Maternity care practices supportive of breastfeeding in U.S. advanced neonatal care units, United States, 2022

E. Anstey,A. Noiman,E. Boundy,J. Nelson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-024-02139-3

2024-10-09

Journal of Perinatology

Abstract:To describe breastfeeding-supportive practices in U.S. maternity hospitals with advanced neonatal care units (ANCU).

pediatrics,obstetrics & gynecology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Changes in maternity care policies and practices that support breastfeeding as measured by the Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding — United States, 2018–2022

Kristin J. Marks,Lucas Gosdin,Lauren E. O’Connor,Heather C. Hamner,Daurice A. Grossniklaus

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06672-z

2024-07-13

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Abstract:Experiences during the birth hospitalization affect a family's ability to establish and maintain breastfeeding. The Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding (Ten Steps) describe evidence-based hospital policies and practices shown to improve breastfeeding outcomes. We aim to describe hospitals' implementation of the Ten Steps, changes over time, and hospitals' implementation of a majority (≥ 6) of the Ten Steps by hospital characteristics and state.

obstetrics & gynecology
Alignment of State Regulations With Breastfeeding and Beverage Best Practices for Childcare Centers and Family Childcare Homes, United States

Danielle L. Lee,Raquel Traseira,Sophia Navarro,Natasha Frost,Sara E. Benjamin-Neelon,Angie L. Cradock,Ken Hecht,Lorrene D. Ritchie

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0033354920964156

2020-11-09

Public Health Reports

Abstract:Objectives Childcare is an important setting for nutrition; nearly half of young children in the United States participate in licensed childcare, where they consume up to two-thirds of their daily dietary intake. We compared state regulations for childcare with best practices to support breastfeeding and healthy beverage provision. Methods We reviewed regulations for childcare centers (centers) and family childcare homes (homes) in effect May–July 2016 and rated all 50 states for inclusion (1 = not included, 2 = partially included, 3 = fully included) of 12 breastfeeding and beverage best practices. We calculated average ratings for 6 practices specific to infants aged 0-11 months, 6 practices specific to children aged 1-6 years, and all 12 practices, by state and across all states. We assessed significant differences between centers and homes for each best practice by using McNemar–Bowker tests for symmetry, and we assessed differences across states by using paired student t tests. Results States included best practices in regulations for centers more often than for homes. Average ratings (standard deviations) in regulations across all states were significantly higher in centers than in homes for infant best practices (2.1 [0.5] vs 1.8 [0.5], P < .001), child best practices (2.1 [0.6] vs 1.8 [0.6], P = .002), and all 12 best practices combined (2.1 [0.5] vs 1.8 [0.6], P < .001). Conclusions Although best practices were more consistently included in regulations for centers than for homes, many state childcare regulations did not include best practices to support breastfeeding and the provision of healthy beverages. Findings can be used to inform efforts to improve regulations and to reduce differences between centers and homes.

public, environmental & occupational health
Healthcare Professionals' Attitudes and Practices in Supporting and Promoting the Breastfeeding of Preterm Infants in NICUs

Khulood Kayed Shattnawi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ANC.0000000000000421

Abstract:Background: Breastfeeding preterm infants is shown to have important health benefits for both infants and mothers. A positive relationship between mothers and healthcare teams and supportive practices tend to facilitate maternal competence and promote early initiation of breastfeeding within neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Purpose: The aim of this study was to understand attitudes and behaviors of healthcare professionals toward breastfeeding practices and supporting mothers of preterm infants. Methods: This study adopted an ethnographic research design that involved 135 hours of participant observation over a 6-month period and semistructured interviews of 10 nurses and 5 physicians. Results: Data analysis suggests that while staff members agree with the benefits of breastfeeding for preterm infants, the actual implementation of a breastfeeding policy within NICUs is problematic. Three key themes emerged. The first described the contradiction that exists between the staff beliefs and behaviors in relation to breastfeeding and supporting mothers. The second theme was related to staff working conditions, which described the lack of institutional support and barriers to supporting breastfeeding. The final theme of controlling relationships captured the essence of the practitioner to mother association. Together, these elements revealed a situation whereby the staff appeared more preoccupied with addressing the task of caring for the babies than with supporting mothers in feeding and subsequently caring for their preterm children. Implications for practice: The institutional barriers to breastfeeding promotion within NICUs should be addressed by healthcare providers. Actions that provide a supportive environment within NICUs for both mothers and nurses are essential to improve the overall quality of care. Implications for research: Future research may include an examination of hospital policies and practices of promoting breastfeeding for preterm infants.
Barriers and Facilitators in Lactation Support for the Preterm Mother–Infant Dyad: An Integrated Approach

