Non-literal language processing is jointly supported by the language and Theory of Mind networks: Evidence from a novel meta-analytic fMRI approach
Miriam Hauptman,Idan Blank,Evelina Fedorenko
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.08.481056
2022-03-10
Abstract:Abstract Going beyond the literal meaning of utterances is key to communicative success. However, the mechanisms that support non-literal inferences remain debated. We use a novel meta-analytic approach to evaluate the contribution of linguistic, social-cognitive, and executive mechanisms to non-literal interpretation. We identified 74 fMRI experiments (n=1,430 participants) from 2001-2021 that contrasted non-literal language comprehension with a literal control condition, spanning ten phenomena (e.g., metaphor, irony, indirect speech). Applying the activation likelihood estimation approach to the 825 activation peaks yielded six left-lateralized clusters. We then evaluated the locations of both the individual-study peaks and the clusters against probabilistic functional atlases (cf. macroanatomy, as is typically done) for three candidate brain networks—the language-selective network (Fedorenko et al., 2011), which supports language processing, the Theory of Mind (ToM) network (Saxe & Kanwisher, 2003), which supports social inferences, and the domain-general Multiple-Demand (MD) network (Duncan, 2010), which supports executive control. These atlases were created by overlaying individual activation maps of participants who performed robust and extensively validated ‘localizer’ tasks (n=806 for language; n=198 for ToM; n=691 for MD). The analysis revealed that both the individual-study peaks and the ALE clusters fell primarily within the language network and the ToM network. These results suggest that non-literal processing is supported by both i) mechanisms that process literal linguistic meaning, and ii) mechanisms that support general social inference. They thus undermine a strong divide between literal and non-literal aspects of language and challenge the claim that non-literal processing requires additional executive resources. Significance Statement Non-literal language is pervasive in communication. Past work has linked non-literal language understanding to language comprehension, social inference, and executive control, which selectively draw on the language, Theory of Mind (ToM), and Multiple Demand (MD) brain networks, respectively. Using a novel meta-analytic approach, we leverage ‘probabilistic functional atlases’ for these networks—created using fMRI data from hundreds of participants performing validated functional ‘localizers’—to interpret activations for non-literal>literal contrasts from 74 past fMRI studies (1,430 participants, 825 activation peaks). Unlike traditional meta-analyses, which rely on anatomy for interpretation, this approach enables inferences about cognitive processes. We find that activations fall within the language and ToM networks, but not the MD network, undermining the role of executive control in non-literal interpretation.