[Paranasal sinuses mucoceles. Our experience in 72 patients].

Sergio Obeso,J. Llorente,Juan Pablo Rodrigo,R. Sánchez,G. Mancebo,C. Suárez

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otorri.2009.05.006

2009-09-01

Acta Otorrinolaringológica Española

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Trends in US E-cigarette Sales and Prices by Nicotine Strength, Overall and by Product and Flavor Type, 2017–2022

Fatma Romeh M Ali,Elizabeth L Seaman,Elisha Crane,Barbara Schillo,Brian A King

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntac284

2022-12-29

Nicotine & Tobacco Research

Abstract:Abstract Introduction The e-cigarette market has expanded considerably in recent years, resulting in changes in availability and use of e-cigarettes with varying characteristics. Aims and Methods This study assessed trends in sales and prices of e-cigarettes by nicotine strength level, including by product type and flavor, during January 2017–March 2022. US e-cigarette retail sales data were licensed from IRI company. Nicotine strength was categorized as: <1%; 1% to <2%; 2% to <3%; 3% to <4%; 4% to <5%; ≥5%. E-cigarette flavors were categorized as tobacco, menthol, mint, or other flavors. Product type was categorized as prefilled cartridge devices, disposable devices, or e-liquid bottles. Trend analyses were performed using Joinpoint Regression. Results During January 2017–March 2022, the unit share of products containing ≥5% nicotine strength increased by 1486.3%, while the dollar share increased by 1345.5%. By March 2022, 80.9% of total unit sales were composed of products containing ≥5% nicotine strength. By flavor, the percentage of units sold with ≥5% nicotine strength was 61.3% of tobacco-flavor sales, 79.3% of menthol sales, 87.4% of mint sales, and 96.1% of other flavor sales. By product type, the percentage of units sold with ≥5% nicotine strength was 90.6% of disposable e-cigarette sales and 74.2% of prefilled cartridge sales. During January 2017–March 2022, the price of low-nicotine strength e-cigarettes increased, while the price of high-nicotine products either decreased or did not change. Conclusions Sales of high nicotine-strength e-cigarettes have dominated the US e-cigarette market. Limiting the nicotine strength of e-cigarettes could be considered as part of a comprehensive tobacco control strategy to reduce youth access to and use of these products. Implications The findings from this study indicate that previously reported increases in e-cigarette nicotine strength during 2013–2018 have continued through 2022. The US e-cigarette market sales continue to be dominated by relatively high-nicotine products. Strategies to address factors that make these products, particularly appealing to youth, including flavors and product innovations, are critical. Such strategies are important—as part of a comprehensive approach alongside other evidence-based population-level actions—to address youth e-cigarette use. Importantly, actions to reduce e-cigarette use among youth are not mutually exclusive from actions to maximize the potential benefits of e-cigarettes for increasing smoking cessation among adults.

public, environmental & occupational health,substance abuse
Evaluation of Statewide Restrictions on Flavored e-Cigarette Sales in the US From 2014 to 2020

Fatma Romeh M. Ali,Donna Vallone,Elizabeth L. Seaman,Jamie Cordova,Megan C. Diaz,Michael A. Tynan,Katrina F. Trivers,Brian A. King

