Supporting surgeons after adverse events: five minutes with . . . Kevin Turner

Abi Rimmer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q280
2024-02-03
BMJ
Abstract:"The basis for the Support (surgeon peer-led post-incident response teams) Improvement Collaborative1 is a recognition that surgeons are harmed when things go wrong in surgery."It's important, of course, that we recognise that the person who is harmed the most is the patient, and next are the people who love that patient. But it's a matter of fact that a significant number of surgeons are adversely affected when things go wrong in surgery. Fifty per cent of surgeons who recall an adverse event would say, for example, that their sleep was affected adversely by being involved in that event."We also know that surgeons are the least likely of any doctors to engage with existing support mechanisms. This collaborative is not about denigrating those existing support mechanisms, but we know that surgeons don't use them. So there's a problem that needs addressing, because surgeons are being harmed and they're not being looked...
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?