An analysis of the frequency of Y-chromosome microdeletions and the determination of a threshold sperm concentration for genetic testing in infertile men

Mark Johnson,Amr Raheem,Francesco De Luca,Marcus Hallerstrom,Yasmeen Zainal,Sameer Poselay,Baharak Mohammadi,Amr Moubasher,Thomas Frederick Johnson,Asif Muneer,Philippa Sangster,David J Ralph
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14521
Abstract:Objective: To describe the prevalence of Y-chromosome microdeletions in a multi-ethnic urban population in London, UK. To also determine predictive factors and a clinical threshold for genetic testing in men with Y chromosome microdeletions. Patients and methods: A retrospective cohort study of 1473 men that were referred to a tertiary Andrology centre with male factor infertility between July 2004 and December 2016. All had a genetic evaluation, hormonal profile and 2 abnormal semen analyses. Those with abnormal examination findings also had targeted imaging performed. Results: The prevalence of microdeletions was 4% (n = 58) in this study. These microdeletions were partitioned into the following regions: Azoospermia factors (AZF); AZFc (75%), AZFb+c (13.8%), AZFb (6.9%), AZFa (1.7%), and partial AZFa (1.7%). A high follicle-stimulating hormone level (P < 0.001) and a low sperm concentration (P < 0.05) were both found to be significant predictors for the identification of a microdeletion. Testosterone level, luteinising hormone level and testicular volume did not predict the presence of a microdeletion. None of the men with an AZF microdeletion had a sperm concentration of >0.5 million/mL. Lowering the sperm concentration threshold to this level retained the high sensitivity (100%) and increased the specificity (31%). This would produce significant cost savings when compared to the European Academy of Andrology/European Molecular Genetics Quality Network and European Association of Urology guidelines. The surgical sperm retrieval (SSR) rate after microdissection testicular sperm extraction was 33.2% in men with AZFc microdeletion. Conclusions: The prevalence of Y-chromosome microdeletions in infertile men appears to vary between populations and countries. A low sperm concentration was a predictive factor (P < 0.05) for identifying microdeletions in infertile males. A threshold for genetic testing of 0.5 million/mL would increase the specificity and lower the relative cost without adversely affecting the sensitivity. The rate of SSR was lower than that previously described in the literature.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?