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.47813

2022-02-10

JAMA Network Open

Abstract:Importance: e-Cigarettes are the most commonly used tobacco product among US youths. Flavors are among the most cited reasons for use of e-cigarettes among youths, and therefore, some states have imposed restrictions on flavored e-cigarette sales. To our knowledge, no study has compared e-cigarette sales between states with statewide flavored e-cigarette restrictions and states without such restrictions while controlling for co-occurring events.Objective: To assess whether implementation of statewide restrictions on flavored e-cigarette sales in Massachusetts, New York, Rhode Island, and Washington was associated with a reduction in total e-cigarette unit sales from 2014 to 2020.Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study with difference-in-differences analysis used e-cigarette retail sales data from Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Washington, which implemented restrictions on flavored e-cigarette sales in October 2019; New York, which implemented these restrictions in May 2020; and 35 states without these restrictions (control states). Sales were summed into 4-week periods from August 24, 2014, to December 27, 2020, for a total of 2988 state-period observations.Main Outcomes and Measures: A difference-in-differences analysis was conducted to compare e-cigarette unit sales in the 4 states with flavor restrictions (before and after implementation) with those in the 35 control states. The model controlled for other population-based policies and emergent events (eg, the COVID-19 pandemic). Data on 4-week e-cigarette unit sales were sorted into 4 flavor categories (tobacco, menthol, mint, and other). Unit sales were standardized to reflect the most common package sizes for each product type.Results: Statewide restrictions on non-tobacco-flavored e-cigarette sales were associated with the following reductions in mean 4-week total e-cigarette sales in intervention states compared with control states from October 2019 to December 2020: 30.65% (95% CI, 24.08%-36.66%) in New York, 31.26% (95% CI, 11.94%-46.34%) in Rhode Island, and 25.01% (95% CI, 18.43%-31.05%) in Washington. In Massachusetts, the comprehensive sales prohibition of all e-cigarette products was associated with a 94.38% (95% CI, 93.37%-95.23%) reduction in 4-week sales compared with control states. Except in Massachusetts, where all sales of flavored e-cigarettes decreased, reductions were found only for non-tobacco-flavored e-cigarette sales in the other states with restrictions. Among control states, mean sales decreased by 28.4% from August 2019 to February 2020 but then increased by 49.9% from February through December 2020.Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, statewide restrictions on the sale of flavored e-cigarettes in Massachusetts, New York, Rhode Island, and Washington were associated with a reduction in total e-cigarette sales. These findings suggest that not all e-cigarette users who purchased non-tobacco-flavored e-cigarettes switched to purchasing tobacco-flavored e-cigarettes after policy implementation.

medicine, general & internal
E-cigarette Unit Sales by Product and Flavor Type, and Top-Selling Brands, United States, 2020–2022

Elisha Crane,Elizabeth Seaman,Kristy Marynak,Fatma Romeh M. Ali,Andrew B. Seidenberg,Michael A. Tynan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7225a1

2023-06-23

Abstract:This report describes an increase in e-cigarette unit sales during January 2020– December 2022.

public, environmental & occupational health
[Ergotherapy in palliative care].

M. Chaudéron,A. Vabre

Soins Gérontologie

Abstract:
A priori information and optimisation in polarimetry.

M. Foreman,Carlos Macias Romero,P. Török

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.16.015212

IF: 3.8

2008-09-15

Optics Express

Abstract:Polarimetric measurements are designed to obtain information pertaining to the system under study, however noise in the system limits the precision and hence information obtainable. Exploitation of a priori knowledge of the system allows for an improvement in the precision of experimental data. In this vein we present a framework for system design and optimisation based upon the Fisher information matrix, which allows easy incorporation of such a priori information. As such the proposed figure of merit is more complete than the commonly used condition number. Conditions of equivalence are considered, however a number of examples highlight the failings of the condition number under more general scenarios. Bounds on the achievable informational gains via multiple polarimeter arms are also given. Finally we present analytic results concerning error distribution in a Mueller matrix polar decomposition, allowing for a more accurate noise analysis in polarimetric experiments.
Flavored Tobacco Product Use Among Middle and High School Students--United States, 2014

