Securing Your Airspace: Detection of Drones Trespassing Protected Areas

Alireza Famili,Angelos Stavrou,Haining Wang,Jung-Min (Jerry) Park,Ryan Gerdes
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s24072028
IF: 3.9
2024-03-23
Sensors
Abstract:Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) deployment has risen rapidly in recent years. They are now used in a wide range of applications, from critical safety-of-life scenarios like nuclear power plant surveillance to entertainment and hobby applications. While the popularity of drones has grown lately, the associated intentional and unintentional security threats require adequate consideration. Thus, there is an urgent need for real-time accurate detection and classification of drones. This article provides an overview of drone detection approaches, highlighting their benefits and limitations. We analyze detection techniques that employ radars, acoustic and optical sensors, and emitted radio frequency (RF) signals. We compare their performance, accuracy, and cost under different operating conditions. We conclude that multi-sensor detection systems offer more compelling results, but further research is required.
engineering, electrical & electronic,chemistry, analytical,instruments & instrumentation
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper primarily explores the security challenges brought about by the rapid proliferation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) in recent years, particularly the issue of unauthorized or malicious entry into protected areas. To address these challenges, the paper reviews various UAV detection methods and analyzes their advantages and disadvantages. The core objective of the paper is to provide a comprehensive overview, introducing the currently available UAV detection technologies and discussing the design space and inherent or situational limitations of each technology. Specifically, the following detection methods are discussed in the paper: 1. **Radar Systems**: Radar technology is considered one of the most effective means of UAV detection due to its ability to provide long-range coverage under various weather conditions, day and night. However, radar also has its limitations, such as the small radar cross-section (RCS) of small-sized UAVs, which may be difficult for traditional radar to detect. Additionally, radar is costly and requires specific deployment conditions. 2. **Acoustic Sensors**: Acoustic sensors use the unique noise generated by UAVs to identify and track them. This method is low-cost but performs poorly in noisy environments and has a limited maximum detection range (usually within a few hundred meters). Nevertheless, acoustic sensors perform well in certain application scenarios, especially when line-of-sight is not required. 3. **Radio Frequency (RF) Signal Detection**: This method relies on the radio signals emitted by UAVs for localization. It can work in various environments but cannot detect UAVs when they are flying autonomously or not emitting signals. 4. **Visual and Optical Sensors**: Visual sensors can provide additional information to classify UAV types and record images as evidence. However, this method has a shorter detection range and is significantly affected by weather conditions. 5. **Multi-Sensor Fusion**: Combining the advantages of multiple sensors can improve overall detection performance and robustness. Although this method is more costly and increases computational complexity, it performs better under different environmental conditions. In summary, the paper aims to provide a reference for selecting appropriate UAV detection solutions by comparing the pros and cons of different UAV detection technologies. It particularly emphasizes that multi-sensor fusion may be the direction for future development, as it can largely overcome the limitations of individual sensors.