An Eerdekens,Anne Debeer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/08903344241273450

2024-09-28

Journal of Human Lactation

Abstract:Journal of Human Lactation, Ahead of Print. Breastfeeding offers significant health benefits for both mothers and infants, particularly preterm infants, where it serves as a therapeutic strategy to reduce mortality and morbidities. However, breastfeeding practices are threatened globally by societal norms and systemic barriers at both micro and macro levels. This paper explores the complex interplay of these barriers and facilitators, focusing on the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) setting. Preterm infants face specific feeding challenges due to immature physiological functions, yet evidence supports that strategies like cue-based feeding and individualized care can enhance feeding success and health outcomes. For mothers, initiating and maintaining lactation after preterm birth is critical but challenging, with early lactation support and achieving sufficient milk volume being key predictors of success. Partner support significantly influences lactation outcomes, although more inclusive research is needed for diverse family structures. In the NICU, a multidisciplinary approach to lactation care is vital, emphasizing the need for experienced staff and family-centered practices. NICU design, policies promoting parental presence, and adherence to Baby-friendly Hospital Initiative guidelines further support breastfeeding. This paper aims to provide directives for local breastfeeding policies through an integrated approach, considering societal attitudes and healthcare practices. The findings advocate for improved lactation support in NICUs, inclusive language and policies, and further research into diverse familial and gender roles in breastfeeding.

nursing,pediatrics,obstetrics & gynecology
Effect of Neonatal Unit Interventions Designed to Increase Breastfeeding in Preterm Infants: An Overview of Systematic Reviews

Cathie Hilditch,Alice R. Rumbold,Amy Keir,Philippa Middleton,Judith Gomersall

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000536660

2024-03-21

Neonatology

Abstract:Introduction: This overview aims to systematically review evidence regarding effects of interventions undertaken in neonatal units to increase breastfeeding in preterm infants. Methods: We followed Cochrane methodology. Systematic reviews published to October 31, 2022, reporting meta-analysis of effects from original studies on breastfeeding rates in preterm infants of neonatal unit interventions designed to increase breastfeeding were included. Results: Avoidance of bottles during breastfeed establishment (comparator breastfeeds with bottle-feeds) demonstrated clear evidence of benefit for any breastfeeding at discharge and exclusive breastfeeding 3 months post-discharge, and possible evidence of benefit for exclusive breastfeeding at discharge, and any breastfeeding post-discharge. Kangaroo mother care (KMC) (comparator usual care) demonstrated clear evidence of benefit for any and exclusive breastfeeding at discharge and possible benefit for any breastfeeding post-discharge. Quality improvement (QI) bundle(s) to enable breastfeeds (comparator conventional care) showed possible evidence of benefit for any breastfeeding at discharge. Cup feeding (comparator other supplemental enteral feeding forms) demonstrated possible evidence of benefit for exclusive breastfeeding at discharge and any breastfeeding 3 months after. Early onset KMC (commenced <24 h post-birth), oral stimulation, and oropharyngeal colostrum administration, showed no evidence of benefit. No meta-analyses reported pooled effects for gestational age or birthweight subgroups. Conclusion: There is ample evidence to support investment in KMC, avoidance of bottles during breastfeed establishment, cup feeding, and QI bundles targeted at better supporting breastfeeding in neonatal units to increase prevalence of breastfeeding in preterm infants and promote equal access to breastmilk. Stratifying effects by relevant subgroups is a research priority.

pediatrics
Baby-Friendly Hospitals, Social Determinants of Health, and Disparities in Breastfeeding Initiation in a Low-Income Population, 2017–2020

Rebecca C. Robert,Amira A. Roess,Doris Kuehn,Swathi Vinjamuri

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/08903344241274306

2024-09-15

Journal of Human Lactation

Abstract:Journal of Human Lactation, Ahead of Print. Background:Organizational-level interventions (i.e., Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative) that support breastfeeding and target breastfeeding initiation are critical to reducing breastfeeding disparities and promoting breastfeeding equity.Research Aim:To determine the association between delivery in a Baby-Friendly accredited hospital and breastfeeding initiation among United States recipients of the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) in Washington DC, the majority of whom report their race as Black.Method:We conducted a secondary analysis of de-identified program data collected as part of routine WIC visits from the Washington DC WIC program, 2017–2020. Women who delivered a firstborn, singleton infant were included (N = 8,225). Multivariable logistic regression models accounted for social determinants of health and other factors. One set of models included a binary exposure variable (Baby-Friendly accredited vs. non-accredited hospitals), and another set included a categorical exposure variable for hospitals (1) Baby-Friendly accredited, (2) Baby-Friendly activities but not accredited, and (3) neither Baby-Friendly activities nor accredited.Results:Breastfeeding initiation was 57.4% (n = 1988) for women delivering in accredited hospitals versus 55.4% (n = 2540) in non-accredited hospitals and multivariable model results were non-significant (OR = 0.95, 95% CI [0.86, 1.05]). However, more women initiated breastfeeding who delivered in either accredited hospitals (57.4%, n = 1988) or hospitals with Baby-Friendly activities but not accredited (55.9%, n = 2430) compared to those delivering in hospitals with neither (45.3%, n = 110), and multivariable models results concurred (Baby-Friendly accredited hospitals OR = 1.44, 95% CI [1.07, 1.94]; Baby-Friendly activities but not accredited, (OR = 1.55, 95% CI [1.16, 2.09]).Conclusion:Organizational-level interventions that create hospital environments supportive of breastfeeding initiation are important to promote equity in breastfeeding, but underlying social determinants of breastfeeding outcomes must be addressed.

