What goes around comes around - work characteristics as both antecedents and outcomes of hybrid work adoption
Lisa Handke Thomas A. O'Neill Matthew J.W. McLarnon Simone Kauffeld a Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg,School of Business Economics,and Society,Nuremberg,Germanyb Department of Psychology,University of Calgary,Calgary,Canadac Bissett School of Business,Mount Royal University,Calgary,Canadad Department of Psychology,Technische Universität Braunschweig,Brunswick,Germany
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432x.2024.2441884
2024-12-16
European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
Abstract:The effectiveness of hybrid work (a combination of telework and office-based work) has been theorized to operate through improvements in employees' control over their workflow and work environment. However, current knowledge is largely based on static research designs and does not adequately consider the circumstances that drive employees' actual adoption of hybrid work. In this study, we propose that adopting hybrid work improves four work characteristics tied to employees' control over their workflow and work environment, namely autonomy, demanding environmental conditions (e.g. noise), workflow interruptions, and time pressure. At the same time, we also propose that employees' actual hybrid work adoption depends on these same four work characteristics to begin with. Using a quasi-experimental study, we employ latent change score modelling to analyse how autonomy, demanding environmental conditions, workflow interruptions and time pressure influence, and are influenced by, hybrid work adoption, based on a sample of 699 white-collar workers. Results show that whereas autonomy and workflow interruptions drive hybrid work adoption, demanding environmental conditions and workflow interruptions change as a result of it. This suggests that organizational hybrid work policies can largely improve job demands, but that only a select group of employees adopt hybrid work.
psychology, applied,management