Intraocular Lens Formula Comparison of Flanged Intrascleral Intraocular Lens Fixation with Double Needle Technique
Daniel S Malach,John Michael Guest,Christopher Adam,Jonah Joffe,Kim Le,Chaesik Kim,Xihui Lin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S389325
2023-03-12
Clinical Ophthalmology
Abstract:Daniel S Malach, 1 John Michael Guest, 1 Christopher Adam, 1 Jonah Joffe, 2 Kim Le, 2 Chaesik Kim, 1 Xihui Lin 1 1 Kresge Eye Institute/Wayne State University Department of Ophthalmology, Detroit, MI, USA; 2 Henry Ford Hospital Department of Ophthalmology, Detroit, MI, USA Correspondence: Xihui Lin, Kresge Eye Institute/Wayne State University Department of Ophthalmology, 4717 St. Antoine, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA, Email Purpose: To analyze visual outcomes and accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas in predicting postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing flanged intrascleral IOL fixation. Design: Case Series. Subjects: Twenty-three patients who had undergone secondary IOL placement using flanged intrascleral fixation technique. Methods: Retrospective chart review. Main Outcome Measures: Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and postoperative spherical equivalent based on manifest refraction. Results: Visual acuity improved from 20/577 to 20/58. Overall, the actual refraction was 0.06 D more myopic than predicted. Holladay 2, Sanders Retzlaff Kraff/Theoretical (SRK/T) and Barrett Universal II resulted in mild myopic surprise (− 0.55, − 0.18 and − 0.20 D). Haigis and Hill-RBF (Radial Basis Function) resulted in mild hyperopic surprise (+0.28 and +0.28 D). Hoffer Q and Holladay 1 were the most accurate (− 0.02D and − 0.08 D). Conclusion: Flanged intrascleral IOL fixation improved vision even in patients with other posterior segment pathologies. The effective lens positioning is likely similar to in-the-bag positioning. Hoffer Q and Holladay 1 formulas with in-the-bag calculations were the most accurate. Keywords: aphakia, cataract, flanged technique, refractive, secondary intraocular lens The ideal surgical outcome of cataract extraction results in intracapsular implantation of an intraocular lens (IOL). However, certain patient factors may preclude placement of an intracapsular lens, including Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome, Marfan Syndrome, ocular trauma with zonular loss or instability, and intraoperative challenges resulting in damage to the capsular bag or zonular apparatus. In these instances, several techniques exist to facilitate placement of asecondary IOL including anterior chamber or sulcus placement, iris fixation or scleral fixation. 1,2 Anumber of methods of scleral fixation have been utilized, including suture fixation, fibrin glue, scleral pockets, or other sutureless techniques. 3–6,8 Dr.Shin Yamane first introduced his flanged double needle technique for scleral fixation of an IOL at the World Ophthalmology Conference in 2014. 8 Since that time, several studies have reported good visual outcomes with alow incidence of intra- and postoperative complications. 8–11 Prior to the double needle technique, amodified version of the single needle Yamane technique had been used with repeated success. 7 However, there is apaucity of literature regarding which currently available IOL formula is most accurate in predicting postoperative refractive outcomes in this patient population. The goal of this study is to analyze the refractive outcomes of patients undergoing flanged intrascleral intraocular lens fixation and to compare the accuracy of currently available IOL formulas in predicting postoperative refractive outcomes. Electronic medical records of all adult patients at the Kresge Eye Institute, Detroit, Michigan, who had undergone secondary intraocular lens placement with the flanged intrascleral fixation technique from 2014 to 2019 were reviewed. In instances of successive bilateral surgery, both eyes were used in the study analysis individually. Exclusion criteria included insufficient follow-up data, surgical complications resulting in an inability to place ascleral-fixated lens, or ahistory of keratorefractive surgery. Study approval was obtained from the Wayne State University Institutional Review Board. Research adhered to the Tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice. Patient data collected for analysis included age, gender, ethnicity, ocular comorbidities, reason for secondary IOL, optical biometry measurements, axial length (AL) measurement, preoperative and postoperative corrective distance visual acuity (CDVA), preoperative and postoperative spherical equivalent based on manifest refraction, and intraoperative and postoperative complications. The axial length was measured using optical biometry (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, IOLMaster ® 500, Jena, Germany). In the instance of poor signal strength with optical biometry, applanation ultrasound biometry was used for -Abstract Truncated-