nursing,pediatrics,obstetrics & gynecology
Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine Clinical Protocol #19: Breastfeeding Promotion in the Prenatal Period (Revised 2024)

Anna Jack,Caroline Mullin,Elizabeth Brown,Michele Burtner,Katherine R Standish,Alecia Fields,Casey Rosen-Carole,Scott Hartman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2024.0203

Abstract:Background: The Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine revised the 2015 version of this clinical protocol to review the evidence and provide recommendations related to breastfeeding promotion in the prenatal period. Key Information: Promoting and normalizing breastfeeding in the prenatal period can improve breastfeeding outcomes including initiation and duration of breastfeeding. Ideally, prenatal interventions should be a part of a comprehensive longitudinal breastfeeding support program. Recommendations: Clinicians or other health workers should discuss breastfeeding at each prenatal visit. Counseling topics should include the health benefits of breastfeeding versus not breastfeeding, the basics of breastfeeding (e.g., physiology, positioning), what to expect of hospital-based and immediate postpartum breastfeeding support (i.e., Baby-Friendly Ten Steps), and the risks of unnecessary supplementation. Medical, anatomical, and other risk factors for breastfeeding challenges should be identified, and targeted anticipatory guidance should be given. Prenatal counseling should include distribution of structured breastfeeding education at low literacy levels and in the parent's preferred language. Counseling should be culturally sensitive and patient-centered, including family members when appropriate. Prenatal support may integrate various health workers (e.g., medical doctors, midwives, community health workers, lactation consultants, among others) and include various modalities including telecommunication. Enhancing breastfeeding education for prenatal care providers is also imperative. Additional themes related to implementation of recommendations for specific populations are also reviewed.
Do Breastfeeding Policies and Practices in Neonatal Intensive Care Units Differ by Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative Status?

Alexandria Richter,Sarah Gonzalez-Nahm,Sara Benjamin-Neelon

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2024.0015

2024-08-19

Abstract:Background: The Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) was launched in 1991 by the World Health Organization and United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund to promote and support breastfeeding within hospitals. Prior studies have assessed the associations between BFHI and breastfeeding, but there is limited evidence examining the policies and practices in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) that, in turn, may influence breastfeeding. Objective: The goal of this analysis was to assess whether BFHI status was associated with breastfeeding policies and practices in NICUs in a sample of U.S.-based hospitals. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was sent to hospital administrators at 1,285 facilities (817 BFHI and 468 non-BFHI) throughout all regions of the United States and assessed whether hospitals were implementing breastfeeding support policies and practices in NICUs. Pearson's chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests were performed to assess associations between BFHI status and reported 6 breastfeeding policies and 11 breastfeeding practices. Results: Among all 259 respondents (BFHI: 68/102 [67%], non-BFHI: 73/157 [47%]), Baby-Friendly® status was significantly associated with having specific breastfeeding practices in the NICU (67% versus 47%, p = 0.001). More BFHI compared with non-BFHI hospitals reported assessing milk supply of mothers (90% versus 75%, p = 0.026) and communicating the medical benefits of breastfeeding (91% versus 75%, p = 0.012) to new parents. There were, however, no differences by BFHI status in the other breastfeeding policies and practices.
Building a Comprehensive System of Breastfeeding and Lactation Care in the United States

Diane Spatz,Stephanie Acquaye

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2024.05.112

2024-06-21

Abstract:The steady decline in breastfeeding rates from birth to 6 months suggests that many lactating women would benefit from stronger systems of breastfeeding and lactation support (BFLS). The terms "breastfeeding support" or "lactation support" appear often in academic literature, in reports such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (yearly Breastfeeding Report Card, and on the websites of many of our birth hospitals. However, in both our informal and professional experiences at the bedside and in academia, we have not seen a comprehensive description of BFLS in the United States.

