Abstract:Objective:To analyze the predictive value of P504S for pathological upgrading of gastric low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN) after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).Methods:Data of 117 patients (119 lesions) who underwent ESD for LGIN at Huadong Hospital from January 2015 to March 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. Biopsy and ESD specimens were collected. According to pathology, specimens were divided into the LGIN group (postoperative pathology of non-upgrade) and the upgrade group (postoperative pathology of upgrade). The positive rates of P504S were compared between biopsy and postoperative specimens of the LGIN group, and between biopsy and postoperative specimens of the upgrade group. The consistency of the expression of P504S was examined between the biopsy specimens and the postoperative specimens in the LGIN group and the upgrade group. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve of the prediction of pathological upgrading was drawn by the results of P504S in biopsy, and the cutoff value of immunohistochemical staining score was calculated.Results:The positive rate of P504S in the biopsy specimens of the LGIN group (46.8%, 36/77) was lower than that in the biopsy specimens of the upgrade group (73.2%, 30/41) with significant difference ( P=0.006). The positive rate of P504S in the postoperative specimens of the LGIN group (51.9%, 40/77) was lower than that in the postoperative specimens of the upgrade group (82.9%, 34/41) with significant difference ( P=0.001). In the LGIN group, the positive rate of P504S in biopsy specimens (46.8%, 36/77) was lower than that in postoperative specimens (51.9%, 40/77) without significant difference ( P=0.289). The expression of P504S was consistent between biopsy specimens and postoperative specimens with good consistency( K=0.793, P<0.001). In the upgrade group, the positive rate of P504S in biopsy specimens (73.2%, 30/41) was lower than that in the postoperative specimens (82.9%, 34/41) without significant difference ( P=0.219). The expression of P504S was consistent between biopsy and postoperative specimens, and the consistency was general ( K=0.579, P<0.001). ROC curve was drawn for the prediction of pathological upgrading by the results of P504S in biopsy, and the cutoff value of immunohistochemical staining score was 100. The sensitivity and specificity of pathological upgrading for positive result were 0.659 and 0.740, respectively. Conclusion:P504S staining of the postoperative specimens facilitates identification of the degree of gastric mucosal neoplasia. When the cutoff value of staining score is 100, the staining of P504S in biopsy tissue plays a role in predicting the pathological upgrading.

Risk factors associated with histological upgrade of gastric low-grade dysplasia on pretreatment biopsy

How Commonly is the Diagnosis of Gastric Low Grade Dysplasia Upgraded Following Endoscopic Resection? A Meta-Analysis.

Risk Factors of Pathological Upgrading in Gastric Mucosa Lesions with Low-Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Endoscopic resection of gastric low-grade dysplasia with high risk factors is associated with decreased advanced neoplasia: a single-center retrospective cohort study

Tumor heterogeneity and carcinoma in resected specimens of gastric low-grade dysplasia: A retrospective single center study

Risk factors of postoperative pathological upgrading in gastric high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia

Comparison of Pathological Results Between Preoperative and Postoperative Samples from Patients with Gastric Intraepithelial Neoplasia

Potential Factors Predicting Histopathologically Upgrade Discrepancies between Endoscopic Forceps Biopsy of the Colorectal Low-Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Endoscopic Resection Specimens

Prognostic Improvement of Reexcision for Positive Resection Margins in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer.

Risk factors for pathological upgrading and noncurative resection in patients with gastric mucosal lesions after endoscopic submucosal dissection

Development and Validation of a Pathological Upgrading Prediction Model for Low-grade Gastric Mucosal Dysplasia.

Risk Factors for Under-Diagnosis of Esophageal Intra-Epithelial Neoplasia with Endoscopic Forceps Biopsy in Comparison with Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Risk factors of pathological discrepancy between biopsy and excisional specimen from gastric low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and early gastric cancer

Analysis of endoscopic features for histologic discrepancies between biopsy and endoscopic submucosal dissection in gastric neoplasms: 10-year results

Risk factors for under-diagnosis of gastric intraepithelial neoplasia and early gastric carcinoma in endoscopic forceps biopsy in comparison with endoscopic submucosal dissection in Chinese patients

Predictive value of P504S for pathological upgrading of gastric low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia after endoscopic submucosal dissection

Comparative analysis of differences between preoperative endoscopic biopsy and postoperative pathological examination for diagnosis of gastric intraepithelial neoplasia

Diagnostic Ability of Magnifying Narrow-Band Imaging for the Extent of Early Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Risk stratification of patients with gastric lesions indefinite for dysplasia

The long-term outcome and risk factors of histologic discrepancy between forceps biopsies and endoscopic resections in early gastric cancer: An observational study

Risk of metachronous gastric neoplasm occurrence during intermediate-term follow-up period after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric dysplasia