The Correlation Between Glycation Gap and Renal Complications in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Tuan Le,Khanh Thanh,Tien Tran,Dao Nguyen,Le Nguyen,Diep Pham,Lan Dam,Minh Hoang,Thuan Huynh
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/dmso.s439800
2024-01-24
Diabetes Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity Targets and Therapy
Abstract:Tuan Quoc Le, 1 Khanh Minh Thanh, 1 Tien Van Tran, 2 Dao Thi Bich Nguyen, 3 Le Thi Nguyen, 4 Diep Thao Pham, 5 Lan Thi Phuong Dam, 6 Minh Thị Hoang, 6 Thuan Quang Huynh 6 1 Department of Physiology-Pathophysiology-Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; 2 Department of Nephrology, Ho Chi Minh City Hospital for Rehabilitation - Professional Diseases, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; 3 Tam Duc Heart Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; 4 Nephrology Department, University Medical Center, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; 5 Biochemistry Department, Viet Duc Hospital, Ha Noi, Vietnam; 6 Biochemistry Department, 103 Military Medical Hospital, Vietnam Military Medical University (VMMU), Ha Noi City, Vietnam Correspondence: Thuan Quang Huynh, Biochemistry Department, 103 Military Medical Hospital, Vietnam Military Medical University (VMMU), No. 160, Phung Hung Street, Phuc La Ward, Ha Dong District, Hanoi City, Vietnam, Tel +84904175342, Email Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the correlations between the glycation gap (GG) and renal complications such as urinary albumin–creatinine ratio (UACR) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 104 individuals (52 males and 52 females), aged 36– 93 years old. Fasting blood glucose (FBG), HbA1c, and serum fructosamine were measured simultaneously. GG was calculated as the difference between the measured and fructosamine-based predicted HbA1c levels (FHbA1c). Results: There was a moderately positive correlation between HbA1c and fructosamine concentration (r = 0.488; p < 0.001). GG was positively correlated with UACR (r = 0.3275; p = 0.0007), negatively correlated with eGFR (r = − 0.3400; p = 0.0004). HbA1c was positively correlated with UACR (r = 0.2437; p = 0.0127) but not correlated with eGFR (r = − 0.444; p = 0.6542). Fructosamine has a positive correlation with eGFR (r = 0.2426; p = 0.0131) but not with UACR (r = − 0.1021; p = 0.3025). Conclusion: GG was positively correlated with UACR and inversely correlated with eGFR in type 2 Diabetes mellitus patients. This suggests that GG is a valuable index for predicting kidney complications due to diabetes. Keywords: type 2 diabetes, HbA1c, fructosamine, glycated gap, glomerular filtration rate, urinary albumin-creatinine ratio Globally, the prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) has been rising disproportionately in low- and middle-income countries. As reported by the International Diabetes Federation in 2021, the prevalence estimates of diabetes among people aged 20–79 years old was 10.5% (536.6 million people) and is predicted to increase to 12.2% (783 million) by 2045. 1 Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is the standardized measurement of glycemic control used for patients with DM, because of its standardization and high correlation with the average blood glucose value. 2 Despite the advantages of HbA1c, it is not a conclusive indicator for ascertaining long-term blood sugar levels, as it does not consider the variations in the correlation between HbA1c and average glucose level among individuals. Therefore, using HbA1c as the sole indicator to monitor blood glucose control can lead to mistakes in treatment planning and the prevention of DM complications, particularly chronic kidney disease. 3–5 The variations in potential underlying mechanisms can result in HbA1c concentrations that do not accurately reflect prevailing glycemia, as they are the net product of multiple reactions and processes. Consequently, it is essential to use a collection of indicators for monitoring blood glucose control. Studies on glycation gap (GG) have been conducted with initial promising results. GG is defined as the difference between the measured concentration of HbA1c and the concentration that would be predicted from its regression on the fructosamine concentration. Fructosamine presents several advantages over mean blood glucose when assessing non-glycemic determinants of HbA1c. First, fructosamine level is more stable than glucose itself. Second, fructosamine represents the two-week blood glucose exposure, whereas frequent seven-point blood glucose profiles or continuous blood glucose monitoring is required to evaluate mean glucose. Fructosamine, in contradistinction to mean blood glucose, allows for the comparison of the protein glycation difference between extracellular space (fructosamine) and intracellular space (HbA1c in red blood cells and, by assumption, in target tissues). Studies conducted in s -Abstract Truncated-
endocrinology & metabolism