Young adult impaired driving behaviors and perceived norms of driving under the influence of simultaneous alcohol and cannabis use

Brittney A. Hultgren,Miranda L. M. Delawalla,Victoria Szydlowski,Katarina Guttmannova,Jennifer M. Cadigan,Jason R. Kilmer,Christine M. Lee,Mary E. Larimer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.15459
2024-12-02
Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research
Abstract:Among Washington State young adults, most perceived driving under the influence of simultaneous alcohol and marijuana/cannabis (DUI‐SAM) and riding with a SAM impaired driver (RWI‐SAM) as unacceptable for their peers (i.e., injunctive norms). More permissive injunctive norms were associated with DUI‐SAM and RWI‐SAM. Descriptive (i.e., how frequent) peer norms were associated with RWI‐SAM only. Replication of these findings would provide support for development and evaluation of interventions focused on changing normative beliefs for DUI and RWI behaviors. Background Impaired driving behaviors among young adults who are under the influence of simultaneous alcohol and marijuana/cannabis (SAM) use are associated with increased risks of motor vehicle accidents and resulting increased injury and mortality. Exploration of associations with descriptive and injunctive norms may have prevention implications. Methods Young adults (aged 18–25; N = 1941) in the 2019 cohort of the Washington Young Adult Health Survey comprised study participants. Associations between descriptive norms (estimates of other's frequency of driving under the influence of SAM [DUI‐SAM] and riding with a SAM impaired driver [RWI‐SAM]), injunctive norms (perceived approval or disapproval of DUI‐SAM and RWI‐SAM for young adults in their community), and past month DUI and RWI behaviors were assessed with logistic regression models, adjusting for covariates and applying post‐stratification weights. Results DUI‐SAM was reported by 2.7% and almost double (5.3%) reported RWI‐SAM at least once in the past month. Almost half of the participants believed the average young adults in Washington State engaged in DUI‐SAM (49.8%) and RWI‐SAM (48.7%) at least once a month in the past year (i.e., descriptive norms). The majority reported DUI‐SAM (68.8%) and RWI‐SAM (67.6%) to be totally unacceptable for young adults in their community (i.e., injunctive norms). In models adjusting for covariates including SAM use frequency and corresponding injunctive norms, descriptive norms were not associated with DUI, but were positively associated with RWI‐SAM. However, after controlling for SAM use frequency and descriptive norms, higher perceived approval (i.e., injunctive norms) was significantly associated with increased odds of all DUI and RWI behaviors. Conclusions Injunctive norms for SAM impaired driving behaviors may be a promising intervention focus for DUI and RWI behaviors. Future research is needed to replicate these findings to determine if development and evaluation of individual and community‐based interventions focused on changing normative beliefs are warranted.
substance abuse
What problem does this paper attempt to address?