Abstract:Abstract Liquefaction is the process of changing the nature of the soil from a solid state to a liquid state caused by cyclic loads during an earthquake. Liquidation occurs in non-cohesive soils (silt to sand) that contain many macro pores, so the ability to hold or bind the water is small. In general, liquefaction occurs in earthquakes above 5 Mw and has shallow groundwater conditions. The city of Surabaya has an earthquake potential of 6.5 Mw and has shallow ground water level. This is what underlies the authors to analyze the potential liquefaction in Surabaya. The liquefaction potential is analyzed by utilizing the Youd-Idriss method (1996) and the Cetin method (2004). A case study selected for this study is located at Porject X, Central of Surabaya. The liquefaction analysis was performed by considering four CPT data which have depth of 9m - 14.2 m. The liquefaction potential is expressed by the CRR (cyclic resistance ratio) and CSR (cyclic shear ratio), whick will be influenced the factor of safety (FS). If the FS is more than or equal to 1 than the no soil liquefaction is predicted to occur. Differently, soil liquefaction is concluded to occur if FS is less than 1. The Results of Youd-Idriss method (1996) show that the CRR and CSR are about 0.09 to 2.88 and 0.33 to 0.43, respectively. The FS value is about 0.21 to 7.60. Furthermore, CRR and CSR values obtained by using Cetin method (2004) are about 0.04 to 0.06 and 0.22 to 0.36, respectively. The FS value is about 0.15 to 0.23. From the results of the analysis can be concluded that the FS values produced by Cetin (2004) is smaller as compared to Youd-Idriss method (1996) Keywords: Liquefaction, Liquefaction Analysis, CPT, FS. Abstrak Likuifaksi adalah proses berubahnya sifat tanah dari keadaan padat menjadi keadaan cair yang disebabkan oleh beban siklik pada waktu terjadi gempa. Likuifaksi terjadi pada tanah non kohesif (lanau sampai pasir) yang mengandung banyak pori makro, sehingga kemampuan menahan atau mengikat airnya kecil. Pada umumnya likuifaksi terjadi pada gempa di atas 5 Mw dan memiliki kondisi muka air tanah yang dangkal. Kota Surabaya memiliki potensi gempa sebesar 6,5 Mw dan memiliki muka air tanah yang dangkal. Hal inilah yang mendasari penulis melakukan analisis potensi likuifaksi di Surabaya. Metode evaluasi potensi likuifaksi yang digunakan adalah metode Youd-Idriss (1996) dan metode Cetin (2004). Studi kasus yang di analisa berlokasi di Proyek-X, Surabaya Pusat. Analisis tersebut dilakukan dengan menggunakan empat titik sondir dari data CPT yang memiliki kedalaman 9 m – 14,2 m. Hasil analisis potensi likuifaksi yang diperoleh dari ke dua metode berupa nilai CRR ( Cyclic Resistance Ratio ) dan CSR (Cyclic Stress Ratio) , yang akan mempengaruhi besar kecilnya nilai faktor keamanan (FS). Jika nilai nilai FS ≥1 maka tidak ada potensi likuifaksi. Sebaliknya jika nilai FS<1 maka ada potensi likuifaksi. Hasil analisis dengan metode Youd-Idriss (1996) menunjukkan bahwa Nilai CRR dan CSR yang diperoleh adalah antara 0,09-2,88 dan 0,33 – 0,43, secara berurutan. Nilai FS yang dihasilkan antara 0,21 – 7,60. Sedangkan hasil analisis dengan metode Cetin (2004) menunjukkan bahwa nilai CRR dan CSR yang lebih kecil, yaitu antara 0,04-0,06 dan 0,22 - 0,36, secara berurutan. Nilai FS yang dihasilkan antara 0,15-0,23. Dari hasil analisis dapat disimpulkan bahwa nilai FS yang dihasilkan metode Cetin (2004) lebih kecil dibandingkan dengan metode Youd-Idriss (1996). Kata kunci : Likuifaksi, Analisis likuifaksi, CPT, FS.

Analisis Pengelompokan Gempa Bumi di Indonesia Berdasarkan Ruang-Waktu-Kekuatan Kedalaman

Integration of Microtremor and PS-INSAR Analysis to Investigate the Susceptible Area in the Pronojiwo District (Indonesia) Following the 2021 East Java M6.1 Earthquake

Earthquake disaster map using GIS analysis: a case study of Bener Meriah-Aceh, Indonesia

Spatial and Temporal Analysis of b-value Imaging Characteristics Using High Precision Earthquake Spot in the Sumatran Subduction Zone

Identification of active faults in West Java, Indonesia, based on earthquake hypocenter determination, relocation, and focal mechanism analysis

Analysis of susceptible disaster region based on the peak ground acceleration and earthquake intensity in Mamasa 2018

SPATIAL INSIGHTS INTO EARTHQUAKE STRENGTH: A SULAWESI CASE STUDY USING ORDINARY AND ROBUST KRIGING METHODS

NONLINEAR TIME HISTORY PADA FONDASI TIANG PANCANG DENGAN PROGRAM MIDAS GTS NX

Sistem Pengambilan Keputusan Penanganan Bencana Alam Gempa Bumi Di Indonesia

GPS velocities and uniform slip rates across Siulak and Dikit segments: implication to segmentation and seismic moment deficits along Sumatran fault system

Application of Moving Average (MA) and Upward Continuation Methods to Bouguer Gravity Anomaly Data for Fault Analysis of the Earthquake Risk Area of Timor and Flores Islands

Analisis Resiko Bencana Gempa Bumi Serta Strategi Implementasi Sistem Informasi Manajemen untuk Mitigasi Bencana di Lombok Tengah

Determination of Earthquake Hypocenter Distribution using the Modified Joint Hypocenter Determination (MJHD) Method throughout the Palu-Koro Fault (Case Study: August-October, 2018)

COMPARISON OF EARTHQUAKE HYPOCENTER RELOCATION METHODS IN THE JAVA REGION, INDONESIA

Natural disaster mitigation using geophysical methods

Focal mechanism and source determination of the Padang Lawas earthquake april 30, 2020, using moment tensor inversion

Complex Multiple-Segment Ruptures of the 28 September 2018, Sulawesi,Indonesia, Earthquake

Hypocenter Relocation along the Sunda Arc in Indonesia, Using a 3D Seismic‐Velocity Model

Analysis of the mentawai region fault field based on earthquake relocation data using the modified joint hypocenter determination (MJHD) method

Analisis Potensi Likuifaksi dengan Data CPT (Cone Penetration Test) Studi Kasus Proyek-X di Surabaya Pusat

Prediction of Susceptible Areas of Future Earthquake Induced by Landslides in Padang Pariaman District, West Sumatera, Indonesia