DNA methylation derived systemic inflammation indices are associated with head and neck cancer development and survival

Srikant Ambatipudi,Ryan Langdon,Rebecca C Richmond,Matthew Suderman,Devin C Koestler,Karl T Kelsey,Nabila Kazmi,Christopher Penfold,Karen M Ho,Wendy McArdle,Susan M Ring,Miranda Pring,Tim Waterboer,Michael Pawlita,Tom R Gaunt,George Davey Smith,Steve Thomas,Andy R Ness,Caroline L Relton
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.08.021
Abstract:Objectives: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is often associated with chronic systemic inflammation (SI). In the present study, we assessed if DNA methylation-derived SI (mdSI) indices: Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte ratio (mdNLR) and Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte ratio (mdLMR) are associated with the presence of HNSCC and overall survival (OS). Materials and methods: We used two peripheral blood DNA methylation datasets: an HNSCC case-control dataset (n = 183) and an HNSCC survival dataset (n = 407) to estimate mdSI indices. We then performed multivariate regressions to test the association between mdSI indices, HNSCC development and OS. Results: Multivariate logistic regression revealed that elevated mdNLR was associated with increased odds of being an HNSCC case (OR = 3.25, 95% CI = 2.14-5.34, P = 4 × 10-7) while the converse was observed for mdLMR (OR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.81-0.90, P = 2 × 10-3). In the HNSCC survival dataset, HPV16-E6 seropositive HNSCC cases had an elevated mdLMR (P = 9 × 10-5) and a lower mdNLR (P = 0.003) compared to seronegative patients. Multivariate Cox regression in the HNSCC survival dataset revealed that lower mdLMR (HR = 1.96, 95% CI = 1.30-2.95, P = 0.0013) but not lower mdNLR (HR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.46-1.00, P = 0.0501) was associated with increased risk of death. Conclusion: Our results indicate that mdSI estimated by DNA methylation data is associated with the presence of HNSCC and overall survival. The mdSI indices may be used as a valuable research tool to reliably estimate SI in the absence of cell-based estimates. Rigorous validation of our findings in large prospective studies is warranted in the future.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?