Abstract:Background and aims For thrombectomy, some stroke centres have started to use two stents simultaneously instead of only one to achieve better recanalisation rates, i.e. a double stentriever (DS) technique. The first observations regarding this new technique are promising. We aim to report our experience in DS at the acute phase of stroke, compare with the single stentriever technique. Methods We included consecutive individuals undergoing mechanical thrombectomy in the setting of acute ischemic stroke associated to a large vessel occlusion (LVO) or medium vessel occlusion (MeVO) in the anterior circulation. Individuals were included between 01.2022 and 07.2023. We excluded individuals <18 years old, those who were treated beyond 24h from last proof of good health and those who were not treated with stentriever as a first-line recanalization strategy. We compared patients undergoing double-stentriever (DS) technique for first-pass strategy vs single-stentriever (SS) technique for first-pass strategy. For the primary outcome analysis, we assessed first-pass complete recanalization (eTICI 2c-3) applying ordinal regression analyses using other prognostic co-variates. Secondary safety outcomes included procedure-related complications, early neurologic deterioration of ischemic origin (ENDi) and symptomatic intracerebral bleeding (sICH). Secondary functional outcomes included 24h-NIHSS and 3 month modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Complications such as procedural perforation, dissection, bleedings, embolization, access complication and/or reocclusion were also assessed as a dichotomized variable. Ethical commission approval and individual consent were not required according to the Swiss Human Research Act because all local data were anonymized before analysis, and because this quality assessment project aimed at the evaluation of safety and effectiveness of revascularisation treatment in current clinical practice. Results Among 187 consecutive people (median age 76 (IQR= 65-83), 97/187 (52 % female, median admission NIHSS 14 (IQR=7-19)). Among them, 39 (26%) were treated with first pass DS and 148 patients (74%) with first pass SS. Within the SS group, 16 patients had rescue DS. First-pass complete recanalization (eTICI 2c-3) was achieved in 29/39 (74%) individuals treated with DS technique compared to 63/148 (43%) receiving SS technique. Procedural complications were seen in 5/39 (13%) in the DS group vs 39/148 (26%) with SS. ENDi was evidenced in 3/39 (8%) with DS compared to 18/148 (12%) with SS. sICH according to ECASSII definition was seen in 2/39 (5%) in DS compared to 8/148 (5%) in the SS group. Conclusions We dramatically increase the rate of first pass eTICI 2c/3 with DS. We didn't observe more complication rate during DS technique. Prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to support our conclusions.

Abstract WP192: Impact of Second Line Thrombectomy Technique Following Failed First Pass Thrombectomy for Anterior Circulation Stroke: To Switch or Not to Switch?

Improved technical outcomes with converting thrombectomy techniques after failed first pass recanalization

Abstract WMP96: When to Change? Altering Strategies in Mechanical Thrombectomy May Impact Reperfusion Rates

Early technique switch following failed passes during mechanical thrombectomy for ischemic stroke: should the approach change and when?

Abstract TP193: Impact of Number of Passes on Outcomes of Mechanical Thrombectomy in Stroke Patients With Low ASPECTS

Abstract TP192: Combined Intra-Venous and Intra-Arterial Thrombolysis versus Intra-Venous Thrombolysis Alone in Stroke Patients Undergoing Mechanical Thrombectomy for Large Vessel Occlusion: A Propensity-Matched Analysis

Technique and impact on first pass effect primary results of the ASSIST global registry

Abstract WP184: Intravenous Thrombolysis Improves Outcomes in Stroke Patients With Unsuccessful Mechanical Thrombectomy

Comparison of combined intravenous and intra-arterial thrombolysis with intravenous thrombolysis alone in stroke patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy: a propensity-matched analysis

Abstract 158: Rescue Strategy for Failed Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: An Analysis of the SVIN Registry

214 Technical and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Short-term Repeated Mechanical Thrombectomy: An International Multicenter Study

Thrombectomy: Comparison Between The Single And Dual Stentriever Techniques

Abstract TP184: Outcomes and Clinical Features Associated With Emergency Conversion to General Anesthesia During Stroke Thrombectomy

First-line thrombectomy strategy for distal and medium vessel occlusions: a systematic review

Aspiration Versus Stent‐Retriever as First‐Line Endovascular Therapy Technique for Primary Medium and Distal Intracranial Occlusions: A Propensity‐Score Matched Multicenter Analysis

Outcomes of Mechanical Thrombectomy for Patients With Stroke Presenting With Low Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score in the Early and Extended Window

Abstract 153: First Pass Effect in Mechanical Thrombectomy for Anterior Circulation Acute Ischemic Stroke is Modified by Procedure Time: Proposal of a New Measure for Thrombectomy Procedures

Abstract TP189: Outcome Differences Between Endovascular Thrombectomy and Medical Management Based on Underlying Stroke Etiology: A Secondary Analysis of SELECT2 Trial

Rescue Therapy for Failed Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Pooled Analysis of the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology Registry

Abstract WP215: Number of Passes Matter in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Who Underwent Failed Mechanical Thrombectomy

Abstract TP219: Outcomes and Differences by Occluded Vessel in the Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients With Medium Vessel Occlusion