Catherine G Corey,Bridget K Ambrose,Benjamin J Apelberg,Brian A King

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6438a2

2015-10-02

Abstract:The 2009 Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act prohibits "characterizing flavors" (e.g., candy, fruit, and chocolate) other than tobacco and menthol in cigarettes; however, characterizing flavors are not currently prohibited in other tobacco products. Analyses of retail sales data suggest that U.S. consumption of flavored noncigarette tobacco products, including flavored cigars and flavored e-cigarettes, has increased in recent years. There is growing concern that widely marketed varieties of new and existing flavored tobacco products might appeal to youths (2) and could be contributing to recent increases in the use of tobacco products, including e-cigarettes and hookah, among youths. CDC and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) analyzed data from the 2014 National Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS) to determine the prevalence of past 30 day use (current use) of flavored e-cigarette, hookah tobacco, cigar, pipe tobacco or smokeless tobacco products, and menthol cigarettes among middle and high school students, and the proportion of current tobacco product users who have used flavored products. An estimated 70.0% (3.26 million) of all current youth tobacco users had used at least one flavored tobacco product in the past 30 days. Among current users, 63.3%, (1.58 million) had used a flavored e-cigarette, 60.6%, (1.02 million) had used flavored hookah tobacco, and 63.5% (910,000) had used a flavored cigar in the past 30 days. Given the millions of current youth tobacco users, it is important for comprehensive tobacco prevention and control strategies to address all forms of tobacco use, including flavored tobacco products, among U.S. youths.
Characteristics of e-Cigarette Use Behaviors Among US Youth, 2020

Teresa W. Wang,Andrea S. Gentzke,Linda J. Neff,Emily V. Glidden,Ahmed Jamal,Eunice Park-Lee,Chunfeng Ren,Karen A. Cullen,Brian A. King,Karen A. Hacker

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.11336

2021-06-07

JAMA Network Open

Abstract:Importance: Comprehensive surveillance of e-cigarette use behaviors among youth is important for informing strategies to address this public health epidemic.Objective: To characterize e-cigarette use behaviors among US youth in 2020.Design, Setting, and Participants: The 2020 National Youth Tobacco Survey, a nationally representative, cross-sectional, school-based survey of middle school (grades 6-8) and high school (grades 9-12) students, was conducted from January 16, 2020, to March 16, 2020. A total of 14 531 students from 180 schools participated in the 2020 survey, yielding a corresponding student-level participation rate of 87.4% and school-level participation rate of 49.9%. The overall response rate, a product of the school-level and student-level participation rates, was 43.6%.Exposures: Current (past 30-day) e-cigarette use.Main Outcomes and Measures: Self-reported current e-cigarette use behaviors (frequency of use, usual e-cigarette brand, and access source) by school level and flavored e-cigarette use and flavor types among current e-cigarette users by school level and device type. Prevalence estimates were weighted to account for the complex survey design.Results: Overall, 14 531 students completed the survey, including 7330 female students and 7133 male students with self-reported grade level and sex. In 2020, 19.6% (95% CI, 17.2%-22.2%) of high school students and 4.7% (95% CI, 3.6%-6.0%) of middle school students reported current e-cigarette use. Among them, 38.9% (95% CI, 35.2%-42.6%) of high school users and 20.0% (95% CI, 16.0%-24.8%) of middle school users reported e-cigarette use on 20 to 30 days within the past 30 days. Among current users, JUUL was the most commonly reported usual brand (high school: 25.4%; 95% CI, 18.8%-33.4%; middle school: 35.1%; 95% CI, 27.9%-43.1%). Among current users, the most common source of obtaining e-cigarettes was from a friend (high school: 57.1%; 95% CI, 52.6%-61.4%; middle school: 58.9%; 95% CI, 51.4%-66.1%). Among current users, 84.7% (95% CI, 82.2%-86.9%) of high school students and 73.9% (95% CI, 66.9%-79.8%) of middle school students reported flavored e-cigarette use. Fruit-flavored e-cigarettes were the most commonly reported flavor among current exclusive e-cigarette users of prefilled pods or cartridges (67.3%; 95% CI, 60.9%-73.0%), disposable e-cigarettes (85.8%; 95% CI, 79.8%-90.3%), and tank-based devices (82.7%; 95% CI, 68.9%-91.1%), followed by mint-flavored e-cigarettes.Conclusions and Relevance: These results suggest that although current e-cigarette use decreased during 2019 to 2020, overall prevalence, frequent use, and flavored e-cigarette use remained high. Continued actions are warranted to prevent and reduce e-cigarette use among US youth.

