The Young and Nearby Normal Type Ia Supernova 2018gv: UV-optical Observations and the Earliest Spectropolarimetry

Yi Yang,Peter Hoeflich,Dietrich Baade,Justyn R. Maund,Lifan Wang,Peter. J. Brown,Heloise F. Stevance,Iair Arcavi,Jamison Burke,Aleksandar Cikota,Alejandro Clocchiatti,Avishay Gal-Yam,Melissa. L. Graham,Daichi Hiramatsu,Griffin Hosseinzadeh,D. Andrew Howell,Saurabh W. Jha,Curtis McCully,Ferdinando Patat,David. J. Sand,Steve Schulze,Jason Spyromilio,Stefano Valenti,József Vinkó,Xiaofeng Wang,J. Craig Wheeler,Ofer Yaron,Jujia Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aba759
IF: 5.521
2020-10-01
The Astrophysical Journal
Abstract:Abstract The nondetection of companion stars in SN Ia progenitor systems lends support to the notion of double-degenerate systems and explosions triggered by the merging of two white dwarfs. This very asymmetric process should lead to a conspicuous polarimetric signature. By contrast, observations consistently find very low continuum polarization as the signatures from the explosion process largely dominate over the pre-explosion configuration within several days. Critical information about the interaction of the ejecta with a companion and any circumstellar matter is encoded in the early polarization spectra. In this study, we obtain spectropolarimetry of SN 2018gv with the ESO Very Large Telescope at −13.6 days relative to the B -band maximum light, or ∼5 days after the estimated explosion—the earliest spectropolarimetric observations to date of any SN Ia. These early observations still show a low continuum polarization (≲0.2%) and moderate line polarization (0.30% ± 0.04% for the prominent Si ii λ 6355 feature and 0.85% ± 0.04% for the high-velocity Ca component). The high degree of spherical symmetry implied by the low-line and continuum polarization at this early epoch is consistent with explosion models of delayed detonations and is inconsistent with the merger-induced explosion scenario. The dense UV and optical photometry and optical spectroscopy within the first ∼100 days after the maximum light indicate that SN 2018gv is a normal SN Ia with similar spectrophotometric behavior to SN 2011fe.
astronomy & astrophysics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?