Abstract:Background and objectives: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the most serious complications after laparoscopic anus-preserving surgery for rectal cancer, which significantly prolongs the patient's hospital stay, leads to dysfunction, and even increases the patient's perioperative morbidity and mortality, and little is known about the effectiveness of anastomotic reinforcement sutures to prevent AL. Thus, this study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of anastomotic reinforcement sutures as a means to prevent AL during laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Methods: A comprehensive and systematic search was performed in the literature database by combining subject and free terms up to 10 October 2023. The overall literature included was integrated and analyzed using Stata 12.0 software and Review Manager version 5.4 software to assess the effect of anastomotic reinforcement sutures on the incidence of AL. Results: A total of 2,452 patients from 14 studies were included, and an integrated analysis showed that the use of anastomotic reinforcement sutures significantly reduced the incidence of AL [odds ratio (OR) = 0.26; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.18–0.37; P < 0.00001; I 2 = 0%]. However, the findings confirmed whether or not the anastomosis reinforced with sutures did not affect the incidence of anastomotic stenosis (OR = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.37–1.32; P = 0.27; I 2 = 0%). We performed subgroup analyses of the results of the study, the randomized controlled studies (OR = 0.31; 95% CI, 0.15–0.65; P < 0.001) as well as retrospective studies (OR = 0.28; 95% CI, 0.19–0.41; P < 0.001), 3–0 sutures (OR = 0.28; 95% CI, 0.17–0.45; P < 0.001) versus 4–0 sutures (OR = 0.26; 95% CI, 0.13–0.53; P < 0.001), barbed wire sutures (OR = 0.26; 95% CI, 0.14–0.48; P < 0.001) versus non-barbed wire sutures (OR = 0.30; 95% CI, 0.20–0.46; P < 0.001), interrupted (OR = 0.30, 95% CI, 0.20–0.46; P < 0.001) versus continuous sutures (OR = 0.29, 95% CI, 0.16–0.51; P < 0.001) to the anastomosis, full-thickness suture (OR = 0.29; 95% CI, 0.16–0.51; P < 0.001) versus sutured with the seromuscular layer (OR = 0.27; 95% CI, 0.14–0.53; P < 0.001), anastomotic sutured in one (OR = 0.27; 95% CI, 0.14–0.53; P < 0.001) versus non-one circle (OR = 0.30; 95% CI, 0.20–0.44; P < 0.001), and reinforcing sutures to the dog-ear area (OR = 0.26; 95% CI, 0.14–0.50; P < 0.001) versus the non–dog-ear area (OR = 0.30; 95% CI, 0.20–0.45; P < 0.001), which have suggested that there is no significant difference between each other and that all of them reduce the incidence of AL. Conclusions: This study provides evidence that performing reinforcement suturing of the anastomosis during laparoscopic rectal surgery significantly lowers the incidence of postoperative AL but has no significant effect on anastomotic stenosis. It is important to note that further randomized controlled studies are required to confirm this conclusion. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022368631.

Effect of monetary incentives on performance after traumatic brain injury.

Comprehensive Abdominal Composition Evaluation of Rectal Cancer Patients with Anastomotic Leakage Compared with Body Mass Index-Matched Controls

Clinical Analysis of 9 Cases of a Novel Stent Assisted Intestinal Bypass for Preventing Anastomotic Leakage in Laparoscopic Assisted Radical Resection of Rectal Cancer

[Incidence and risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer].

Risk and early predictive factors of anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer

Risk Factors of Symptomatic Anastomotic Leakage and Its Impacts on a Long-Term Survival after Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: a Retrospective Single-Center Study.

Outcomes based on risk assessment of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery.

[Risk Factors of Anastomotic Leakage after Robotic Surgery for Low and Mid Rectal Cancer].

Multivariance Analysis of Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage after Anterior Peritoneal Resection of Rectal Carcinoma

Early Prediction of Anastomotic Leakage after Laparoscopic Rectal Surgery Using Creactive Protein

Risk Factors for Symptomatic Anastomotic Leakage After Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer with 30 Gy/10 f/2 w Preoperative Radiotherapy

Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer (RALAR study): A nationwide retrospective study of the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology Colorectal Cancer Network Collaborative Group

Analysis of Risk Factors of Anastomotic Leakage after Anus-Preserving Operation for Mid-Low Rectal Cancer

The Aortic Calcification Index is a Risk Factor Associated with Anastomotic Leakage after Anterior Resection of Rectal Cancer.

Detection and Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease

Risk factors for anastomotic leakage in colonic procedures within an ERAS‐protocol. A retrospective cohort study from the Swedish part of the international ERAS‐database

Risk factors of the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) after ileostomy reversal in rectal cancer patient

A case-control study of gynecomastia in HIV-1-infected patients receiving HAART.

Risk factors of anastomotic leak in colorectal cancer: a multicentric study in a Latin American country

Effectiveness of anastomotic reinforcement sutures in reducing anastomotic leakage risk after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a pooled and integration analysis

The impact of anastomotic leakage characteristics on the occurrence of anastomotic stenosis after colorectal resection, a retrospective cohort study