medicine, general & internal
Use of Flavored E-Cigarettes and the Type of E-Cigarette Devices Used among Adults and Youth in the US—Results from Wave 3 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study (2015–2016)

Liane M. Schneller,Maansi Bansal-Travers,Maciej L. Goniewicz,Scott McIntosh,Deborah Ossip,Richard J. O’Connor

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16162991

IF: 4.614

2019-08-20

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract:The United States (U.S.) Food and Drug Administration has expressed concern about flavored e-cigarettes (e.g., JUUL brand) because they are appealing to youth who may be unaware that the product is addictive. The Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study Wave 3 provided data on flavor categories, type of e-cigarette product, and smoking status among past 30-day youth and adult e-cigarette users in the US. Most past 30-day youth and adult users reported using only one flavor category, with fruit (53% youth, 31% adult) being the most commonly reported category. Adults were far more likely to report using tobacco flavor alone, compared to any other individual flavor category or flavor category combinations (OR: 21.08, 95%CI: 5.92, 75.12). Whereas, youth were more likely to report using multiple flavor categories (OR: 2.03, 95%CI: 1.55, 2.65), with the most reported pairing being fruit and candy (36%). The variety of flavors on the market appeals to consumers of all ages. Although most past 30-day e-cigarette users reported only one flavor category, non-tobacco flavors were far more common among youth. Differences in flavor preferences among adult versus youth vapers may have implications for the role of flavors in both the initiation of youth vaping and adult vaping for smoking cessation.

public, environmental & occupational health,environmental sciences
Radiation amplification near an autoionizing state: A model in atomic Ca.

Zhang,Lambropoulos,Tang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PHYSREVA.50.1935

1994-08-01

Abstract:
E-cigarette and tobacco product use among NYS youth before and after a state-wide vaping flavour restriction policy, 2020–2021

Liane M Schneller,Karin A Kasza,David Hammond,Maansi Bansal-Travers,Richard O'Connor,Andrew Hyland

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2022-057450

IF: 6.953

2022-11-01

Tobacco Control

Abstract:Significance Reducing youth e-cigarette use is a New York State (NYS) public health priority. In May 2020, a state-wide restriction on flavoured e-cigarettes, except tobacco flavour, was passed. This study examines changes in nicotine product use behaviour among youth around the time of the state-wide vaping flavour restriction. Methods NYS data from the US International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project Youth Tobacco and E-cigarette Tobacco and Vaping Survey were analysed cross-sectionally from February 2020 (n=955), August 2020 (n=946), February 2021 (n=1030) and August 2021 (n=753). Online surveys were conducted among youth 16–19 years. Weighted descriptive statistics and regression models were used to describe changes in nicotine product use behaviour. Models were adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity and perceived family socioeconomic status. Results Significant decreases in past 30-day e-cigarette use (20%–11%), cigarette (7%-4%), and dual use of e-cigarettes and cigarettes (5%–2%) were observed over the 2-year period in NYS. Over 95% of vapers still reported using a non-tobacco-flavoured e-cigarette following the restriction, with fruit-flavoured being the most popular at each time point. Conclusions Nearly all NYS youth continued to vape flavours that were restricted in NYS. While youth past 30-day vaping prevalence decreased significantly from 2020 to 2021, increased flavour restriction compliance could result in an even greater decrease. Continuous monitoring is important to better understand perceptions, use patterns and access at the individual level, retail level and population level to inform future enforcement and restrictions.

public, environmental & occupational health,substance abuse
User Perceptions of Different Electronic Cigarette Flavors on Social Media: Observational Study

Xinyi Lu,Long Chen,Jianbo Yuan,Joyce Luo,Jiebo Luo,Zidian Xie,Dongmei Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/17280