nursing,obstetrics & gynecology
Breastfeeding and Human Lactation Curriculum Survey of Midwifery Programs in the United States

Elaine Webber,Nadine Wodwaski,Deborah Busch

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13367

Abstract:Introduction: The health attributes and advantages of breastfeeding are well documented in the literature. Current research identifies the importance of comprehensive lactation knowledge among health care professionals to improve breastfeeding outcomes. Educational curricula to incorporate lactation content is necessary for student preparedness to provide competent care. Midwives are in a unique position to support, promote, and manage breastfeeding. The purpose of this study was to survey Accreditation Commission for Midwifery Education (ACME)-accredited midwifery education programs in the United States for their breastfeeding curricular content including opportunities for clinical experiences in managing and counseling breastfeeding parents. Methods: A descriptive survey was deployed online to midwifery programs listed by the American College of Nurse-Midwives, with a response completion rate of 44.7%. Data collection included program descriptors, hours of lactation content, educational topics, faculty preparation, use of simulation, and clinical breastfeeding experiences. Results: Descriptive analyses revealed differences among the midwifery education programs surveyed regarding the amount of lactation content and clinical opportunities. Two programs offer a course specific to breastfeeding, with the remaining programs providing lactation content threaded throughout their curricula; 29.4% of programs offer 3 to 4 hours of lactation content, 35.3% report 5 to 8 hours of content, and 11.8% provide at least 10 hours of content. One program reports 18+ hours of content provided in both didactic and clinical settings. All programs report providing breastfeeding clinical opportunities for students; 18% of programs offer simulation experiences. No programs report using standardized lactation clinical competencies. Discussion: Midwives play a pivotal role in breastfeeding promotion, counseling, and clinical support. Standardization of didactic lactation education will assist programs in future curriculum mapping. Given the variability of clinical settings and patient access, creating clinical competencies and providing lactation simulation experiences may offer midwifery students a broader opportunity to gain critical skills in lactation management to best support breastfeeding families.
Practices and Policies That Support Breastfeeding Among Military Women: A Systematic Review

Bridget A Owens,Diane DiTomasso

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usad128

2024-01-23

Abstract:Background: Previous and limited assessments of breastfeeding in women serving on active duty in the U.S. military demonstrate varied and conflicting data regarding breastfeeding outcomes. Disparities exist within the military where enlisted service members have consistently lower rates of breastfeeding duration compared to officers. Yet, little is known about successful care practices and military policies that promote breastfeeding in military women. The aim of this systematic review is to examine care practices and military policies associated with increased breastfeeding initiation and duration among women serving in the U.S. military. Materials and methods: We searched Cochrane Database, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PubMed, and PsycInfo for studies published from 2000 to 2022 that included U.S. military personnel and that focused on care practices and military policies that support breastfeeding. Our search terms included (breastfeeding OR breastfeed AND military) and (lactation OR lactating AND military). We included randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental, cohort, cross-sectional, and other observational designs. We evaluated potential bias in studies using the Evidence Project Risk of Bias Tool and synthesized the overall evidence using the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Synthesis and Recommendations Tool. Results: We included 14 studies that were independently reviewed by two authors. Breastfeeding initiation rates among military women were between 66% and 98%, and breastfeeding duration rates at 6 months ranged from 13% to 62%. In these studies, researchers examined various inpatient care practices (skin-to-skin care, timing of circumcision, and infant baths) (n = 3), care delivered by different types of providers (n = 3), group versus individual prenatal care (n = 2), breastfeeding education (n = 2), length of maternity leave (n = 2), and workplace support (n = 2). Skin-to-skin contact following delivery was positively associated with breastfeeding outcomes. There is insufficient evidence to determine if care by different types of medical providers, different types of prenatal care and education, timing of circumcision or baths, length of maternity leave, and workplace support influence breastfeeding outcomes. Conclusion: Certain perinatal practices designed to encourage early skin-to-skin contact appear to improve breastfeeding initiation and duration among women serving in the U.S. military. However, there is an overall lack of quality evidence supporting effective practices and policies associated with increased breastfeeding initiation and duration in this population. Given the recent movement toward policy changes that support pregnant and postpartum service members across services, more research is needed to determine the impact of these and other practices and policies on breastfeeding rates, specifically among enlisted service members who have demonstrated lower breastfeeding rates than officers.
Moving Beyond Breastfeeding Initiation: A Qualitative Study Unpacking Factors That Influence Infant Feeding at Hospital Discharge Among Urban, Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Women

Larelle H Bookhart,Andrea B Joyner,Kelly Lee,Nikkia Worrell,Denise J Jamieson,Melissa F Young

