Brominated flame retardants and heavy metals in common aquatic products from the pearl river delta, south china: Bioaccessibility assessment and human health implications

Yunjiang Yu,Liting Liu,Xichao Chen,Mingdeng Xiang,Zongrui Li,Yu Liu,Yuan Zeng,Yajing Han,Ziling Yu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124036

IF: 13.6

2021-02-01

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Abstract:<p>Aquatic products are an important source of environmental pollutants to humans. This study was conducted to assess the bioaccessibility of selected brominated flame retardants and heavy metals in common aquatic products from the Pearl River Delta, South China, as well as associated human health risks. Based on a questionnaire survey, ten of the most consumed aquatic products were collected from local markets. The bioaccessibility of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDDs), and heavy metals was assessed using an in vitro gastrointestinal model. Bioaccessibility of heavy metals (33.0–84.0%) and HBCDDs (38.5–68.4%) was significantly higher than that of PBDEs (13.4–65.4%). Total non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risks from heavy metal consumption were much higher than the threshold values due to excessive abundances of arsenic in shellfish (HQ = 2.45, CR = 1.1 ×10^-3). Furthermore, middle-aged populations and females were subjected to greater health risks due to different intakes of aquatic products among age and gender groups. Significant difference in bioaccessibility among analytes indicated that bioaccessibility of pollutants is non-negligible in health risk assessment. This is the first study systematically investigating health risks of aquatic products consumption and concludes that shellfish is a great cause for concern for the PRD residents.</p>

environmental sciences,engineering, environmental

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper primarily explores the bioavailability assessment of brominated flame retardants (BFRs, including polybrominated diphenyl ethers PBDEs and hexabromocyclododecane HBCDDs) and heavy metals (including arsenic As, cadmium Cd, copper Cu, manganese Mn, lead Pb, and zinc Zn) in common aquatic products in the Pearl River Delta (PRD) region and their impact on human health.

Specifically, the main objectives of the study include:

1. **Pollutant Concentration Measurement**: Based on questionnaire survey results, select the 10 most common aquatic products in the local area (including freshwater fish, marine fish, and shellfish) and measure the content of PBDEs, HBCDDs, and heavy metals in them.

2. **Bioavailability Assessment**: Use an in vitro digestion model to evaluate the bioavailability of the aforementioned pollutants in these aquatic products.

3. **Health Risk Assessment**: Based on the original content and bioavailable content, assess the non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic health risks posed by consuming these aquatic products.

The study found that the content of heavy metals (especially arsenic) in shellfish was significantly higher than in freshwater fish and marine fish, and the overall non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic health risks exceeded the safety threshold. This is mainly due to the high arsenic content in shellfish. Additionally, different intake levels among different age groups and genders result in middle-aged people and women facing higher health risks.

In summary, the study reveals that residents of the Pearl River Delta region may be exposed to high levels of heavy metal pollution through the consumption of common aquatic products, particularly the arsenic content in shellfish products, which deserves attention. The study emphasizes the necessity of considering the bioavailability of pollutants in health risk assessments.