IF: 7.076

2020-06-24

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract:Background The number of electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) users has been increasing rapidly in recent years, especially among youth and young adults. More e-cigarette products have become available, including e-liquids with various brands and flavors. Various e-liquid flavors have been frequently discussed by e-cigarette users on social media. Objective This study aimed to examine the longitudinal prevalence of mentions of electronic cigarette liquid (e-liquid) flavors and user perceptions on social media. Methods We applied a data-driven approach to analyze the trends and macro-level user sentiments of different e-cigarette flavors on social media. With data collected from web-based stores, e-liquid flavors were classified into categories in a flavor hierarchy based on their ingredients. The e-cigarette–related posts were collected from social media platforms, including Reddit and Twitter, using e-cigarette–related keywords. The temporal trend of mentions of e-liquid flavor categories was compiled using Reddit data from January 2013 to April 2019. Twitter data were analyzed using a sentiment analysis from May to August 2019 to explore the opinions of e-cigarette users toward each flavor category. Results More than 1000 e-liquid flavors were classified into 7 major flavor categories. The fruit and sweets categories were the 2 most frequently discussed e-liquid flavors on Reddit, contributing to approximately 58% and 15%, respectively, of all flavor-related posts. We showed that mentions of the fruit flavor category had a steady overall upward trend compared with other flavor categories that did not show much change over time. Results from the sentiment analysis demonstrated that most e-liquid flavor categories had significant positive sentiments, except for the beverage and tobacco categories. Conclusions The most updated information about the popular e-liquid flavors mentioned on social media was investigated, which showed that the prevalence of mentions of e-liquid flavors and user perceptions on social media were different. Fruit was the most frequently discussed flavor category on social media. Our study provides valuable information for future regulation of flavored e-cigarettes.

health care sciences & services,medical informatics
Non-tobacco nicotine E-cigarette use and flavored E-cigarette use among young adults in the United States

Wei Li,Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin,Meghan E Morean,Krysten W Bold,Danielle R Davis,Deepa R Camenga,Grace Kong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.108001

Abstract:Background: E-cigarette flavors can create sensations of sweetness and coolness while masking the aversiveness of nicotine. Recently, non-tobacco nicotine (NTN) products were introduced to the market, but little is known about flavors in NTN e-cigarette use. We examined associations between flavors (i.e., sweet, mint/menthol) and susceptibility to and use of NTN e-cigarettes. Methods: 1239 US young adults (18-25 years) completed an anonymous, online survey in Fall 2021. The analytic sample included 520 participants who had used e-cigarettes and heard of NTN. Multinomial logistic regression models analyzed associations of flavored e-cigarette use (sweet and mint/menthol) with NTN e-cigarette use status (i.e., current [past-month] use, past [ever but not current] use, susceptible to use, and non-susceptible to use [reference]). Results: Overall, 46.2% of participants reported current NTN use, 14.8% reported past use, 16.7% were susceptible to use, and 22.3% reported no susceptibility. Participants reported dual-use of sweet and mint/menthol NTN e-cigarette flavors (56.5%), sweet flavors use (24.8%), and mint/menthol flavor use (1.7%). Ever dual use of sweet and mint/menthol flavors was associated with current (OR = 9.64, 95%CI: 3.21-28.98) and past NTN e-cigarette use (8.30, [2.10-32.80]). Ever sweet flavor use was associated with current NTN use (3.80, 95%CI: 1.44-10.03) and susceptibility to future use (4.25, [1.53-11.81]). Similar findings were observed for mint/menthol flavors (current: 5.03, [1.41-17.99]; susceptible: 5.65, [1.64-19.51]). Conclusion: The use of sweet and mint/menthol flavors was significantly associated with NTN e-cigarette use among US young adults, highlighting the need for ongoing surveillance of flavored NTN e-cigarettes and appropriate regulations to discourage use.
[Withdrawal syndrome from SSRI antidepressive agents].

J. Gerlach

1998-02-02

Abstract:
Menthol cigarette use among adults who smoke cigarettes, 2008 to 2020: Rapid growth and widening inequities in the United States.