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2021.02.005

Abstract:Background: Factors that influence breastfeeding initiation and duration have been well established; however, there is limited understanding of in-hospital exclusive breastfeeding (EBF), which is critical for establishing breastfeeding. Grady Memorial Hospital, which serves a high proportion of participants receiving Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) and racial/ethnic minorities, had an in-hospital EBF rate in 2018 by the Joint Commission's definition of 29% and sought contextualized evidence on how to best support breastfeeding mothers. Objective: The objectives were to (1) identify facilitators and barriers to in-hospital EBF and (2) explore breastfeeding support available from key stakeholders across the social-ecological model. Design: In-depth, semistructured interviews were conducted and analyzed using thematic analysis. Participants: The sample included a total of 38 purposively sampled participants from Grady Memorial Hospital (10 EBF mothers, 10 non-EBF, and 18 key stakeholders such as clinicians, community organizations' staff, and administrators). Results: Key themes included that maternal perception of inadequate milk supply was a barrier to in-hospital EBF at the intrapersonal level. At the interpersonal level, a personable and individualized approach to breastfeeding counseling may be most effective in supporting EBF. At the institutional level, key determinants of EBF were gaps in prenatal breastfeeding education, limited time to provide comprehensive prenatal education to high-risk patients, and practical help with latching and positioning. Community-level WIC services were perceived as a facilitator due to the additional benefits provided for EBF mothers; however, the distribution of WIC vouchers for formula to mothers while they are in the hospital undermines the promotion of EBF. Cultural norms and a diverse patient population were reported as barriers to providing support at the macrosystem level. Conclusion: Multipronged approaches that span the social-ecological model may be required to support early EBF in hospital settings.
Women's status, breastfeeding support, and breastfeeding practices in the United States

Jennifer Yourkavitch,Paige Hall Smith

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275021

IF: 3.7

2022-09-28

PLoS ONE

Abstract:The objective of this study is to examine associations between state-level breastfeeding support and breastfeeding practices, controlling for women's status, in the U.S. We used publicly available data on state-level breastfeeding practices and support (international board-certified lactation consultants (IBCLC), births in Baby-Friendly hospitals, and La Leche League Leaders) for births in 2015 from the CDC Breastfeeding Report Card (2018) and other CDC reported data, and indicators of women's status from the Institute for Women's Policy Research reports (2015). We conducted an ecological study to estimate incidence rate ratios of exclusive breastfeeding at six months and breastfeeding at 12 months with breastfeeding supports using bivariate and multivariable Poisson regression. Political participation, poverty, and employment and earnings were associated with breastfeeding practices, as was each breastfeeding support in bivariate analyses. After controlling for women's status, only IBCLCs were positively associated with rates of exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months and continued breastfeeding at 12 months. For every additional IBCLC per 1000 live births, the rate of exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months increased by 5 percent (95% CI 1.03, 1.07) and the rate of breastfeeding at 12 months increased by 4 percent (95% CI 1.02, 1.06). Political participation, poverty, and employment and earnings were associated with breastfeeding practices, indicating a relationship between women's political and economic status and their breastfeeding practices in the U.S. Given the influence of women's status, increasing the number of IBCLCs may improve breastfeeding practices.
Barriers and facilitators to breastfeeding support practices in a neonatal intensive care unit in Colombia

Haley Abugov,Sandra Catalina Ochoa Marín,Sonia Semenic,Isabel Cristina Arroyave

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v39n1e11

Abstract:Objectives: To assess breastfeeding support practices and related barriers and facilitators in a large Intensive Care Unit, Neonatal (NICU) in Medellín, Colombia, as part of a broader quality improvement initiative to enhance breastfeeding support. Methods: A mixed-methods descriptive design was used to collect data on care practices and outcomes related to NICU breastfeeding support. Data sources included the Neo-BFHI's self-assessment questionnaire of breastfeeding policies and practices, clinical observations, and a retrospective review of 51 patient charts. Results: Of the 51 charts reviewed, 98% of the infants received breastmilk during their hospitalization but the majority (84%) also received formula and only 8% of infants were exclusively breastfed at the time of NICU discharge. All NICU staff received education on mother and baby-friendly care, and the unit complied with the International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk substitutes. However, resources to support lactation (e.g., access to breastfeeding specialists, breast pumps, written teaching materials for parents) were limited, and infants were only allowed to consume milk expressed within the hospital. Mother-infant separation, as well as staff beliefs and care routines, also limited important breastfeeding support practices such as skin-to-skin care and early initiation of direct breastfeeding. Conclusions: The self-assessment questionnaire and observations revealed a high value for breastfeeding and a family-centered approach to care in the NICU. Key challenges to sustaining breastfeeding in the NICU included a lack of facilities for supporting parental presence, barriers to expression and provision of mother's milk, and a high rate of bottle-feeding with formula.
Missed care and equitable breastfeeding support: An integrative review of exposure to in‐hospital care by patient characteristics and breastfeeding outcomes

