Reproducibility of Portable OCT and Comparison with Conventional OCT

Marie Nakamura,Takao Hirano,Yoshiaki Chiku,Yoshiaki Takahashi,Hideki Miyasaka,Shinji Kakihara,Ken Hoshiyama,Toshinori Murata

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14131320

IF: 3.6

2024-06-22

Diagnostics

Abstract:Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is an indispensable instrument in ophthalmology; however, some facilities lack permanent OCT devices. ACT100, a portable SD-OCT system, allows for medical examinations at hospitals that do not have OCT and house calls. We investigated the usefulness of ACT100 by examining the reproducibility of retinal thickness measurements in 35 healthy participants with normal eyes using ACT100 and Cirrus. Using two OCTs, the OCT imaging of both eyes of each subject was performed. Macular retinal thickness was evaluated using the average value in nine lesions of the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) circle. Both models captured images in all cases. In the right eye, mean retinal thickness was significantly lower than in the ACT100 group in all regions; however, the measured values correlated well. The intraclass correlation coefficients showed the same high reliability as the Cirrus. The coefficients of variation (CVs) of both models showed little variation and high stability; however, the CV of ACT100 was significantly higher. The left eye was almost identical. Macular retinal thickness measured using ACT100 showed slightly greater variability than that by Cirrus; the reproducibility was good and correlated well with that of Cirrus. This technique is a suitable alternative to conventional OCT.

medicine, general & internal

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper aims to explore the measurement reproducibility of the portable optical coherence tomography (OCT) device ACT100 in normal eyes and compare it with the traditional fixed - position OCT device Cirrus. Specifically, the researchers examined the measurement reproducibility of ACT100 and its differences from Cirrus by evaluating the retinal thickness in the macular area of both eyes of 35 healthy participants. The main issues of concern in the study are:

1. **Measurement reproducibility of ACT100**: Verify whether the measurement results of ACT100 in normal eyes are highly reproducible.
2. **Comparison between ACT100 and Cirrus**: Compare the accuracy and consistency of ACT100 and Cirrus in measuring retinal thickness.

The study found that although the measurement results of ACT100 were slightly lower than those of Cirrus, there was a high correlation between the two. In addition, the measurement reproducibility of ACT100 in most areas was comparable to that of Cirrus, but the coefficient of variation (CV) in some peripheral areas was slightly higher. Overall, the measurement reproducibility and accuracy of ACT100 in normal eyes are relatively high, and it can be used as an alternative to traditional OCT devices, especially in medical institutions without fixed OCT devices or during home visits.