Decision analysis in cardiac surgery: a scoping review and methodological primer
Dominique Vervoort,Grace S Lee,Hillary Lia,Abdul Muqtader Afzal,Derrick Y Tam,Maral Ouzounian,Johanna J M Takkenberg,Harindra C Wijeysundera,Stephen E Fremes
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezae123
IF: 4.534
2024-03-27
European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
Abstract:Abstract OBJECTIVES Randomized controlled trials are the gold standard for evidence generation in medicine but are limited by their real-world generalizability, resource needs, shorter follow-up durations, and inability to be conducted for all clinical questions. Decision analysis models may simulate trials and observational studies by using existing data and evidence- and expert-informed assumptions, and extend analyses over longer time horizons, different study populations, and specific scenarios, helping to translate population outcomes to patient-specific clinical and economic outcomes. Here, we present a scoping review and methodological primer on decision analysis for cardiac surgery research. METHODS A scoping review was performed using the PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases for cardiac surgery decision analysis studies published until December 2021. Articles were summarized descriptively to quantify trends and ascertain methodological consistency. RESULTS 184 articles were identified, among which Markov models (N = 92, 50.0%) were the most commonly used models. The most common outcomes were costs (N = 107, 58.2%), quality-adjusted life-years (N = 96, 52.2%), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (N = 89, 48.4%). Most (N = 165, 89.7%) articles applied sensitivity analyses, most frequently in the form of deterministic sensitivity analyses (N = 128, 69.6%). Reporting of guidelines to inform the model development and/or reporting was present in 22.3% of articles. CONCLUSION Decision analysis methods are increasing but remain limited and highly variable in cardiac surgery. A methodological primer is presented and may provide researchers with the foundation to start with or improve decision analysis, as well as provide readers and reviewers with the fundamental concepts to review decision analysis studies.
surgery,cardiac & cardiovascular systems,respiratory system