Tiffany T. Gallagher,Anne Chevalier McKechnie

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16077

IF: 3.057

2024-02-02

Journal of Advanced Nursing

Abstract:Aim To synthesize the literature on breastfeeding outcomes associated with exposure to internationally recognized best practices, such as the Baby‐Friendly Hospital Initiative, for patients in the United States during the postpartum period, contextualized within the Missed Care Model. Design The authors employed Whittemore and Knafl's integrative review framework and the 2020 PRISMA guidelines for data extraction, synthesis, reporting and assessment. Methods Five electronic databases were searched for articles published between 2007 and 2023. Eligible articles reported on exposure to breastfeeding best practices and outcomes or the experiences, views, perceptions and attitudes of parents, nurses or lactation consultants regarding hospital breastfeeding support. Extracted data were compared to identify in‐hospital exposure to breastfeeding best practices and breastfeeding outcomes, and differences in exposure and outcomes based on patient and provider characteristics. Results Twenty‐one quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods articles met inclusion criteria. A higher reported adherence to best practices was associated with greater odds of breastfeeding; some practices demonstrated greater effects overall or for specific groups. Higher exposures to best practices and higher breastfeeding rates were found for non‐Hispanic white patients, and those with more education, private insurance and who live in urban areas. Disparities in support and outcomes were related to patients' race/ethnicity, language, weight and age. Qualitative findings reflected missed care concepts, such as internal processes related to habits and group norms, relevant to breastfeeding support. Conclusion Review findings also include an adapted Missed Care Model specific to breastfeeding support, which can inform future research related to providers' internal processes that may influence breastfeeding or equitable breastfeeding care. Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care Missed care can be influenced by a variety of factors, including providers' internal values and beliefs. Study findings suggest the existence of inequities in breastfeeding care and underscore the need to address and eliminate breastfeeding disparities. Impact This study addressed how patient exposure to best practices in breastfeeding support relates to breastfeeding outcomes and whether exposure and outcomes differ by patient or provider characteristics, connecting this to the Missed Care in Breastfeeding Support Model. The main findings were that higher reported exposure to best practices in breastfeeding support related to improved breastfeeding outcomes; inequities exist in exposure to best practices; and patients and providers identify the importance of providers' internal processes in the delivery of breastfeeding support, which aligns with the Missed Care in Breastfeeding Support Model. Study findings will have the potential to impact how nurses, lactation consultants and other providers who deliver breastfeeding support in the postpartum hospital setting. Reporting Method The authors adhered to relevant 2020 PRISMA reporting guidelines. Patient or Public Contribution No patient or public contribution.

nursing
Investigating short-stay admission to a neonatal intensive care unit as a risk factor for reduced breast feeding at discharge in infants ≥36 weeks' gestation: a retrospective cohort study

Rachel Ann Jones,James Elhindi,Gemma Lowe,Lynne Henry,Rajesh Maheshwari,Mihaela Roxana Culcer,Dharmintra Pasupathy,Sarah J Melov

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075658

IF: 3.006

2023-10-19

BMJ Open

Abstract:Objective: This study aims to determine the effect of infant-mother separation following a short-stay (≤72 hours) admission to a Level 5 neonatal unit versus no admission on infant-feeding outcomes at hospital discharge. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: An Australian Level 5 neonatal unit within a tertiary referral hospital. Participants: Mothers and their infants born between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2020 had a short-stay admission to the neonatal unit or no admission. All participants met admission criteria to the postnatal ward and were discharged home at ≤72 hours (n=12 540). Postnatal ward admission criteria included ≥36 weeks' gestation and birth weight ≥2.2 kg. Main outcome measures: Infant feeding at discharge from hospital. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted, adjusting for confounders associated with known breastfeeding issues. These included age, ethnicity, parity, obesity, socioeconomic score, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, diabetes, infant gestation and birthweight centile, caesarean section birth, postpartum haemorrhage and skin-to-skin contact. Results: Of the 12 540 live births meeting inclusion criteria, 1000 (8%) infants were admitted to the neonatal unit. The primary reasons for admission were suspicion of sepsis (24%), maternal diabetes (19%) and jaundice (16%). We found a reduction in full breast feeding at hospital discharge in cases of a short admission to the neonatal unit compared with no admission (aOR 0.40; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.47; p<0.001). We identified that women of different ethnicities had differing levels of risk for formula supplementation at hospital discharge. The ethnic grouping least likely to be fully breast feeding at discharge was Southeast Asian women (aOR 0.47; 95% CI 0.39 to 0.57; p<0.001). Conclusions: Identifying mother-infant dyads at risk of non-exclusive breast feeding at hospital discharge will help target resources for practice improvement.
Factors Associated with In-Hospital Exclusive Breastfeeding Among a Racially and Ethnically Diverse Patient Population

