were motivated to make careful decisions tended to exhibit less gender-role congruity bias for male-dominated jobs. Finally, for male-dominated jobs, experienced professionals showed smaller gender-role congruity bias than did undergraduates or working adults.

psychology, applied,management
Paying for Work-Family Balance: Assessing the Role of Family-Friendly Job Amenities in Occupational Segregation

Miriam Barcus

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23294965221094791

2022-05-23

Social Currents

Abstract:Social Currents, Ahead of Print. Workers in female-dominated occupations earn less, on average, than workers in comparable male-dominated occupations. To explain the gendered occupational wage disparity, com pensating differentials theory focuses on women's preferences and asserts that women cluster in occupations that pay less in exchange for family-friendly job amenities. On the other hand, the devaluation perspective argues these wage discrepancies are the result of the cultural devaluation of women's work that leads to both lower wages and a lower likelihood of having job amenities. Using data from the 2017–2018 American Time Use Survey Leave Module, I examine whether workers in female-dominated occupations are indeed more likely to have access to family-friendly job amenities. I focus on workers' access to three contemporary family-friendly job amenities: paid leave, remote work, and flexible scheduling. I find that workers in female-dominated jobs are no more likely to have access to family-friendly job amenities than workers in male-dominated jobs. Additionally, family-friendly job amenities are associated with higher wages, not the lower wages as compensating differentials posits. These findings suggest that compensating differentials theory cannot explain the clustering of women in lower-paying occupations.

English Else
Entering a gender-neutral workplace? College students' expectations and the impact of information provision

Francesca Barigozzi,José J. Domínguez,Natalia Montinari

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2024.102770

IF: 3

2024-09-29

Journal of Economic Psychology

Abstract:This paper explores whether college students are aware of gender disparities in academic performance and labor market outcomes, and examines the effect of providing information about these gaps. The study uses a lab experiment that includes (i) a questionnaire eliciting beliefs, (ii) a task assignment game where participants act as employers, and (iii) a game measuring willingness to compete. The experiment features two feedback treatments: one providing information only on gender gaps in labor market outcomes, and the other including information on both academic performance and labor market outcomes. In another treatment, the questionnaire was administered without providing new information to make gender salient. Results indicate that most participants are unaware of gender gaps. Feedback treatments did not significantly affect hiring decisions but, making gender salient, positively influenced women's assignment to the difficult task, particularly among those previously unaware of the gaps, possibly due to social desirability bias. Men with implicit stereotypes were more inclined to compete regardless of treatment, while women with implicit stereotypes competed more after receiving information on the gap in academic performance. Overall, the study suggests that highlighting gender issues and informing women who hold implicit stereotypes can have mild positive effects.

economics,psychology, multidisciplinary
Prevalence of Long Hours and Skilled Women's Occupational Choices

Patricia Cortes,Jessica Pan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2846316

2016-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:Gender differences in occupations account for a sizable portion of the persistent gender pay gap. This paper examines the relationship between the demand for long hours of work (as proxied for by the share of men working 50 or more hours per week) and skilled women's occupational choice. Exploiting variation across 215 occupations and four decades in the US, we find that the prevalence of overwork in an occupation significantly lowers the share of college educated young married women with children working in that occupation. These findings are robust to controlling for the occupational distribution of similarly aged males and married women with no children, suggesting that the prevalence of overwork reduces the desirability of the work environment for women with family responsibilities and is not merely proxying for other demand side shocks. Similar results are obtained using a panel of European countries.
Beyond Being Beneficiaries: Two Mechanisms Explain Why Women Have More Favourable Attitudes Towards Gender Quotas Than Men

Miriam K. Zehnter,Christa Nater

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.3113

2024-09-28

European Journal of Social Psychology

Abstract:This research identified two mechanisms that explain gender differences in attitudes towards gender quotas. Using a multi‐method approach, we assessed attitudes as self‐reported support for gender quotas and rater‐coded valence of participants' free associations with gender quotas. Study 1 examined quotas for university professorship positions (N = 237) and Study 2 quotas for corporate leadership positions (N = 587). Supporting the first mechanism, women's greater perceptions of discrimination against women related to greater perceived necessity of gender quotas, which related to more favourable attitudes. Supporting the second mechanism, men's greater concerns that quotas discriminate against men related to greater concerns that quotas stigmatize women as incompetent, which related to less favourable attitudes. By advancing the understanding of key mechanisms behind attitudes towards gender quotas, this research contributes to effectively designing and successfully implementing hard affirmative action policies aimed at overcoming women's underrepresentation in leading academic and corporate positions.

psychology, social
Taste for Competition and the Gender Gap Among Young Business Professionals