K. Wyka,Ollie Ganz,Philip H. Smith,C. Delnevo,A. Weinberger,R. Goodwin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntac214

2022-10-13

Nicotine & Tobacco Research

Abstract:INTRODUCTION In April 2021, the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration announced its intention to issue a product standard banning menthol as a characterizing flavor in cigarettes. Given the potential relevance of national estimates of menthol use to pending legislation, this study estimated the prevalence of menthol use among US adults who smoke cigarettes in 2020 and investigated changes in menthol use from 2008-2019 by sociodemographics, mental health, and substance use. METHODS Nationally representative annual, cross-sectional data from individuals ages 18 and older residing in the US from the 2008-2019 and 2020 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) were analyzed using logistic and linear regression models to estimate trends in menthol use among adults who smoke cigarettes by sociodemographic, mental health and substance use variables (total analytic sample 2008-2019 n=128,327). RESULTS In 2020, 43.4% of adults who smoked cigarettes in the past-month used menthol. Menthol use was most common among Black adults (80%) and over 50% of those Hispanic, female, young (ages 18-34), lesbian/gay, with serious psychological distress, and with cigar use used menthol. Menthol use increased among adults who used cigarettes from 2008 to 2019, overall, and grew more rapidly among adults ages 26-34, Hispanic, light cigarette use (1-5 per day) and those who smoked cigars. CONCLUSIONS Menthol use has increased among US adults who smoke cigarettes over the past decade. Enacting menthol bans could have a widespread public health impact, especially among younger and minoritized groups. IMPLICATIONS Menthol cigarette use increased among individuals who smoke cigarettes across from 2008 to 2019 in the US. In 2020, over 40% of smokers used menthol, and menthol use was considerably higher among adult smokers from racial/ethnic minoritized groups, who were younger and who reported mental health problems. The US Food and Drug Administration seeks to ban menthol as a characterizing flavor in cigarettes; our results suggest that such ban is likely to have a wide-ranging impact on public health.

Medicine
[Radioprotective effects of carrageenan on blood-forming and lymphoid tissues].

K. S. Certkov,M. N. Trusina,S. P. Chramcenkova,G. I. Saposnikov,A. I. Usov,V. Rogozkin

Abstract:
Consumer Preferences for E-cigarette Flavor, Nicotine Strength, and Type: Evidence from Nielsen Scanner Data

Samane Zare,Yuqing Zheng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaa238

2021-05-04

Abstract:Introduction: Many countries regulate e-cigarette attributes such as flavors and nicotine strength. Despite a large literature on consumer preferences for e-cigarette attributes, none used consumer-level longitudinal purchase data. We therefore use a unique large dataset on U.S. adults' e-cigarette purchases as to gain insight into real-world consumer choices and purchasing patterns. Methods: A total of 7098 purchase transactions, made by 1239 households on e-cigarette from various retail outlets for 2013 through 2017, were collected from Nielsen scanner data. We then apply an innovative multinomial logit model to examine which factors affected adult choices over 23 e-cigarettes products broken down by eight brands, three flavors, three nicotine strength levels, and two types. Results: We found that tobacco flavor, medium nicotine strength (12< mg/ml ≤18), or disposables lead to higher adult purchases and such preference can vary over cigarette smoking status, purchase frequency, gender, race, and age. Specifically, smokers tend to purchase tobacco flavor, non-smokers or female vapers tend to purchase medium strength, and infrequent vapers tend to purchase disposables. Vapers are quite responsive to e-cigarette prices and also display loyalty (inertia) to e-cigarette brands, flavor, and nicotine strength. Conclusions: When modeled together, e-cigarette flavors, strength, type, price, and previous choice were all found to influence vapers' current purchase decision in the actual retail environment. Implications: The evidence presented here indicates that the impacts of certain restrictions on e-cigarette attributes, such as a flavor ban or maximum level of nicotine content, might have heterogeneous impacts on adults.
Presence of flavoured electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) products in US ENDS advertisements, 2015-2020: a content analysis

M B Moran,Lauren Czaplicki,Lidya Tadesse,Jessica Handy,Kevin Welding,Dannielle Kelley,Ryan David Kennedy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070212