Larelle H Bookhart,Erica H Anstey,Denise J Jamieson,Michael R Kramer,Cria G Perrine,Usha Ramakrishnan,Nikkia Worrell,Melissa F Young

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2023.0115

Abstract:Objective: The aim of this study is to examine in-hospital exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) and its association with sociodemographic factors, medical factors, breastfeeding intentions, and health care system breastfeeding support. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study using medical records from 2015 to 2019 of healthy term infants without breastfeeding contraindications at a public teaching hospital serving a racially and ethnically diverse patient population. Using multivariable regression analysis, we examined the associations between in-hospital EBF and sociodemographic factors, medical factors, breastfeeding intentions, and health care system breastfeeding support (in-hospital breastfeeding education and lactation support). Results: The prevalence of in-hospital EBF was 29.0%. The statistically significant findings from our fully adjusted regression analysis include that there was a higher prevalence of in-hospital EBF among adult mothers (prevalence ratio [PR]: range 1.78-1.96), married mothers (PR: 1.35, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.23-1.44), and mothers who were White (PR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.20-1.66, compared with Black). Factors associated with a lower prevalence of in-hospital EBF were maternal diabetes (PR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.70-0.95), pre-eclampsia/eclampsia (PR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.71-0.95), cesarean delivery (PR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.77-0.92), neonatal hypoglycemia (PR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.36-0.59), and intention in the prenatal period to formula feed only (PR: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.10-0.22). In-hospital lactation support was associated with higher prevalence of in-hospital EBF (PR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.16-1.33). Conclusions: Prioritizing lactation support for Black mothers, adolescent mothers, those intending in the prenatal period to formula feed only, and mother-infant dyads with certain medical factors could improve in-hospital EBF.
Exclusive Breastfeeding at Discharge in Regional New South Wales, Australia: The Role of Antenatal Care (2011-2020)

Emma Woolley,Gretchen Buck,Jackie Jackson,Rebekah Bowman,Louise Fox,Shirlena Gallagher,Malindey Sorrell,Pramesh Raj Ghimire

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20126135

2023-06-15

Abstract:Increasing the number of infants exclusively breastfeeding on discharge from the hospital after birth is a key goal of breastfeeding policy in New South Wales (NSW), Australia. Despite consistent efforts, exclusive breastfeeding on discharge rates have declined over the past decade. Using pooled data from the New South Wales Perinatal Data Collection from 2011 to 2020, we examined the association between antenatal care (ANC) and exclusive breastfeeding at discharge from birth admission outcomes for mother-baby dyads in Southern New South Wales Local Health District (SNSWLHD). Our study confirmed that exclusive breastfeeding rates in SNSWLHD have declined over the past decade, providing local evidence to support action. Late entry to ANC and a failure to attend the recommended number of ANC visits were important predictors of a lower rate of exclusive breastfeeding on discharge. Improving accessibility to ANC visits for rural and regional mothers has potential to positively impact breastfeeding rates in SNSWLHD. We suggest that wider implementation of caseload midwifery models may have a positive impact on breastfeeding outcomes in the region for all mother-baby dyads, but particularly for Aboriginal mothers and infants, younger mothers and mothers experiencing disadvantage.
The evolution of professional obstetric nursing in the United States (1880′s-present): Qualitative content analysis of specialty nursing textbooks

Antonia M. Nelson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnsa.2020.100010

2020-11-01

International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances

Abstract:Background Professional maternal-newborn/obstetric nursing in the United States emerged in the mid- 19th century coinciding with the increased medical management of childbirth. Before this mothers were attended by female family members, friends, neighbors and lay nurses or midwives. Objective To trace the evolution of professional maternal-newborn/obstetric nursing since its inception, identify factors which may have influenced this evolution, and consider how this knowledge can inform current issues and challenges in caring for childbearing families. Methods Qualitative content analysis, informed by historical research methods, was used to analyze selected content from a sample of maternal-newborn/obstetric nursing textbooks published from the 1880′s to the present. Findings The last 150 years have been characterized by vast changes in medicine, technology and the healthcare system which have all influenced the evolution of professional maternal-newborn/obstetric nursing. Over the decades there has also been a significant change in the conceptualization of pregnancy/childbearing and our relative understanding of maternal and infant vulnerability. Findings revealed, however, that over time the primary focus of professional maternal-newborn/obstetric nursing care has consistently been: “protection, counseling/teaching and support” of childbearing families. In the U.S. maternal-newborn/obstetric nurses currently face many challenges including caring for an increasingly diverse patient population within a complex, technologically advanced healthcare system. This system is characterized by a high rate of cesarean section births, frequent intervention in vaginal births, disparities in access to care, and a high rate of preventable morbidity and mortality. Conclusions Since its origins the nursing profession has matured and nursing's allegience is now clearly to patients and society Today's nurses have the opportunity to play a key role in advocating for healthcare reform which would allow for less interference in the natural birth process, maximize patient outcomes, decrease inequities, and make comprehensive care for all mothers and infants a national priority.
Evaluation of an e-Learning Breastfeeding Program for Postpartum Mothers of Moderately High-Risk Newborn Infants Admitted to the Special Care Nursery