Ernesto Reuben,Paola Sapienza,Luigi Zingales

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2677298

2015-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:Using an incentivized measure of individuals’ taste for competition, this paper investigates whether this taste explains subsequent gender differences in earnings and industry choice in a sample of high-ability MBA graduates. We find that “competitive” individuals earn 9% more than their less competitive counterparts do. Moreover, gender differences in taste for competition explain around 10% of the overall gender gap. We also find that competitive individuals are more likely to work in high-paying industries nine years later, which suggests that the relation between taste for competition and earnings persists in the long run. Lastly, we find that the effect of taste for competition emerges over time when MBAs and firms interact with each other.
HLA-DR and Factor VIII Antibodies in Hemophilia A

W. Mayr,K. Lechner,H. Niessner,I. Pabinger-Fasching

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1661081

1984-04-30

Thrombosis and Haemostasis

Abstract:Dear Sir, The existence of immune-response genes within the major histocompatibility complex of man, the HLA-system, which are identical to or which show a high linkage disequilibrium with HLA-DR alleles is uncontested (1). The question as to whether HLA-linked genes influence the production of antibodies to factor VIII in patients with hemophilia A, however, remains unsolved, as family investigations gave no clear-cut results (2, 3). In order to analyse a possible relationship between the HLAsystem and the development of factor VIII antibodies, 65 unre lated patients (58 severe, 7 moderate or mild) with hemophilia A of the Vienna hemophilia center were typed for HLA-DR antigens. 12 patients had an antibody to factor VIII, all had severe hemophilia A. 7 were classified as good responders and 5 as poor responders (4). Controls were 160 healthy individuals living in Vienna. HLA-DR typing was performed with TCF-method according to van Rood et al. (5) with sera defining HLA-DR 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7. Statistics: X2-test with Yates correction for continuity. The frequencies of HLA-DR antigens in patients with and without antibodies to factor VIII are given in Table 1. The comparison of both groups does not reveal significant differences, thus indicating that there is no influence of HLA-DR or of a HLA gene in linkage disequilibrium with the HLA-DR alleles tested on the production of factor VIII antibodies in patients with hemophilia A. The inspection of the HLA-DR antigen frequencies in the patients (Table 1) showed a higher prevalence of HLA-DR 5 antigen in hemophiliacs (p = 0.02). The difference in the frequencies, however, is no more statistically significant if the pvalue is corrected by multiplying it with the number of compari sons made (6). Nevertheless, this high prevalence of HLA-DR 5 observed in the Viennese patients with hemophilia A should be checked in other population groups in order to see whether this phenomenon is only due to chance or whether a segregation distortion for the chromosome 6 carrying the HLA-DR 5 gene and the X chromosome with the hemophilia A gene may exist. W. R. Mayr1 K. Lechner H. Niessner I. Pabinger-Fasching Institute of Blood Group Serology1 (Head: Prof. Dr. P. Speiser) First Department of Medicine (Head: Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. E. Deutsch) Div. of Hematology and Blood Coagulation, University of Vienna Lazarettgasse 14, A-1090 Vienna Austria

Usefulness of contrast stress-echocardiography or exercise-electrocardiography to predict long-term acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting with chest pain without electrocardiographic abnormalities or 12-hour troponin elevation.

Occupational Segregation and Its Effect on Estimates of the Gender Wage Differential:Evidence from 2002 UHS Data

Salary, flexibility or career opportunity? A choice experiment on gender specific job preferences

Gender Differences in Wage Expectations

Women’s aversion to majors that (seemingly) require systemizing skills causes gendered field of study choice

Gender differences in wage expectations and negotiation

A Global Study of Pay Preferences and Employee Characteristics

GENDER DIFFERENCES IN THE VALUATION OF EMPLOYER-PROVIDED HEALTH INSURANCE

Gender differences and similarities in work preferences: Results from a factorial survey experiment

What men and women value at work: implications for workplace health

Heterogeneous Major Preferences for Extrinsic Incentives: The Effects of Wage Information on the Gender Gap in STEM Major Choice

Do Women Choose Different Jobs from Men? Mechanisms of Application Segregation in the Market for Managerial Workers

Gender differences in the work commitment of Chinese workers: An investigation of two alternative explanations

Educational choice, initial wage and wage growth

A meta-analysis of gender stereotypes and bias in experimental simulations of employment decision making.

Paying for Work-Family Balance: Assessing the Role of Family-Friendly Job Amenities in Occupational Segregation

Entering a gender-neutral workplace? College students' expectations and the impact of information provision

Prevalence of Long Hours and Skilled Women's Occupational Choices

Beyond Being Beneficiaries: Two Mechanisms Explain Why Women Have More Favourable Attitudes Towards Gender Quotas Than Men

Taste for Competition and the Gender Gap Among Young Business Professionals

HLA-DR and Factor VIII Antibodies in Hemophilia A