IF: 3.006

2023-06-29

BMJ Open

Abstract:Objectives: Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) products come in a variety of flavours (eg, fruit, dessert, menthol). Tobacco advertising has historically used flavours as an advertising tactic, but little is known about flavour type and prevalence in ENDS advertisements. We assess the presence of flavoured ENDS in ads over time, by media outlet (eg, magazines, online) and brand. Methods: We acquired ENDS ads (N=4546) that first ran between 2015-2017 (n=1685; study 1) and 2018-2020 (n=2861; study 2) in outlets including opt-in emails, direct-to-consumer mail (study 1 only), video (TV and online), radio (study 2 only), static online/mobile (ie, ads without video or moving graphics), social media, outdoor (eg, billboards; study 2 only) and consumer magazines. We coded for presence of flavoured ENDS products and flavour type (eg, fruit, tobacco, menthol) and merged this information with metadata on ad year, outlet and manufacturer/retailer brand. Results: Overall, nearly half (45.5%; n=2067) of ads in our sample featured a flavoured product. Tobacco (59.1%; n=1221), menthol (42.9%; n=887) and fruit (38.6%; n=797) were the most advertised flavours. Over time, the proportion of ads containing tobacco-flavoured and menthol-flavoured ENDS generally decreased before menthol rebounded in 2020. The proportion of ads containing fruit, mint and dessert flavours generally increased over time, with a substantive drop in 2020. We found notable differences in flavoured ENDS advertising by outlet and brand. Conclusions: The overall presence of flavoured ENDS in our sample of ads remained relatively consistent, with tobacco flavour decreasing over time and some non-tobacco flavours increasing over time until 2020 when the presence decreased.
Reasons for current E-cigarette use among U.S. adults

Deesha Patel,Kevin C Davis,Shanna Cox,Brian Bradfield,Brian A King,Paul Shafer,Ralph Caraballo,Rebecca Bunnell

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.09.011

Abstract:E-cigarette use has increased rapidly among U.S. adults. However, reasons for use among adults are unclear. We assessed reasons for e-cigarette use among a national sample of U.S. adults. Data were collected via online surveys among U.S. adults aged 18 or older from April through June 2014. Descriptive and multivariate regression analyses were conducted to assess reasons for e-cigarette use among 2448 current e-cigarette users, by sociodemographic characteristics and product type. Assessed reasons included cessation/health, consideration of others, convenience, cost, curiosity, flavoring, and simulation of conventional cigarettes. Among current e-cigarette users, 93% were also current cigarette smokers. The most common reasons for e-cigarette use were cessation/health (84.5%), consideration of others (71.5%), and convenience (56.7%). The prevalence of citing convenience (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR]=1.49) and curiosity (aPR=1.54) as reasons for e-cigarette use were greater among current cigarette smokers than nonsmokers (P<0.05). The prevalence of citing flavoring as a reason for use was greater among adults aged 18 to 24 (aPR=2.02) than 55 or older (P<0.05). Tank use was associated with greater prevalence of citing every assessed reason except convenience and curiosity. Cessation- and health-related factors are primary reasons cited for e-cigarette use among adults, and flavorings are more commonly cited by younger adults. Efforts are warranted to provide consumers with accurate information on the health effects of e-cigarettes and to ensure that flavoring and other unregulated features do not promote nicotine addiction, particularly among young adults.
Changes in Electronic Cigarette Use among Adults in the United States, 2014-2016.