Mei-Ling Fu,Tzu-Ying Lee,Su-Chen Kuo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JPN.0000000000000546

Abstract:Because of a lack of proper breastfeeding education to mothers and the visitation policy in the special care nursery, breastfeeding initiation and maintenance can be very challenging for both the mother and her infant who is admitted to the neonatal special care nursery after birth. Difficulties associated with forming initial bonds may contribute to some mothers changing their mind about their initially chosen feeding method. The aim of this quasi-experimental study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an e-learning breastfeeding program on maternal breastfeeding outcomes. Thirty-four mothers in the comparison group received routine care; 34 in the intervention group received an e-learning breastfeeding program and routine care. The program included 28 modules of different topics downloaded to a personal tablet computer. Each module elaborated on a breastfeeding issue and provided video clips to show practice steps. During the mothers' 3- to 5-day stay in the postpartum unit, they could repeatedly watch selected topics related to their situations at their own pace. After adjusting for each infant's birth weight, mothers in the intervention group had better attachment to their infants, greater perceived nurse support, and a higher exclusive breastfeeding rate than mothers in the comparison group. Using a tablet computer device to disseminate breastfeeding education is a feasible and supplemental method for postpartum mothers whose infants are in the special care nursery. Through the demonstrated situations, mothers are better prepared to understand their high-risk infants and the situations they may encounter during breastfeeding.

Maternity care practices supportive of breastfeeding in U.S. advanced neonatal care units, United States, 2022

Changes in maternity care policies and practices that support breastfeeding as measured by the Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding — United States, 2018–2022

Alignment of State Regulations With Breastfeeding and Beverage Best Practices for Childcare Centers and Family Childcare Homes, United States

Healthcare Professionals' Attitudes and Practices in Supporting and Promoting the Breastfeeding of Preterm Infants in NICUs

Barriers and Facilitators in Lactation Support for the Preterm Mother–Infant Dyad: An Integrated Approach

Effect of Neonatal Unit Interventions Designed to Increase Breastfeeding in Preterm Infants: An Overview of Systematic Reviews

Baby-Friendly Hospitals, Social Determinants of Health, and Disparities in Breastfeeding Initiation in a Low-Income Population, 2017–2020

Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine Clinical Protocol #19: Breastfeeding Promotion in the Prenatal Period (Revised 2024)

Do Breastfeeding Policies and Practices in Neonatal Intensive Care Units Differ by Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative Status?

Building a Comprehensive System of Breastfeeding and Lactation Care in the United States

Breastfeeding and Human Lactation Curriculum Survey of Midwifery Programs in the United States

Practices and Policies That Support Breastfeeding Among Military Women: A Systematic Review

Moving Beyond Breastfeeding Initiation: A Qualitative Study Unpacking Factors That Influence Infant Feeding at Hospital Discharge Among Urban, Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Women

Women's status, breastfeeding support, and breastfeeding practices in the United States

Barriers and facilitators to breastfeeding support practices in a neonatal intensive care unit in Colombia

Missed care and equitable breastfeeding support: An integrative review of exposure to in‐hospital care by patient characteristics and breastfeeding outcomes

Investigating short-stay admission to a neonatal intensive care unit as a risk factor for reduced breast feeding at discharge in infants ≥36 weeks' gestation: a retrospective cohort study

Factors Associated with In-Hospital Exclusive Breastfeeding Among a Racially and Ethnically Diverse Patient Population

Exclusive Breastfeeding at Discharge in Regional New South Wales, Australia: The Role of Antenatal Care (2011-2020)

The evolution of professional obstetric nursing in the United States (1880′s-present): Qualitative content analysis of specialty nursing textbooks

Evaluation of an e-Learning Breastfeeding Program for Postpartum Mothers of Moderately High-Risk Newborn Infants Admitted to the Special Care Nursery