Utility of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring for detecting masked hypertension and masked uncontrolled hypertension

Walter Espeche,Julian Minetto,Martin Rogelio Salazar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-024-01964-5
2024-11-13
Hypertension Research
Abstract:Masked hypertension and masked uncontrolled hypertension are hypertension phenotypes with a similar cardiovascular prognosis, even comparable to sustained hypertension. Therefore, it is crucial to unmask this condition, with the first step being proper detection and diagnosis. Current recommendations for defining this phenotype emphasize two equally important methods: home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). However, in a study published by Tomitani [1], it was demonstrated that HBPM detects a higher percentage of patients with masked hypertension than ABPM, despite the latter identifying patients with isolated nocturnal hypertension, which can account for up to 24% of all masked hypertensive patients [2, 3]. This important study has methodological characteristics different from previous studies [2], which could explain these results: (1) out-of-office measurements were performed with the same device (TM 2441, all-in-one), (2) the evaluated population consisted entirely of treated but uncontrolled masked hypertensive patients, and (3) nocturnal hypertension was defined solely based on systolic blood pressure, without considering diastolic blood pressure. However, when both periods are included in the definition, the percentage of masked hypertension detected by ABPM increases to 32.1% (24% by HBPM). This last point is crucial, and when analyzing samples from our own databases, we observe similar data regarding the prevalence of masked hypertension defined by diastolic blood pressure.
peripheral vascular disease
What problem does this paper attempt to address?