Wei Bao,Guifeng Xu,Jiachun Lu,Linda G. Snetselaar,Robert B. Wallace

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.4658

IF: 11.816

2018-01-01

JAMA

Abstract:Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are widely marketed as a tool for smoking cessation and a safer alternative to conventional cigarettes.However, the efficacy of e-cigarettes for successful smoking cessation is inconclusive. 1,2Previous studies have reported a rapid increase in the prevalence of e-cigarette use among US adults since 2010. [3]4][5] We analyzed new national survey data to estimate the changes in e-cigarette use among US adults in 2014-2016.
Flavor & device choices among people who use ENDS: Results from the PATH Study

Maansi Bansal-Travers,Cheryl Rivard,Cristine D. Delnevo,Amy Gross,Andrew Anesetti-Rothermel,Brittany Merson,Haijun Xiao,Yu-Ching Cheng,MeLisa R. Creamer,Heather L. Kimmel,Cassandra A. Stanton,Eva Sharma,Kristie Taylor,Kristin Lauten,Maciej Goniewicz,Andrew Hyland

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2024.09.020

IF: 6.604

2024-10-03

American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Abstract:Introduction In guidance published in February 2020, the FDA described their intent to prioritize enforcement against the sale of flavored cartridge-based electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) except tobacco and menthol flavors. This guidance was specific to cartridge-based ENDS and did not apply to other ENDS types or e-liquids sold in the United States (U.S.). It remains unknown if use of certain types of ENDS devices and flavors changed following the publication of this guidance. Methods This analysis includes PATH Study data from Wave 5 (W5, 2018-2019) and Wave 6 (W6, 2021) and examines cross-sectional estimates of 1) use of flavored ENDS and 2) use of different device types. All analyses in this study were stratified by self-reported age (youth – aged 12-17 years at W5 and aged 14-17 years at W6, and adults – aged 18-20, 21-24, and 25+). Analyses were conducted in 2023-2024. Results Among adults aged 21 years and over, there were significant increases in the use of menthol or mint flavored ENDS. There were no substantial changes in flavors of ENDS used among youth or adults aged 18-20 years. Among all age groups, the use of cartridge-based ENDS was lower in 2021 than 2018–2019, with a notable shift to disposable-style ENDS. Conclusions Federal-level tobacco control actions taken in the U.S. in early 2020 prioritized enforcement against "any flavored, cartridge-based ENDS product (other than a tobacco- or menthol-flavored ENDS product)". Based on this analysis, there was a shift following the policy to menthol or mint-flavored ENDS and disposable-style ENDS.

medicine, general & internal,public, environmental & occupational health

[Paranasal sinuses mucoceles. Our experience in 72 patients].

Trends in US E-cigarette Sales and Prices by Nicotine Strength, Overall and by Product and Flavor Type, 2017–2022

Evaluation of Statewide Restrictions on Flavored e-Cigarette Sales in the US From 2014 to 2020

E-cigarette Unit Sales by Product and Flavor Type, and Top-Selling Brands, United States, 2020–2022

[Ergotherapy in palliative care].

A priori information and optimisation in polarimetry.

Flavored Tobacco Product Use Among Middle and High School Students--United States, 2014

Characteristics of e-Cigarette Use Behaviors Among US Youth, 2020

Use of Flavored E-Cigarettes and the Type of E-Cigarette Devices Used among Adults and Youth in the US—Results from Wave 3 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study (2015–2016)

Radiation amplification near an autoionizing state: A model in atomic Ca.

E-cigarette and tobacco product use among NYS youth before and after a state-wide vaping flavour restriction policy, 2020–2021

User Perceptions of Different Electronic Cigarette Flavors on Social Media: Observational Study

Non-tobacco nicotine E-cigarette use and flavored E-cigarette use among young adults in the United States

[Withdrawal syndrome from SSRI antidepressive agents].

Menthol cigarette use among adults who smoke cigarettes, 2008 to 2020: Rapid growth and widening inequities in the United States.

[Radioprotective effects of carrageenan on blood-forming and lymphoid tissues].

Consumer Preferences for E-cigarette Flavor, Nicotine Strength, and Type: Evidence from Nielsen Scanner Data

Presence of flavoured electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) products in US ENDS advertisements, 2015-2020: a content analysis

Reasons for current E-cigarette use among U.S. adults

Changes in Electronic Cigarette Use among Adults in the United States, 2014-2016.

Flavor & device choices among people who use ENDS: Results from the PATH Study